Author

admin

Browsing

Electric vehicle (EV) adoption in Europe is increasing. One would expect that Tesla would be one of the biggest winners of such news.

But the company’s sales are falling across most of its key markets.

The latest figures from Norway, Germany, France, Sweden, and Denmark paint a clear picture: consumers are turning their backs on Tesla in favour of European, Japanese, and even Chinese competitors.

The company that once dominated EV markets is struggling to maintain its position.

This is a situation that not only worries the company’s shareholders, but it also highlights some key insights about the economy and the trajectory of global EV adoption.

The data tells the story

The European EV market is expanding, with battery electric vehicles (BEVs) accounting for 15% of total EU car sales in January 2025, up from 10.9% in January 2024.

BEV sales surged by 34%, with strong growth in Germany, Belgium, and the Netherlands.

Hybrid-electric vehicles now make up 34.9% of new car sales in the EU, making them the most popular choice among buyers.

Plug-in hybrid EVs (PHEVs), however, are in decline, down 8.5% in January, as consumers move toward full electrification.

In Norway, where EVs accounted for 96% of all new passenger car sales in early 2025, Tesla’s sales dropped by nearly half.

The company sold just 1,606 units in January and February, down from 2,887 during the same period in 2024.

Meanwhile, Volkswagen saw a 224.1% increase in sales, Toyota surged by 97.6%, and Nissan grew by 31.3%.

The best-selling EV in Norway was no longer a Tesla but the Toyota bZ4X, followed by the Volkswagen ID.4.

Tesla’s top-selling Model Y saw a staggering 64.4% decline.

Germany, the EU’s largest car market, saw overall BEV sales grow by 53.5% in January.

However, Tesla’s presence has weakened as German automakers ramp up production.

Volkswagen, BMW, and Mercedes-Benz are all gaining ground, particularly as Tesla struggles with the impact of Germany’s subsidy cuts in 2024.

In France, Tesla’s year-to-date sales are down 44%.

The Model Y, which was the country’s best-selling EV in 2024, has fallen to 27th place in 2025, trailing behind the Peugeot 208, Renault 5, and Citroën e-C3.

Meanwhile, overall EV sales in France have remained stable, with domestic automakers benefiting from government incentives.

Sweden and Denmark also show a similar pattern.

Sweden’s BEV market share rose to 31.9% in February, but Tesla sales dropped 42%, with the Model Y down 52.1%.

In Denmark, EVs accounted for 65% of all new cars sold in February, a 72% year-on-year increase, but Tesla’s sales fell by 48%.

These figures make it clear: the European EV market is expanding, but Tesla is heading towards the opposite direction.

What’s really driving Tesla’s decline?

Tesla’s struggles in Europe are not just about numbers. The company is facing multiple challenges that are making it harder to compete.

First, there is more competition than ever. Volkswagen, BMW, Peugeot, Renault, and Toyota are all producing high-quality, affordable EVs that directly compete with Tesla’s lineup.

Many of these models are priced lower, making them attractive to buyers who once defaulted to Tesla.

Government incentives also play a role.

France, for example, has structured its subsidies to favour domestic automakers, making Tesla a less attractive option.

Germany’s abrupt subsidy cuts in 2024 hurt EV demand in general, but Tesla was particularly affected as many buyers had relied on these incentives to make Tesla’s higher-priced models more affordable.

Consumer perception is another major factor.

A recent survey in Norway found that 67% of consumers now have a more negative view of Tesla than before, largely due to Elon Musk’s political beliefs.

While Tesla’s early buyers were attracted to the brand’s innovation and exclusivity, that appeal is fading.

Tesla is no longer a niche brand. It is just another carmaker in a crowded field, and competitors are catching up. Brand fatigue is a real thing.

The brand’s reputation has also taken a hit due to service and reliability concerns.

Tesla ranks poorly in Norway’s Consumer Council and NAF reports, with frequent complaints about customer service and repair times.

Many buyers who once saw Tesla as the best option for an EV now have alternatives that offer better support.

