Author

admin

Browsing

President Donald Trump is set to welcome cryptocurrency industry leaders to the White House on Friday for an unprecedented “crypto summit.”

The meeting, a significant nod to the digital asset sector that played a crucial role in his re-election campaign, comes just a day after Trump signed an executive order creating a “crypto reserve”—a national stockpile of Bitcoin.

The initiative has drawn criticism, with opponents arguing that it benefits major crypto investors rather than serving broader national interests.

Brian Armstrong, Michael Saylor among key industry leaders expected to attend

According to CoinTelegraph, over 20 high-profile crypto executives have confirmed their attendance.

The roundtable, scheduled to take place from 6:30 pm to 10:30 pm UTC, will feature key figures from both the private sector and the Presidential Working Group on Digital Assets.

Source: Cointelegraph

Confirmed attendees include Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev, Kraken CEO Arjun Sethi, and Chainlink cofounder Sergey Nazarov.

Strategy Chairman Michael Saylor, a vocal Bitcoin advocate, will also be present, along with Exodus CEO JP Richardson, Bitcoin Magazine CEO David Bailey, and investors such as Matt Huang of Paradigm and Kyle Samani of Multicoin Capital.

Fox Business reporter Eleanor Terrett noted that invitations were sent out by the White House on Friday morning.

However, it remains unclear whether additional guests, including key administration officials such as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, will be in attendance.

Stablecoin regulation, regulatory clarity on tokenisation

Led by White House AI and Crypto Czar David Sacks, the summit is expected to focus on key policy discussions, including digital asset regulation and the mechanics of Trump’s newly announced Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.

Among the influential figures attending the summit, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has arguably played the most pivotal role in shaping the industry’s political standing.

Once focused solely on expanding crypto adoption, Armstrong has in recent years transformed into one of Washington’s most active crypto lobbyists.

Armstrong has made it clear that his priority is pushing forward much-needed legislative reforms.

“From our point of view, the next step in the United States that’s the most urgent is getting legislation passed,” Armstrong told CNBC ahead of the Summit, citing stablecoin regulation and broader market structure reforms as immediate priorities.

His views align with growing bipartisan support in Congress for clearer digital asset laws.

Just this week, the Senate voted to overturn two Biden-era crypto regulations, with Senator Ted Cruz calling the move a gateway for further industry-friendly legislation.

Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev, another prominent attendee, has been vocal about the potential of tokenization to democratize investment access.

In a recent Washington Post op-ed, Tenev argued that blockchain technology could break down barriers in private markets, where access to high-growth companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Stripe remains restricted to institutional investors.

“Crypto technology can unlock new ways to trade and invest in all assets, from digital to real-world,” he told CNBC ahead of the event.

“Tokenization will transform investing, but we need regulatory clarity to make it happen.”

Under current SEC regulations, only accredited investors—individuals with a net worth exceeding $1 million or annual earnings above $200,000—can participate in private markets.

Tenev believes reforming these rules and establishing a clear security token registration framework would level the playing field for retail investors.

Bitcoin-only reserve sparks industry debate

Prior to Trump’s executive order on Thursday, speculation swirled over which cryptocurrencies would be included in the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.

The final announcement confirmed that only Bitcoin would be part of the reserve, despite Trump’s initial Truth Social post mentioning other tokens, including Ether, XRP, Solana’s SOL, and Cardano’s ADA.

The decision led to a sharp market reaction, with SOL, Ether, and Bitcoin each dropping around 5% late Thursday, while ADA plunged nearly 12%.

Trump’s order marks the first time the US government has formally recognized Bitcoin as a strategic asset.

The reserve will be funded exclusively through Bitcoin seized in criminal and civil forfeiture cases, ensuring that taxpayers do not bear any financial burden.

Meanwhile, non-Bitcoin assets seized by the government will be placed in a separate Digital Asset Stockpile managed by the Treasury Department.

With regulatory clarity now a top priority, Friday’s summit could be a defining moment for the future of cryptocurrency policy in the United States.

The post White House Crypto Summit: who’s invited and what’s on the agenda? appeared first on Invezz

US President Donald Trump said Friday that he is “strongly considering” imposing large-scale banking sanctions and tariffs on Russia until a ceasefire and peace agreement is reached with Ukraine.

