Author

admin

Browsing

Investing in a stock just before the release of its quarterly financial results can be a risky bet.

However, if you identify companies with a history of beating expectations, the dynamics change.

For those with a sufficient risk appetite, such investments may yield healthy returns within days.

Here are two companies scheduled to report their earnings next week, both known for consistently surpassing expectations.

ServiceNow Inc (NYSE: NOW)

ServiceNow has a track record of exceeding quarterly earnings expectations approximately 90% of the time, with its share price typically rising by around 3.5% following financial releases, according to data from Bespoke Investment Group.

The cloud computing company is set to announce its third-quarter results on October 23rd.

Analysts project earnings of $3.46 per share on $2.74 billion in revenue, representing year-over-year increases of 18.5% and 19.8%, respectively.

Michael Turrin, an analyst at Wells Fargo, holds a positive outlook on the stock ahead of NOW’s earnings report.

His overweight rating, coupled with a price target of $1,025, suggests about a 12% upside from the current price.

“We continue to focus on the highest quality businesses with strong platform positioning, balanced growth profiles, and management teams with proven track records. NOW meets all three criteria,” he stated in a research note last week.

Turrin also noted that ServiceNow stock is well-positioned to benefit from AI tailwinds following the recent launch of Xanadu.

Monolithic Power Systems Inc (NASDAQ: MPWR)

Monolithic Power Systems is another stock worth considering ahead of its upcoming earnings release, as it has a history of beating expectations approximately 88% of the time.

The semiconductor stock typically sees an average rise of more than 2.5% on earnings day, according to Bespoke data.

The consensus estimates MPWR will earn $3.04 per share in its third financial quarter, marking a 22.1% increase from $2.49 per share in the same quarter last year.

Oppenheimer analyst Rick Schafer recently added Monolithic Power to his list of top semiconductor picks, citing its potential to benefit significantly from ongoing demand for AI power solutions.

He noted, “There is a largely binary set-up for the group, with leading AI-exposed companies likely to deliver upside results and outlooks, while most others will be roughly in line, reflecting anemic non-AI demand trends.”

Additionally, shares of Monolithic Power Systems currently offer a dividend yield of 0.55%, providing another compelling reason to consider adding it to your portfolio.

Notably, MPWR has turned a $1,000 investment into nearly $24,000 over the past ten years.

The post These two stocks reporting earnings soon typically beat expectations: should you buy? appeared first on Invezz

The Central Bank of the United Arab Emirates (CBUAE) has granted preliminary approval to AED Stablecoin, bringing the project a step closer to becoming the UAE’s first regulated dirham-pegged stablecoin.

This move follows the CBUAE’s Payment Token Service Regulation framework, which outlines specific licensing requirements for digital tokens.

AED Stablecoin’s in-principle approval positions it as a potential key player in the UAE’s evolving crypto market, where regulatory clarity is seen as essential to the sector’s sustainable growth.

What is AED Stablecoin’s role in the UAE’s crypto market?

AED Stablecoin’s preliminary license enables it to advance plans for issuing a regulated dirham-backed digital currency, known as AE Coin.

This approval is significant as it addresses concerns around restrictions on crypto payments, which arose following the CBUAE’s updated licensing rules.

Under these rules, only licensed dirham-pegged tokens are permitted for payments within the UAE. If fully licensed, AE Coin could serve as a local trading pair on both centralized and decentralized exchanges, allowing merchants to accept it for transactions involving goods and services.

CBUAE’s regulatory stance impacts crypto payments in the UAE

The CBUAE’s licensing framework has introduced stricter rules on crypto usage, particularly for payments.

The framework requires tokens to be pegged to the dirham and licensed, otherwise restricting their use for payments.

This shift aims to bring greater stability and oversight to the UAE’s digital currency landscape.

The approval of AED Stablecoin is viewed as a positive step toward aligning with these regulatory expectations, potentially providing a compliant digital payment solution for local users.

How could AE Coin shape the UAE’s digital finance landscape?

If fully licensed, AE Coin is expected to play a crucial role in the UAE’s digital finance ecosystem.

As a regulated stablecoin, it could facilitate smoother crypto-to-dirham transactions and offer a stable digital alternative for merchants.