Musk’s growing political controversies are also playing a role. His support for right-wing figures such as Germany’s AfD party and his influence through U.S.

President Donald Trump is alienating European buyers.

Unlike in the US, where Musk’s political influence might not affect Tesla’s market, European consumers are showing signs of disengagement from the brand.

Protests at Tesla dealerships in multiple countries suggest that public perception of the company is deteriorating, and quickly.

Can Tesla recover in Europe?

The company is certainly going to try its best to regain Europe’s trust. Tesla is set to release an updated Model Y, known as “Juniper,” in March 2025.

Historically, March has been a strong sales month for Tesla, and the company is hoping that the refreshed model will help reverse its decline.

However, it remains uncertain whether a facelift alone will be enough to turn things around.

Tesla also stands to benefit from new EU policies.

The European Commission is set to introduce an automotive action plan that includes incentives for electrifying company fleets and new funding for battery manufacturing in Europe.

If Tesla can align with these incentives, it may regain some lost ground.

However, the company still faces major challenges.

Competition will only increase, and European automakers are aggressively expanding their EV lineups. Tesla’s biggest problem is no longer supply; it’s demand.

The European market is changing, and Tesla is no longer the only compelling option.

If Tesla wants to recover, it will need to do more than release updated models. It needs to lower prices, improve service quality, and repair its brand image in Europe.

Otherwise, the decline seen in early 2025 may only be the beginning of a longer-term trend.

History shows that once a brand’s image gets tarnished, it’s incredibly difficult to rebuild.

The fact that Europeans are now embracing EVs while disassociating from the Tesla brand is enough proof that the company has a mountain to climb.

The post Europeans are embracing EVs while Tesla is imploding: here’s why appeared first on Invezz

Gap Inc (NYSE: GAP) was struggling with sales declines, profitability concerns, and loss of cultural relevance amidst an ever-increasing competition in the retail market up until the first half of 2023.

Then it named Richard Dickson its chief executive, hoping the market veteran could revitalise its brands just as he did with Barbie at Mattel.

And the clothing and accessories retailer’s Q4 results last night suggest it was the right decision to onboard Dickson as he’s seeing incredible success in turning around Gap.  

Gap earned 54 cents a share in its recently concluded quarter – up significantly versus 36 cents per share that analysts had forecast.

Gap saw market share gains across all four brands

Gap currently owns three notable names other than its namesake brand: Athleta, Banana Republic, and Old Navy.

Its shares are being rewarded this morning (up 18% in premarket) as all of those brands “gained market share against a backdrop of a declining apparel industry,” chief executive Richard Dickson revealed in an interview on Friday.

Plus, the New York listed firm saw an uptick across all income cohorts as well, with lower income groups contributing the most to overall market share gains in Q4.

Despite today’s rally, Gap stock is down some 7.0% versus its year-to-date high in late January.

Gap chief executive downplays tariffs impact

Speaking with Jim Cramer, the company’s chief executive also downplayed the potential impact of higher tariffs the Trump administration has announced on Canada, Mexico, and China.

The apparel and accessories retailer relies on China for nearly 10% of its products while it sources less than 1.0% of the assortments from Canada and Mexico combined.

Richard Dickson also confirmed that Gap will continue to diversify its supply chain to further minimise the effect of tariffs on its customers.

“We’re going to be working hard to continue the momentum that we have. Tariffs cost inputs, these are all the day-to-day of doing business,” he added.

Gap stock rallies on upbeat future guidance

Investors are cheering Gap’s quarterly report also because its management offered upbeat full year guidance despite the broader concerns of higher tariffs.

The company based out of San Francisco, California, now sees its sales climbing as much as 2.0% this year. Analysts, in comparison, had called for the revenue to remain flat in 2025.

“The brand campaigns and collaborations are attracting a new generation to Gap while reinforcing the brand to those who loved us for years,” said CEO Dickson in the earnings release.  

Wall Street seems to share his optimism on what the future holds for Gap shares, considering the consensus rating currently sits at “overweight”.