“Based on the fact that Russia is absolutely ‘pounding’ Ukraine on the battlefield right now, I am strongly considering large-scale banking sanctions, sanctions, and tariffs on Russia,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

He also urged both countries to begin negotiations immediately, warning, “Get to the table right now, before it is too late. Thank you!!!”

Is Trump soft on Russia?

Trump has faced criticism over his approach to negotiations with Russia and Ukraine, with opponents accusing him of being lenient toward Putin.

He has repeatedly and falsely claimed that Ukraine initiated the conflict.

Critics have noted a shift in US foreign policy under President Donald Trump, with the administration said to be taking a more conciliatory approach toward Russia while pressuring Ukraine to negotiate an end to the war.

This marks a departure from the previous Biden administration, which was more supportive of Ukraine and critical of Russia.

Hours before Trump’s statement, Russia launched a large-scale attack on Ukraine, deploying 261 missiles and drones targeting energy and gas infrastructure, according to Ukrainian officials.

The Trump administration also halted military aid and intelligence-sharing with Ukraine this week, following a heated Oval Office exchange last week between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Trump, and Vice President JD Vance.

Tense Oval Office meeting with Zelenskyy

Trump’s remarks come just days after a tense meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the Oval Office.

The encounter, which shifted between polite exchanges and heated discussions, highlighted growing friction between the two leaders over the direction of the war and US involvement.

Zelenskyy sought to secure continued US support as Ukraine struggles against Russian forces, but Trump reiterated his push for a swift resolution, emphasizing his belief that prolonged conflict is unsustainable.

He has repeatedly questioned the level of US aid to Kyiv and suggested that a ceasefire was necessary to prevent further escalation.

During the meeting, Trump reportedly expressed skepticism about Zelenskyy’s stance, arguing that Ukraine must be more open to negotiations.

He also warned that continued fighting could increase the risk of broader conflict. “You’re gambling with World War III,” he told the Ukrainian leader, pressing him on why he was resisting a ceasefire.

The exchange occurred during a meeting where both leaders were signing an agreement that would allow the US to access future revenue from Ukraine’s natural resources.

Recent reports from earlier this week suggest that the deal may eventually get signed.

The post Trump mulls harsh tariffs, banking curbs on Russia until ceasefire appeared first on Invezz

Mexico intends to considerably increase the number of complying companies selling to the United States under a regional trade agreement in the coming weeks, Economy Minister Marcelo Ebrard said Friday, after Washington suspended tariffs on Mexican goods entering the country under the agreement.

At a presser, Ebrard admitted that a segment of enterprises responsible for 10% to 12% of Mexico’s exports may have substantial difficulty in satisfying the standards of the USMCA, alluding specifically to issues in the car sector.

To address these concerns, Mexico intends to engage directly with automakers in the coming weeks to ensure an easier transition to compliance with the agreement’s terms.

The complex rules of origin established by the USMCA require that a certain amount of car parts, as well as the steel and aluminium used in manufacture, be from inside the region.

According to a Reuters report, while major automakers including General Motors, Ford, and Stellantis have campaigned for tariff exemptions for USMCA-compliant items and welcomed the tariff halt, companies that do not satisfy these compliance requirements may face 25% tariffs.

Ebrard also informed that Mexican officials and US trade authorities are set to meet next week to continue the negotiations regarding fresh tariffs on steel and aluminium coming into the US.

USMCA trade landscape

The USMCA significantly altered commercial relations between Canada, Mexico, and the US.

Currently, more than 50% of Mexico’s exports are compliant to the USMCA.

Ebrard expects that portion to reach 85% to 90% in the next weeks as companies adjust to the new trade rules, which might stabilize economic relations between the two nations.

Having more compliance with USMCA rules may result in a more favourable and predictable trading environment.

Potential challenges ahead

The expectation that greater compliance with the USMCA is on the horizon is a positive one, but specific industries may have difficulty adjusting to the new standards.

Ebrard mentioned the auto sector in particular as an area that could face challenges, saying that not all companies would be able to readily pivot to USMCA standards.