This aligns with the UAE’s broader goals of advancing its digital economy while maintaining regulatory standards.

The coin’s integration into crypto exchanges and platforms could enhance the liquidity of the dirham in digital markets, thereby supporting broader adoption among both retail and institutional users.

Competing interests emerge as Tether targets the UAE market

AED Stablecoin is not the only entity eyeing the potential of a dirham-pegged digital asset.

Tether, a major player in the global stablecoin market, has partnered with local firms Phoenix Group and Green Acorn Investments to introduce its own version of a dirham-pegged stablecoin.

Source: Cointelegraph

This move indicates growing interest from international crypto companies in the UAE’s regulatory environment.

AED Stablecoin’s regulatory head start with the CBUAE approval could give it an advantage in building trust with local users.

Crypto exchanges expand as regulatory clarity attracts investments

The UAE’s regulatory clarity has been a magnet for major crypto exchanges looking to establish a foothold in the region.

Recently, OKX launched a retail and institutional trading platform in the UAE after securing a comprehensive license, including permissions for derivatives trading for qualified institutional investors.

Meanwhile, M2, another crypto exchange, has introduced a system enabling direct conversions of dirhams into Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH).

These developments underscore the UAE’s appeal as a hub for digital asset innovation amidst its clear regulatory framework.

The post The Central Bank of the UAE approves AED Stablecoin’s preliminary license appeared first on Invezz

Chancellor Rachel Reeves is preparing for one of the most significant UK budget presentations in years, facing the challenge of closing a £40 billion funding gap.

Economic pressures such as inflation and slow growth have placed the country’s public finances under intense scrutiny.

The question now is whether new taxes or cuts to public services will be used to address the shortfall.

Can new taxes solve the £40 billion shortfall?

The £40 billion gap follows previous concerns about a £22 billion deficit.

With the economy in a fragile state, Reeves’ proposals will have wide-reaching effects on government departments, businesses, and the public.

While concerns about tax hikes loom large, Labour’s manifesto has ruled out increases in income tax, National Insurance, and VAT, leaving limited options for raising the necessary funds.

One likely solution is increasing National Insurance (NI) contributions for employers.

While Labour has ruled out any increases for employees, Reeves has signalled a willingness to impose additional NI costs on businesses.

This could involve raising the current NI rate on salaries (currently at 13.8%) or introducing NI on employer-paid pension contributions at around 2%.

An increase in NI related to pension contributions could generate between £17 billion and £22 billion, while a 1% increase in salaries might raise an additional £8.5 billion.

Together, these measures could cover a significant portion of the funding gap without directly impacting individual taxpayers.

Will fuel duty hike contribute £4 billion?

Another possibility is a long-overdue increase in fuel duty. Frozen for over a decade, this tax could be revisited, particularly as fuel prices decline.

A 10p per litre increase could raise between £4 billion and £5 billion, though the shift to electric vehicles and the planned phase-out of petrol and diesel cars by 2035 would limit long-term revenue.

Capital Gains Tax (CGT) may also be revised, with a focus on aligning taxes on unearned wealth (like dividends) with income tax rates.

Currently, CGT rates are lower than income tax rates (20% for capital gains, and 24% for property).

Raising CGT rates could generate around £6 billion annually. However, Labour has been cautious about increasing taxes on second properties, fearing it could deter property transactions.

Inheritance tax reform is another area Reeves could target, with potential changes aimed at redistributing wealth.

While such adjustments could raise an estimated £3 billion to £5 billion, critics warn that they may discourage investment and have broader economic implications.

Public reaction to these potential tax hikes remains mixed. Many are concerned about their finances amid economic uncertainty.

The opposition is likely to seize on the budget as an opportunity to criticize the government’s approach, questioning the fairness of further financial burdens after years of austerity.

The stakes are high as the budget approaches. The outcome will not only determine the UK’s immediate financial future but could also shape the political landscape for years to come.

How Reeves navigates the £40 billion gap, while balancing public sentiment and economic pressures, will be closely watched.

The post UK budget 2024: which taxes might Rachel Reeves increase? appeared first on Invezz

A recent report from the World Bank highlights a pressing global issue: 8.5% of the world’s population—approximately 700 million people—live in extreme poverty, defined as surviving on less than $1.90 a day.