Analysts see upside in the retail stock to nearly $29 on average, which indicates potential for more than 20% upside on top of today’s gains.

The post Gap turnaround: here’s what Richard Dickson has achieved in 1.5 years appeared first on Invezz

The global coffee trade is facing an unprecedented crisis as soaring prices disrupt supply chains and force roasters to scale back purchases.

A 70% surge in Arabica coffee futures since November has left traders, roasters, and retailers grappling with uncertainty, with buyers unwilling to commit to large orders.

The situation has prompted major players to rethink their strategies as coffee warehouses remain understocked, and negotiations with retailers stall.

At the US National Coffee Association’s annual convention in Houston this week, traders and roasters warned that the supply crunch could have lasting consequences for the industry.

While higher prices typically indicate profitability for coffee producers, this time, buyers are reluctant to absorb costs, limiting the flow of coffee through supply chains.

Industry leaders now face difficult choices as they weigh the impact of prolonged volatility on global coffee markets.

Retailers push back as roasters cut purchases

Coffee roasters worldwide are reducing their purchasing volumes, with some unable to sell their expected annual production.

Renan Chueiri, director general at Ecuador’s ELCAFE C.A., noted that his company has only sold 30% of its projected output this year—an unprecedented situation.

Many buyers, he said, are struggling with liquidity and cannot afford to buy at current prices.

Retailers are also resisting price increases, making it difficult for roasters to pass on higher costs. Some supermarkets and grocery stores are delaying negotiations, leading to shortages on shelves.

A US-based roasting executive said some of his clients fear they will be unable to sell coffee at the new prices, forcing them to reconsider their business models.

In response to the crisis, traders are adopting cautious strategies.

Deals in Brazil, the world’s top coffee producer, are now conducted under stricter terms.

Buyers only pay after verifying the quality of the beans on-site, a shift that underscores the heightened risk in the market.

This conservative approach has slowed transactions and further strained cash flows across the supply chain.

Supply shortages force warehouse closures

The supply squeeze is evident at major coffee storage hubs in the US, where warehouses near ports are operating at half their usual capacity.

An executive from one of the largest storage firms noted that some companies are returning silos to their owners and terminating leasing agreements early due to the lack of stock. This signals a severe supply crunch that could persist unless production rebounds significantly.

As smaller traders struggle with financing constraints, industry consolidation is accelerating. Larger firms with deeper capital reserves are poised to expand their market share, while smaller businesses may be forced out of the industry.

Michael Von Luehrte, owner of broker MVLcoffee, expects trading firms with greater financial resources to increase their volumes, while those with limited access to credit could struggle to stay afloat.

Brazil’s harvest could end the price rally

Despite the current crisis, some analysts predict that Arabica prices may fall by 30% by the end of the year.

A recent Reuters poll suggests that demand destruction due to high prices and a potentially strong Brazilian harvest in 2025 could stabilise the market.

The expansion of coffee plantations in Brazil, India, Uganda, and Ethiopia may further contribute to a supply recovery, potentially reversing the price surge.

Commodities trader Louis Dreyfus highlighted that an abundant harvest in Brazil, combined with new planting efforts, could lead to a price collapse.

However, this depends on favourable weather conditions and sustained investment in coffee-growing regions.

The post Global coffee crisis brews as soaring prices disrupt supply chains and rattle industry appeared first on Invezz

Ecopetrol’s president, Ricardo Roa, confirmed that the Colombian state-owned company would not conduct any business with Venezuela as long as US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) prohibitions were in effect.

This declaration represents an important position for Ecopetrol, particularly in light of recent geopolitical changes affecting the region’s oil and gas business.

According to local media W Radio, Roa’s comments come after Washington revoked Chevron’s operating license and gave the oil company one month to vacate the territory.

The Trump administration announced the decision after Venezuela did not comply with the commitments to receive illegal immigrants back, and continuing disputes over the elections in the country.

What influenced Ecopetrol’s decision

In a press briefing, Roa stated that the company will maintain a clear and responsible approach.