The Mexican government aims to negotiate good terms for its economy while also ensuring a robust economic connection between the countries.

Mexico’s President Claudia Sheinbaum stated on Wednesday that the country may seek new trade partners due to rising economic tensions with the US.

Sheinbaum’s remarks come amid growing uncertainty across various sectors of the Mexican economy, particularly in the automotive industry.

According to Goldman Sachs, the US imported $181.4 billion worth of automobiles and auto parts from Mexico in 2024, accounting for nearly 10% of the country’s economy.

These next negotiations between Mexico and the US might be a crucial opportunity for both countries to effectively manage the challenges of international trade dynamics.

The post After US tariff pause, Mexico pushes for 90% compliant exports appeared first on Invezz

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell said Friday that the central bank is in no rush to adjust interest rates, emphasizing that policymakers will wait to assess the impact of President Donald Trump’s economic policies before making any moves.

Speaking at the US Monetary Policy Forum, Powell pointed to ongoing changes in trade, immigration, fiscal policy, and regulation as sources of uncertainty, noting that “it is the net effect of these policy changes that will matter for the economy and for the path of monetary policy.”

Despite growing market expectations for rate cuts later this year, Powell reiterated that the Fed remains in a “wait-and-see” mode, stating:

We do not need to be in a hurry, and are well positioned to wait for greater clarity.”

Market expectations vs Fed’s stance

Traders have increasingly priced in rate cuts, with CME Group’s FedWatch gauge reflecting expectations for three quarter-percentage-point reductions by the end of the year, starting in June.

However, Powell’s remarks suggest the Fed is not committing to a preset path for monetary easing.

“Policy is not on a preset course,” Powell said. “Our current policy stance is well positioned to deal with the risks and uncertainties that we face in pursuing both sides of our dual mandate.”

Fed Governor Adriana Kugler, speaking separately in Portugal, echoed Powell’s caution, citing “important upside risks for inflation” and saying it “could be appropriate to continue holding the policy rate at its current level for some time.”

Fed policymakers are expected to keep the central bank’s key policy rate unchanged at their March 18-19 meeting.

Economic data and inflation outlook

Powell noted that the US economy remains in a “good place” with a “solid labor market” and inflation moving back toward the Fed’s 2% target.

However, he acknowledged ongoing concerns over price pressures, stating, “The path to sustainably returning inflation to our target has been bumpy, and we expect that to continue.”

He also addressed the recent data indicating a rise in consumers’ near-term inflation expectations, but noted that “most measures of longer-term expectations remain stable and consistent” with the Fed’s 2% inflation target.

The Fed’s preferred inflation gauge showed 12-month inflation at 2.5%, or 2.6% when excluding food and energy, with sentiment surveys indicating growing concerns tied to Trump’s tariff policies.

Meanwhile, the latest jobs report showed nonfarm payrolls increased by 151,000 in February, slightly below expectations, while the unemployment rate edged up to 4.1%.

Powell characterized the labor market as “solid and broadly in balance,” highlighting that wage growth continues to outpace inflation, with average hourly earnings rising 0.3% in February and 4% year-over-year.

The remarks indicate that while the Fed is aware of market expectations for rate cuts, policymakers remain cautious, preferring to assess the full impact of Trump’s policies before making any adjustments to monetary policy.

The post Fed Chair Powell signals caution on rate cuts amid President Trump’s policy shifts appeared first on Invezz

President Donald Trump said Friday that he is considering imposing reciprocal tariffs on Canadian lumber and dairy products, citing what he called unfair trade practices.

Speaking from the Oval Office, Trump accused Canada of taking advantage of American farmers through high tariffs on dairy imports.

“Canada has been ripping us off for years on tariffs for lumber and for dairy products. 250% — nobody ever talks about that — 250% tariff — which is taking advantage of our farmers. So that’s not going to happen anymore,” Trump said.

He added that the US could introduce tariffs as soon as Friday or early next week. “They’ll be met with the exact same tariff unless they drop it, and that’s what reciprocal means,” he said.

Escalating trade tensions

Trump’s remarks come at the end of a volatile week in trade policy.

Earlier, he imposed 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada while also doubling levies on Chinese imports to 20%.

On Thursday, he signed executive actions delaying tariffs for nearly one month on all products from Mexico and Canada covered under the USMCA free trade treaty.

The decision followed discussions between Trump and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, as well as negotiations between Canadian officials and the Trump administration.

Although tariffs on Mexican and Canadian goods covered under the USMCA trade agreement have been delayed until April 2, uncertainty remains over the administration’s broader trade strategy.

The US is preparing a set percentage for each country based on existing trade barriers and tariffs on American imports.

Trump’s comments Friday indicated a particular focus on Canadian dairy and lumber, and sector-specific tariffs on metals are expected next week.

Trump defends tariffs

Trump defended his trade policies, claiming they have bolstered US manufacturing, particularly in the auto sector.

“We’ve not only stopped that manufacturing collapse, but we’ve begun to rapidly reverse it and get major gains,” he said, citing the creation of nearly 9,000 auto production jobs.

However, auto industry leaders have expressed concerns about supply chain disruptions from tariffs, especially given the deep integration of North American manufacturing under the USMCA. Some auto-related tariffs were among those delayed until April.

The policy uncertainty weighed on markets, with the Nasdaq 100 Index falling into correction territory on Friday, down more than 10% from its recent high.

Trump, who has previously pointed to the stock market as a sign of his administration’s success, downplayed the decline after markets slumped in response to his tariff plans.

Earlier in the day, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell said Friday that the central bank is in no rush to adjust interest rates, emphasizing that policymakers will wait to assess the impact of President Donald Trump’s economic policies before making any moves.

The post President Trump threatens Canada with dairy, lumber tariffs appeared first on Invezz

Carvana stock price has moved into a bear market after plunging by over 36% from its highest level this year. CVNA has fallen to its lowest level since January 26, giving it a market cap of $46 billion. So, is Carvana a good stock to buy now?

Carvana is growing, but concerns remain

Carvana has become one of the fastest and best-performing companies in Wall Street after surging by over 180% in the last five years. It rose by over 6,300% from its lowest level in 2023, bringing its market cap to over $43 billion.

Carvana stock has jumped after the management successfully handled its debt burden, which threatened its existence a few years ago.

The company has also benefited from strong revenue growth as it continued to gain market share in the US. As a result, its revenue jumped to over $13.6 billion in 2024, up from $10.7 billion a year earlier. 

It has also become a highly profitable company, with the annual figure rising to $210 million. This profitability is because of its cost reduction, with its advertising expense per unit falling by 25% to $550.

Carvana’s stock has also jumped as the management has prioritized profitability over revenue growth. This prioritization has pushed the management to ensure that all vehicles it sells are delivered profitably. 

Carvana has attracted substantial criticism and praise in the past. Most critics point to its valuation and its arrangement with DriveTime, a company started by Carvana’s founder father. Hindenburg Research, a popular short seller company that shuttered its operations this year, accused the company of trade manipulation.

It also accused Carvana of having a toxic loan book, comprising of $15.4 billion in asset-backed securities (ABS) and substantial delinquencies. Carvana has rejected all these claims and maintained that its business was doing well.

CVNA growth continued soaring in Q4

The most recent results showed that Carvana continued doing well in 2024. It sold 416,348 vehicles during the year, a big increase from the 312,847 it sold a year earlier. These vehicles brought in its revenue to $13 billion.

Notably, Carvana’s annual retail units were lower than the 425,237 and 412,296 that it sold in 2021 and 2022. That is a sign that the company is benefiting from higher vehicle prices sold on its platform. Indeed, the gross profit per unity rose to $7,196, up from minus $201 a decade earlier.

The management expects that its business will continue doing well this year. While it did not give a number, Wall Street analysts anticipate that the first quarter revenue will rise by 27% to $3.9 billion. The annual revenue figure will grow by 19% to $16.34 billion, followed by $19.5 billion next year.

The biggest concern for Carvana stock price is that it is still one of the most overvalued companies on Wall Street. It has a trailing P/E ratio of 117.52 and a forward multiple of 69. 