He further stated that it is a very important sign for the company and it is crystal clear that they will stay away from any negotiations and transactions with Venezuela under OFAC restrictions.

A key element that marks the path of Ecopetrol’s decision is the lack of the Antonio Ricaurte gas pipeline. This infrastructure is important for enabling energy exchanges between Colombia and Venezuela.

According to Roa, the lack of access to this pipeline hinders cross-border economic operations.

Another obstacle, along with logistical difficulties, is the lack of any certainty that gas could be exported from Venezuela to Colombia.

Without a robust energy commerce architecture in place, it would simply not make any business sense for Ecopetrol to conduct business in Venezuela, Roa said.

Ecopetrol’s fund-raising plans

Colombia’s state-controlled oil producer Ecopetrol plans to raise up to $2 billion in additional debt this year to support investments and is considering funding options through banks and capital markets, a company official said on Wednesday.

The debt will be allocated toward inorganic investments, including the acquisition of new assets or projects.

Corporate Vice President of Finance Camilo Barco stated in a call with investors that the company’s board had authorized $1 billion in structural debt and an additional $1 billion as a temporary measure.

Barco expressed confidence that the investment plan would gain momentum in the latter half of the year, necessitating some financing operations to execute the inorganic investment strategy.

Ecopetrol has outlined an investment plan ranging from $5.9 billion to $6.8 billion for the year, primarily funded by its cash reserves, which stood at $4.4 billion at the end of 2024.

Ecopetrol expects production to range between 740,000 and 750,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day (boepd) in 2025, Vice President of Hydrocarbons Rafael Guzman said.

The company reported an average production of 745,800 boepd last year, its highest level in nine years.

Ecopetrol reported a nearly 22% annual decline in net profit for 2024, impacted by a stronger US dollar and lower international oil prices.

The post Colombia’s Ecopetrol says it will not do business with Venezuela following US OFAC restrictions appeared first on Invezz

Uber Technologies Inc (NYSE: UBER) has had an incredible start to the new year but its year-to-date gains may only be a drop in the bucket compared to where the stock may be headed in 2025, according to Timothy Chubb.

The chief investment officer of Girard Advisory Services expects the ride-sharing stock to offer a few more positive surprises as we advance through the year.

On CNBC’s “Power Lunch”, the market veteran went on to count Uber stock among his highest conviction ideas for the next 12 months.

Uber’s growth story is underappreciated

Timothy Chubb expects Uber stock to extend its recent gains in the months ahead as it’s a “perfect example where the fundamentals of the core business are doing extremely well.”

The market, he’s convinced, is underappreciating user growth and engagement levels at Uber, as well as the strength of its free cash flow.

Last month, the ride-hailing giant came in shy of the quarterly earnings estimates and offered muted bookings guidance for its fiscal Q1. 

However, the Girard Advisory expert sees that the expected weakness is temporary and continues to believe in the long-term potential of Uber Technologies Inc.

However, shares of the multinational transportation company remain unattractive for income investors as they do not currently pay a dividend.

Uber is expanding into robotaxi services

Uber has recently debuted a robotaxi service in collaboration with Waymo in Austin, Texas – and plans on launching a similar service in a bunch of other cities by the end of this year.

According to Timothy Chubb of Girard Advisory Services, the New York listed firm could benefit rather significantly as it continues to commercialise autonomous vehicles in the United States.

All in all, the chief investment officer sees Uber stock trading at north of $100 by early next year, which translates to about a 31% upside from current levels.

Wall Street seems to agree with Chubb considering the consensus rating on Uber shares currently sits at “buy”.

Is it worth buying Uber stock in 2025?

Uber stock is currently going for about 16 times earnings, which is not particularly cheap compared to its historical price-to-earnings ratio of less than 10.  

But the company based out of San Francisco, California, may still be worth an investment at current levels as it’s expanding into robotaxis and advertising to diversify its revenue stream.

Together with the dominance Uber already has in ride-sharing and food delivery that continues to drive double-digit percentage gains in revenue despite the global scale, it’s reasonable to believe that its share price could push further up from here by the end of 2025.