Read more: JPM raises Carvana stock target: how high could CVNA go in 2025?

Carvana stock price analysis

CVNA chart by TradingView

The daily chart shows that the CVNA share price has crashed after peaking at $292.87 earlier this year. It has now plunged by over 30% to $186, and moved below the key support level at $267, the highest swing in November last year. This price was the double-top point. 

The stock has crashed below the 50-day and 100-day moving averages and is nearing the neckline at $175.50, the lowest swing on January 3. Also, the Percentage Price Oscillator (PPO) and other oscillators have all pointed downwards.

Therefore, because of the double-top pattern, there is a risk that it will have a strong bearish breakdown, with the next point to watch being at $150. 

The post Carvana stock price is crumbling: is it safe to buy the CVNA dip? appeared first on Invezz

The Virgin Galactic stock price has crashed to a record low as concerns about its going concern continued. SPCE crashed to a low of $3.36, bringing the year-to-date losses to 42%. 

It has dropped by almost 90% in the last twelve months, bringing its market cap to over $123 million. This means that it has had a $12 billion wipeout as it had a market cap of $13 billion at its peak. So, does Richard Branson’s SPCE have a future?

Virgin Galactic future is at risk

Virgin Galactic is a company that aims to become a major player in the space tourism industry.

Established in the early 2000s, the firm has been building its spacecraft and other equipment through the backing of Richard Branson. 

After conducting successful tests in 2022, the company is now working on its Delta SpaceShip, which will have more capacity. The management hopes that the first spaceship carrying research payloads will blast off in the summer of next year. 

It will then start the first astronaut spaceflights in the fall of next year, while the ship’s assembly will kick off in March this year. 

The company hopes that its space trips will become profitable as it ramps up production in the coming years.

However, the biggest concern is whether Virgin Galactic has adequate cash to last through that period. It ended the last quarter with over $657 million in cash and short-term investments.

While this a big number, the company is still not making any money, and its losses are substantial. It lost over $76 million in the last quarter as its gross expenses rose to $82 million. For the year, the company had a net loss of over $347 million. 

As such, if it loses the same amount this year, it will remain with $310 million in cash, which will not be enough to push it in the next few years. 

Read more: SPCE stock analysis: is it safe to buy the Virgin Galactic dip?

Virgin Galactic has bankruptcy risks

The best source of capital for a company like Virgin Galactic has always been the stock market. In this, the company just issues new shares, a move that dilutes existing shareholders.

The challenge for SPCE is that its equity valuation has dropped to $123 million, meaning that such fundrasing will not be enough. 

Also, Richard Branson has ruled out extending more capital to the company. Most importantly, Virgin Galactic has accumulated substantial debt in the past few years. It has over $2.7 billion in liabilities, with convertible senior notes being $420 million and other long-term liabilities being $68 million. This means that it has substantial bankruptcy risks.

The other challenge is that the space travel industry is highly competitive, with its biggest competitors like Blue Origin and SpaceX having an infinite source of money. 

Read more: Avoid Virgin Galactic stock: buy Rocket Lab instead

SPCE stock price analysis

SPCE chart by TradingView

The daily chart shows that the SPCE share price has been in a strong downtrend for a long time. This sell-off intensified as its cash burn trajectory increased.

SPCE has crashed below the key support level at $5.25, the lowest swing in August 2024. It moved below the descending triangle pattern, a popular bearish sign.

Virgin Galactic stock has remained below the 50-day moving average, while the MACD and the Relative Strength Index (RSI) have continued falling, a sign that the downtrend has the momentum. 

Therefore, the stock will likely keep falling as sellers target the next key support level at $2.5. The only caveat for the bearish view is that SPCE is a highly shorted company, meaning that a short squeeze is possible.

The post SPCE stock price analysis after the $12 billion wipeout appeared first on Invezz

The crypto market remained on edge on Friday as traders waited for the upcoming US nonfarm payrolls (NFP) data. Bitcoin and most coins retreated after Donald Trump announced plans for a strategic BTC reserve that underwhelmed the market. This article looks at three notable coins: Cardano, LUNC, and Pi Network.