Note that Uber share price is currently up more than 250% versus the pandemic

The post Uber stock: could it surpass $100 in 2025? appeared first on Invezz

Investors have been cautious about high-growth technology stocks in 2024, with broader market uncertainty and concerns over President Donald Trump’s tariff policies putting pressure on valuations.

The Nasdaq Composite has declined 6% so far this year as investors rotate out of last year’s best-performing stocks and software companies have not been immune to this downturn.

The iShares Expanded Tech Sector exchange-traded fund, which includes major software firms, has fallen 4.5% this year and is down 10% from its all-time closing high of $108.46 in February, according to Dow Jones Market Data.

However, analysts at Evercore ISI believe the recent sell-off presents a buying opportunity.

Kirk Materne, an analyst at the firm, wrote in a research note this week that investors should consider “leaning in” to software stocks, given their attractive valuations and potential for AI-driven growth.

AI monetization strengthens long-term outlook

Materne highlighted five software companies as his top picks: Salesforce, Microsoft, Intuit, Snowflake, and Workday.

He noted that all five are trading below their five-year average forward price-to-earnings ratios, making them more attractive after recent declines.

For instance, Microsoft is trading at 27.9 times forward earnings, compared to its five-year average of 29.5 times, while Salesforce is valued at 25.9 times, down from its five-year average of 40.4 times.

Beyond valuation, Materne pointed to artificial intelligence as a key growth driver for these firms.

Companies like Salesforce are already integrating AI into their platforms, offering tools such as Agentforce, an AI-powered customer engagement tool.

Since its launch in October, Salesforce has closed 5,000 deals for Agentforce, and Materne estimates the product could contribute $1 billion in incremental revenue by 2026.

“While it is super early days — the monetization of Gen AI has begun and will build momentum over the remainder of the year,” he wrote.

“We believe the big are going to get bigger in a Gen AI world and we believe the AI narrative in software will only get stronger as the year progresses.”

Dim financial forecasts, economic challenges pose risks

Despite the positive outlook, some risks remain.

Recent earnings reports from Salesforce, Microsoft, and Intuit included financial forecasts that fell short of analyst expectations, raising concerns about near-term revenue growth.

Additionally, broader economic challenges, including potential business spending slowdowns due to rising tariffs, could pose headwinds for the sector.

Trump’s new tariffs could impact business spending, forcing some companies to scale back technology investments.

However, Materne believes software firms are relatively insulated from these effects.

Many software contracts operate on long-term subscription models, limiting immediate financial risks.

Moreover, software solutions focused on efficiency and automation are likely to remain in high demand, even in a tighter economic environment.

“We believe the setup for software remains favorable when taking a 3-6 month view,” Materne wrote.

While risks persist, Evercore’s analysis suggests that investors willing to weather short-term volatility may find compelling opportunities in software stocks as AI adoption accelerates and valuations remain attractive.

The post Salesforce, Microsoft, and 3 other software stocks Evercore ISI wants you to buy amid market pullback appeared first on Invezz

US stock markets witnessed sharp declines this week as investors reacted to uncertainty surrounding President Donald Trump’s shifting tariff policies.

While analysts debated the impact of trade restrictions, Trump attributed the sell-off to ‘globalists,’ a term he has frequently used to describe individuals, corporations, and nations that he believes undermine American economic interests.

Speaking in the Oval Office on Thursday, Trump dismissed concerns that his tariffs were responsible for the market downturn.

Instead, he claimed that ‘globalist’ forces were resisting his administration’s efforts to reclaim economic power, though he did not specify what those efforts entailed.

His comments have reignited discussions about his broader economic agenda, which prioritises protectionist policies over international economic cooperation.

Tariffs not to blame, says Trump

Despite concerns from economists and investors that the market slide was linked to trade uncertainties, Trump insisted that his administration’s recent moves—including imposing a 25% tariff on Canada and Mexico before granting temporary exemptions—had nothing to do with the financial turmoil.