Cardano price prediction

Cardano coin has had an eventful week. It initially surged by over 50% on Sunday after Donald Trump revealed plans to include it in US Strategic Crypto Reserves. After peaking at $1.175 on Monday, the coin has now crashed by 25% to $0.9 as investors remain concerned about its inclusion in these reserves.

The daily chart shows that the ADA price has pulled back in the past few days. It has remained slightly above the 50-day and 100-day moving averages, a sign that bulls remain in control. 

The stock also forms a descending channel resembling a bullish flag pattern. This flag is usually a bullish pattern in the market. It has also found support at the 61.8% Fibonacci Retracement level.

Therefore, the ADA price will likely resume the bullish trend as long as it remains above the 50-day and 100-day moving averages. Such a move will point to more gains, potentially to this week’s high of $1.177. A break above that level will signal more gains to last year’s high of $1.32.

LUNC price analysis

The Terra Luna Classic price has crashed in the past few months even as the community continued to incinerate more LUNC tokens. Over 2 billion SHIB tokens have been burned in the last seven days. 

LUNC price was trading at $0.000062, down by 65% from the highest level in 2024. It has remained below the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a sign that the bearish trend is continuing. 

On the positive side, Terra has formed a giant double-bottom pattern at $0.00005386. Its neckline is at $0.00018, the highest swing in December last year. Therefore, LUNC price will have a bullish outlook as long as it is above that support level. Such a move will see it surge to $0.00018, up by 180% above the current level.

LUNC chart by TradingView

Pi Network price forecast

Pi coin price has lost momentum in the past few days as investors remained concerned about the upcoming unlocks. Data shows that it will unlock over 188 million tokens this month and over 1.4 billion this year so far. These unlocks will likely lead to more dilution among existing holders. Worse, Pi Network does not have plans to burn tokens.

Pi Network price has formed a head and shoulders chart pattern, a popular bearish sign. It has also moved slightly below the 25-period moving average on the hourly chart. 

Therefore, the coin will likely have a bearish breakdown in the coming days. If this happens, the next Pi Network price to watch will be at $1.5337, the lowest swing on March 2 and the neckline of the head and shoulders pattern. 

Pi price chart by TradingView

Top catalysts for crypto prices

The main catalyst for these cryptocurrencies will be the upcoming US nonfarm payrolls data and the Trump crypto summit. Economists expect the data to show that the economy created 156k jobs in February this year. 

However, the labor market will continue to soften for a while because of Elon Musk job cuts and the tariff fears. The crypto summit will likely be a sell-the-news event since most of what will be announced has been previewed. 

The post Cardano, LUNC, Pi Network price predictions ahead of Trump crypto summit appeared first on Invezz

Walgreens Boots Alliance will be taken private by Sycamore Partners in a $10 billion deal, the companies announced Thursday, marking the end of nearly a century of public trading for the US pharmacy giant.

The move comes after years of financial turbulence that saw Walgreens’ market value plummet from a peak of $100 billion to just $9.3 billion.

Sycamore will pay $11.45 per share, an 8% premium over Walgreens’ closing price of $10.60 on Thursday.

In addition, shareholders could receive up to $3 per share in cash from future monetization of Walgreens’ stake in primary-care provider VillageMD.

The total transaction, including debt and payouts, is valued at approximately $23.7 billion, according to investment bank Leerink Partners.

Amazon, Walmart, eat into Walgreens’ share

Walgreens has struggled to keep pace with changes in the retail pharmacy landscape, losing ground to competitors such as Amazon and Walmart.

While rivals diversified into insurance and prescription management, Walgreens pursued an aggressive expansion strategy, investing billions into acquiring other pharmacy chains, including European giant Alliance Boots.

However, the shift away from brick-and-mortar retail left the company exposed to declining foot traffic and shrinking drug margins.

The company’s market capitalization has fallen by 90% since 2015, and its debt burden has swelled to nearly $30 billion.

Walgreens reported a net loss of $8.6 billion for the 2024 fiscal year, nearly three times the previous year’s losses.

While the company recently surpassed earnings and revenue expectations in its most recent quarter, analysts say the turnaround remains a long-term challenge.