He maintained that his trade policies were designed to restore economic fairness and that any disruptions were temporary.

“There’ll always be a little short-term interruption,” Trump said, suggesting that markets might experience fluctuations but would stabilise as his policies took effect.

His repeated dismissal of market concerns highlights his administration’s broader stance that prioritises long-term economic restructuring over short-term investor sentiment.

Trump’s economic nationalism

Trump has frequently used the term ‘globalist’ throughout his presidency, framing it as an opposition to his economic nationalism.

While the exact meaning of the term remains vague, he has used it to describe multinational corporations, political opponents, and international economic alliances that he believes weaken American industry.

During his remarks, Trump referenced ‘globalist countries and companies that won’t be doing as well,’ linking them to the market’s struggles without elaborating further.

The term has also been criticised for its potential connections to conspiracy theories, particularly those with antisemitic undertones.

Groups such as the American Jewish Committee have noted that ‘globalist’ is often used as a coded term in such narratives.

Trump has continued to employ the phrase as part of his broader economic rhetoric, positioning himself against what he describes as a global economic system that disadvantages the US.

White House silent on policy impact

The White House did not immediately respond to requests for further clarification regarding Trump’s comments.

However, reports indicate that his administration is considering overhauling its approach to economic partnerships, particularly in relation to NATO allies and global trade agreements.

While Trump has repeatedly stated that his policies aim to benefit American workers, uncertainty remains over the potential consequences for markets and international relations.

Even as markets reacted to shifting trade policies, Trump maintained that the stock market was not his primary focus. “I’m not even looking at the market,” he said, reinforcing his stance that economic restructuring takes precedence over day-to-day fluctuations.

Despite this assertion, investors continue to weigh the impact of ongoing tariff negotiations and broader policy shifts on market stability.

The post Trump blames ‘globalists’ for stock market sell-off: ‘There’ll always be short-term interruptions’ appeared first on Invezz

The US labour market likely continued to add jobs in February, but concerns over trade policies, immigration crackdowns, and federal job cuts are creating an increasingly uncertain outlook.

Economists expect the upcoming Labour Department report to show an addition of 160,000 jobs, up from 143,000 in January, with the unemployment rate holding steady at 4%.

Despite resilience in hiring, businesses are navigating shifting economic conditions, including the Trump administration’s tariff threats and workforce reductions in federal agencies, which could shape employment trends in the coming months.

Hiring stays strong despite pressures

Despite growing economic headwinds, job creation has remained stable.

Employers added an average of 166,000 jobs per month in 2024, a slowdown from 216,000 in 2023 and significantly lower than the 603,000 monthly average recorded in 2021 during the post-pandemic economic recovery.

The February job figures are expected to reflect continued momentum in hiring, particularly in the leisure and hospitality sectors, which rebounded after disruptions caused by wildfires in Los Angeles earlier this year.

The ongoing economic expansion has persisted despite high interest rates, which were initially expected to trigger a slowdown.

The Federal Reserve raised its benchmark interest rate 11 times between 2022 and 2023 to counter inflation, bringing it to its highest level in more than two decades.

However, the economy demonstrated resilience due to strong consumer spending, improved productivity, and increased immigration, which helped ease labour shortages.

Inflation fell to 2.4% in September 2024, allowing the Fed to cut rates three times last year, but further reductions have been delayed as inflationary pressures persist.

Federal cuts and trade risks

The Trump administration’s recent workforce reductions at federal agencies are not expected to impact the February employment report, as the Labour Department’s survey was conducted before the job losses took effect.

However, these cuts are expected to make a visible dent in payroll data for March and beyond.

At the same time, the administration’s approach to trade policy is creating additional challenges for businesses.

Proposed tariff increases on imported goods could lead to rising production costs, which may influence hiring and wage decisions.

Economists caution that such measures could slow job creation, reduce disposable income, and increase inflationary risks.

If businesses react by cutting costs, the impact could be felt across multiple sectors, potentially leading to a more severe labour market slowdown.