“You have a business that is shrinking, and then you layer on losses and cash burn, all of that was the perfect recipe for what we are seeing today,” said Brian Tanquilut, a healthcare services research analyst at Jefferies in a Reuters report.

Strategic missteps by leadership compounded woes

Walgreens has spent years exploring potential buyers for parts of its business.

In 2019, private equity firm KKR reportedly offered $70 billion to take the company private, but the talks did not advance.

Now, Sycamore’s acquisition comes at a fraction of that valuation.

The company has also suffered from strategic missteps under former CEO Stefano Pessina, its largest single shareholder.

During his tenure, Walgreens’ market capitalization shrank by nearly half, and its expansion strategy failed to yield long-term gains.

The costly $5.2 billion investment in VillageMD, once seen as a path to healthcare diversification, has now become a financial drain and a potential divestment target for Sycamore.

Meanwhile, Walgreens’ main competitor, CVS, has successfully diversified its business beyond retail, acquiring health insurer Aetna for nearly $70 billion in 2018.

Walgreens reportedly considered buying insurer Humana but ultimately abandoned the idea, a move analysts now see as a missed opportunity.

Sycamore’s turnaround strategy

Sycamore, a private equity firm known for acquiring struggling retail brands, has a history of extracting value through cost-cutting measures, store closures, and asset sales.

The firm has previously acquired brands such as Staples, Talbots, and Nine West, often restructuring their operations to improve profitability.

Analysts expect Sycamore to follow a similar playbook with Walgreens, possibly selling off non-core assets like Boots, its UK-based pharmacy chain, and reducing operational costs across its retail footprint.

“Going private makes sense on paper,” said Ann Hynes, an analyst with Mizuho Bank, adding that Walgreens’ operational challenges would likely be better handled without commitments to shareholders.

Deal structure and potential roadblocks

The transaction includes a 35-day “go-shop” period, allowing Walgreens to solicit alternative bids.

However, analysts believe a competing offer is unlikely given the complexity of the deal.

“Given the size and number of moving parts involved—a potential split of the US business, Boots, and Health—we don’t expect a competing bid to emerge,” said Michael Cherny, an analyst at Leerink Partners.

With Walgreens set to go private, the future of its sprawling global operations remains uncertain.

While Sycamore’s takeover provides an opportunity for restructuring, questions remain about whether the firm’s strategy will lead to long-term growth or simply a short-term financial overhaul.

Investors and industry watchers will be closely monitoring the next steps as one of America’s most storied pharmacy chains transitions to a new chapter under private ownership.

The post Walgreens to go private in $10B deal with Sycamore: how the pharmacy giant fell from grace appeared first on Invezz

Electric vehicle (EV) adoption in Europe is increasing. One would expect that Tesla would be one of the biggest winners of such news.

But the company’s sales are falling across most of its key markets.

The latest figures from Norway, Germany, France, Sweden, and Denmark paint a clear picture: consumers are turning their backs on Tesla in favour of European, Japanese, and even Chinese competitors.

The company that once dominated EV markets is struggling to maintain its position.

This is a situation that not only worries the company’s shareholders, but it also highlights some key insights about the economy and the trajectory of global EV adoption.

The data tells the story

The European EV market is expanding, with battery electric vehicles (BEVs) accounting for 15% of total EU car sales in January 2025, up from 10.9% in January 2024.

BEV sales surged by 34%, with strong growth in Germany, Belgium, and the Netherlands.

Hybrid-electric vehicles now make up 34.9% of new car sales in the EU, making them the most popular choice among buyers.

Plug-in hybrid EVs (PHEVs), however, are in decline, down 8.5% in January, as consumers move toward full electrification.

In Norway, where EVs accounted for 96% of all new passenger car sales in early 2025, Tesla’s sales dropped by nearly half.

The company sold just 1,606 units in January and February, down from 2,887 during the same period in 2024.

Meanwhile, Volkswagen saw a 224.1% increase in sales, Toyota surged by 97.6%, and Nissan grew by 31.3%.

The best-selling EV in Norway was no longer a Tesla but the Toyota bZ4X, followed by the Volkswagen ID.4.

Tesla’s top-selling Model Y saw a staggering 64.4% decline.

Germany, the EU’s largest car market, saw overall BEV sales grow by 53.5% in January.

However, Tesla’s presence has weakened as German automakers ramp up production.

Volkswagen, BMW, and Mercedes-Benz are all gaining ground, particularly as Tesla struggles with the impact of Germany’s subsidy cuts in 2024.

In France, Tesla’s year-to-date sales are down 44%.

The Model Y, which was the country’s best-selling EV in 2024, has fallen to 27th place in 2025, trailing behind the Peugeot 208, Renault 5, and Citroën e-C3.

Meanwhile, overall EV sales in France have remained stable, with domestic automakers benefiting from government incentives.

Sweden and Denmark also show a similar pattern.

Sweden’s BEV market share rose to 31.9% in February, but Tesla sales dropped 42%, with the Model Y down 52.1%.

In Denmark, EVs accounted for 65% of all new cars sold in February, a 72% year-on-year increase, but Tesla’s sales fell by 48%.

These figures make it clear: the European EV market is expanding, but Tesla is heading towards the opposite direction.

What’s really driving Tesla’s decline?

Tesla’s struggles in Europe are not just about numbers. The company is facing multiple challenges that are making it harder to compete.

First, there is more competition than ever. Volkswagen, BMW, Peugeot, Renault, and Toyota are all producing high-quality, affordable EVs that directly compete with Tesla’s lineup.

Many of these models are priced lower, making them attractive to buyers who once defaulted to Tesla.

Government incentives also play a role.

France, for example, has structured its subsidies to favour domestic automakers, making Tesla a less attractive option.

Germany’s abrupt subsidy cuts in 2024 hurt EV demand in general, but Tesla was particularly affected as many buyers had relied on these incentives to make Tesla’s higher-priced models more affordable.

Consumer perception is another major factor.

A recent survey in Norway found that 67% of consumers now have a more negative view of Tesla than before, largely due to Elon Musk’s political beliefs.

While Tesla’s early buyers were attracted to the brand’s innovation and exclusivity, that appeal is fading.

Tesla is no longer a niche brand. It is just another carmaker in a crowded field, and competitors are catching up. Brand fatigue is a real thing.

The brand’s reputation has also taken a hit due to service and reliability concerns.

Tesla ranks poorly in Norway’s Consumer Council and NAF reports, with frequent complaints about customer service and repair times.

Many buyers who once saw Tesla as the best option for an EV now have alternatives that offer better support.

Musk’s growing political controversies are also playing a role. His support for right-wing figures such as Germany’s AfD party and his influence through U.S.

President Donald Trump is alienating European buyers.

Unlike in the US, where Musk’s political influence might not affect Tesla’s market, European consumers are showing signs of disengagement from the brand.

Protests at Tesla dealerships in multiple countries suggest that public perception of the company is deteriorating, and quickly.

Can Tesla recover in Europe?

The company is certainly going to try its best to regain Europe’s trust. Tesla is set to release an updated Model Y, known as “Juniper,” in March 2025.

Historically, March has been a strong sales month for Tesla, and the company is hoping that the refreshed model will help reverse its decline.

However, it remains uncertain whether a facelift alone will be enough to turn things around.

Tesla also stands to benefit from new EU policies.

The European Commission is set to introduce an automotive action plan that includes incentives for electrifying company fleets and new funding for battery manufacturing in Europe.

If Tesla can align with these incentives, it may regain some lost ground.

However, the company still faces major challenges.

Competition will only increase, and European automakers are aggressively expanding their EV lineups. Tesla’s biggest problem is no longer supply; it’s demand.

The European market is changing, and Tesla is no longer the only compelling option.

If Tesla wants to recover, it will need to do more than release updated models. It needs to lower prices, improve service quality, and repair its brand image in Europe.

Otherwise, the decline seen in early 2025 may only be the beginning of a longer-term trend.

History shows that once a brand’s image gets tarnished, it’s incredibly difficult to rebuild.

The fact that Europeans are now embracing EVs while disassociating from the Tesla brand is enough proof that the company has a mountain to climb.

The post Europeans are embracing EVs while Tesla is imploding: here’s why appeared first on Invezz