Wage growth slows

Economists anticipate that workers’ average hourly earnings rose by 0.3% in February, a decline from the 0.5% increase recorded in January.

While this slowdown in wage growth may be welcomed by the Federal Reserve as a sign of easing inflationary pressure, it is unlikely to prompt an immediate rate cut at the central bank’s next meeting on March 18-19.

Market analysts tracking the Federal Reserve’s decisions indicate that Wall Street traders are not expecting another rate cut until at least May, with uncertainty surrounding inflation trends.

If inflation remains persistent, further delays in rate reductions could affect business investment and hiring decisions in the months ahead.

As economic pressures mount, employers and job seekers alike will be closely watching how policy decisions shape the trajectory of the US labour market.

With trade disputes, government job cuts, and wage fluctuations all playing a role, the stability of the employment sector remains a key concern for the broader economy.

The post US job growth likely remained strong in February, but trade and policy risks cloud outlook appeared first on Invezz

Oil prices rebounded from a three-year low on Thursday as investors resorted to lower level buying after Brent fell sharply in the previous session. 

Market sentiment in the oil sector has taken a pessimistic turn, evidenced by the significant drop in Intercontinental Exchange’s Brent crude oil prices. 

Wednesday’s trading saw a decline of nearly 2.5%, with prices settling below the critical $70 per barrel mark. 

This downward trajectory even led to a brief period where prices reached their lowest point in three years, signaling a concerning trend for oil market participants.

Analysts at ING Group, said in a note:

Rising OPEC supply and prospects for further increases, combined with ever-present tariff uncertainty, pushed the market lower.

At the time of writing, the Brent crude oil contract was at $69.43 per barrel, up 0.2% from the previous close.

The West Texas Intermediate crude oil price on the New York Mercantile Exchange was also up 0.3% at $66.54 per barrel. 

WTI and Brent crude oil prices have fallen to their lowest levels since May 2023 and December 2021, respectively, following a four-session decline. 

Brent crude fell 6.5% to its lowest point since December 2021 on Wednesday, while WTI crude fell 5.8% to its lowest point since May 2023.

According to Geojit Financial Services, the weak outlook in the oil market is likely to continue for the rest of Thursday. 

Tariff threats ease pressure on prices

The initial decline in the market was mitigated as the United States announced its decision to exempt automakers from the previously imposed 25% tariffs. 

This move instilled optimism that the potential adverse effects of the ongoing trade dispute could be lessened.

Furthermore, an insider source privy to the discussions revealed to Reuters that President Donald Trump is contemplating the removal of the 10% tariff currently levied on Canadian energy imports, including crude oil and gasoline, that adhere to the existing trade agreements. 

This potential decision further contributes to the easing of trade tensions and the prospect of a less severe impact on the overall market.

Weak oil prices weigh on producers

The recent decline in oil prices is creating significant challenges for US oil producers, making it economically unfeasible for them to continue with aggressive drilling and production activities. 

This is evident in the current price of WTI crude oil, which is trading below $67 per barrel. 

Furthermore, the forward prices for WTI are even lower, indicating that the market expects oil prices to remain depressed in the future. 

This creates a challenging environment for US oil producers, as they are faced with the prospect of lower revenues and profits.

As a result, many producers may be forced to scale back their drilling and production activities, which could lead to a decline in US oil production.

“Recent price weakness makes it difficult for US producers to “drill, baby, drill,” ING Group analysts said. 

The current trading price of around $63 per barrel for the 2026 calendar reduces the motivation for producers to ramp up drilling operations, according to ING. 

ING analysts added:

If anything, we’re likely to see a bigger pullback in activity. Producers need, on average, a $64/bbl price level to drill a new well profitably, according to the Dallas Federal Reserve Energy Survey. 

US crude stockpiles

US crude oil inventories increased more than anticipated last week due to seasonal refinery maintenance, according to the Energy Information Administration. 

Meanwhile, gasoline and distillate stockpiles decreased because of a rise in exports.

The EIA reported that crude inventories increased by 3.6 million barrels to 433.8 million barrels in the week. This increase significantly surpassed the analysts’ expectations of a 341,000-barrel rise in a Reuters poll.

Additionally, the WTI delivery hub’s stock levels reached their highest point since November due to a 1.12 million barrel increase in crude oil stocks at Cushing.

“Lower refinery rates contributed to the build, with utilisation rates falling by 0.6pp, and crude inputs dropping by 346k b/d week on week,” ING Group said. 

The post Oil prices rebound from three-year lows, but weak market challenges US producers appeared first on Invezz

For years, India’s stock market has been a prime destination for retail investors seeking better returns than traditional savings.

However, after reaching record highs, the market has entered a prolonged slump, erasing $900 billion in investor wealth since its peak in September.

The benchmark Nifty 50 index has been on its longest losing streak in nearly three decades, with foreign investors pulling out funds and earnings failing to support lofty valuations.

Millions of middle-class investors, many of whom entered the market during the post-pandemic boom, are now facing significant losses.

With rising inflation, stagnating wages, and increasing financial pressures, their confidence is being severely tested. The shift in global capital, growing interest in China, and geopolitical uncertainties have only added to the market’s volatility.

Households shift savings to stocks

Six years ago, only one in 14 Indian households invested in stocks.

Today, that number has surged to one in five.

This shift has been driven by government policies promoting financial inclusion, easy access to online trading platforms, and the influence of social media ‘finfluencers’ encouraging market participation.

Systematic Investment Plans (SIPs) have become a popular route for investors, with the number of SIP accounts soaring past 100 million—nearly three times the figure five years ago.

As the market downturn continues, many retail investors are seeing their portfolios shrink. For those who moved substantial savings from bank deposits to equities, the downturn has been particularly harsh, forcing difficult financial decisions.

With fixed deposits offering lower returns, many investors saw equities as the best option for growing their wealth. The market correction has exposed the risks of over-reliance on stocks, particularly among inexperienced investors.

Many are now considering shifting funds back to safer assets, but the losses they have already incurred make it a challenging decision.

Indian traders face big losses

The impact of the market downturn has been most severe for retail traders who took on excessive risks. Many were drawn in by social media influencers promoting high-risk strategies, including trading in derivatives and penny stocks.

This speculative trading has led to widespread losses, with some investors losing their entire capital.

Indian regulators recently stepped in to tighten oversight on futures and options trading after it was revealed that 11 million investors collectively lost $20 billion.

The regulatory intervention came after a surge in retail participation in speculative markets, encouraged by platforms offering easy access to leverage. The crackdown aims to prevent further financial distress, but for many, the damage has already been done.

Some traders who borrowed funds to invest during the pandemic are now facing mounting debt and pressure from creditors. Many have been forced to liquidate their portfolios at a loss, exacerbating their financial troubles.

The current downturn serves as a stark reminder that stock market investments require careful risk assessment and long-term planning rather than speculative bets.

What can we expect in the coming months?

Despite the ongoing slump, market experts believe that the correction is part of a normal cycle.

Foreign investor selling has eased since February, indicating that the worst may be over.

Valuations for many stock indices have now fallen below their 10-year average, which could attract institutional buyers.

The Indian government’s latest budget, which includes a $12 billion income tax relief, is expected to support consumer spending and corporate earnings in the coming months.

Furthermore, the Reserve Bank of India’s stance on maintaining stable interest rates could provide some stability to the markets.

However, global risks remain a concern. Geopolitical tensions in the Middle East and Ukraine, coupled with the uncertainty surrounding US trade policies, continue to weigh on investor sentiment.

While some analysts believe that India’s economic fundamentals remain strong, the immediate future of the stock market remains uncertain.

Financial advisers are urging investors to take a long-term view and avoid panic selling. Many believe that the market downturn is a necessary correction after years of rapid growth.

For investors who entered the market expecting quick gains, this period serves as an important lesson in managing expectations and understanding the risks associated with equities.

The post India’s stock market sheds $900 billion since September as retail investors face a major test appeared first on Invezz