Despite progress in reducing the proportion of those living in poverty since the 1990s, the actual number of people facing these harsh conditions has remained stable due to population growth, particularly in high-poverty regions such as Asia.

Asia plays a significant role in the global poverty landscape, with countries like India, Bangladesh, and Indonesia housing large populations struggling to access essential services, education, and healthcare.

Statista reports that the World Bank utilizes varying poverty thresholds, with $3.65 per person per day applicable to lower-middle-income countries and $6.85 for upper-middle-income populations.

It is estimated that in 2024, approximately 1.7 billion people (21.4%) and 3.5 billion people (43.6%) will be living under these respective poverty lines.

Source: Statista

Contributing factors to global poverty

Several interrelated factors contribute to the persistence of poverty in Asia.

Rapid population growth, income inequality, insufficient job opportunities, inadequate social safety nets, and environmental degradation are critical drivers of this ongoing crisis.

Rural communities are particularly vulnerable due to limited access to essential services and economic opportunities.

The consequences of poverty are severe, particularly for children who often lack access to education, making them more susceptible to hunger and preventable diseases.

Women and girls typically face the greatest challenges, encountering significant barriers to education, healthcare, and economic advancement.

The dire living conditions in urban slums, especially in countries like India and Bangladesh, vividly illustrate the plight of those trapped in extreme poverty.

To effectively combat global poverty in Asia, targeted policies and collaborative efforts among governments, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and the private sector are essential.

Key initiatives include investing in education and vocational training, promoting sustainable agriculture and rural development, improving healthcare systems, and fostering equitable economic growth, with a particular focus on women, children, and ethnic minorities.

Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and eradicating poverty by 2030 requires nations to tackle the unique challenges faced by regions like Asia.

By implementing targeted policies and promoting inclusive growth, countries can make substantial progress in reducing global poverty and fostering a more equitable society.

Collaboration and concerted efforts are crucial for driving sustainable development and ensuring a better future for generations to come.

The post World Bank report on poverty: 700 million people are surviving on less than $1.90 a day appeared first on Invezz

A group of US lawmakers, including Congressman John Moolenaar, Senator Marco Rubio, and Senator Joni Ernst, have called for an investigation into McKinsey & Company’s failure to disclose its work with China’s government.

In letters addressed to the Department of Justice (DoJ) and the Department of Defense (DoD) on October 17 and made public on Friday, the lawmakers urged a review of McKinsey’s eligibility to continue working with the US government.

The lawmakers expressed concerns over McKinsey’s potential conflicts of interest, especially about US national security.

They cited federal rules requiring the consulting firm to disclose any activities that could pose a conflict of interest, particularly its dealings with China. The letters said,

“Our review of available Department of Defense documentation revealed that, in many instances, McKinsey repeatedly failed to disclose its work with the (People’s Republic of China) government when acquiring DoD contracts.”

McKinsey’s work with US defense and Chinese government

Since 2008, McKinsey has been awarded over $470 million in DoD contracts, including work on sensitive projects such as the F-35 fighter jet program and studies related to US Navy shipyards and advanced microchips.

However, the lawmakers allege that McKinsey failed to disclose its simultaneous advisory work with Chinese government agencies.

In particular, McKinsey has consulted China’s National Development and Reform Commission on its five-year economic plans and worked with Chinese state-owned companies like China COSCO Shipping Corporation and China Communications Construction Company.

The involvement with China’s government agencies while handling US defense contracts has raised red flags regarding national security risks.

McKinsey’s efforts to distance itself from China’s work

McKinsey has attempted to distance itself from its work on China’s five-year plans by attributing the advisory roles to its McKinsey Global Institute and Urban China Initiative.

However, the lawmakers criticized this as “misleading,” asserting that McKinsey effectively controls both entities, thereby maintaining its involvement in China’s strategic planning.

The lawmakers concluded that McKinsey’s activities may pose significant risks to US national security, urging the DoD and DoJ to thoroughly investigate the matter.

McKinsey, the DoD, and the DoJ have not yet commented on the situation.

The post US lawmakers call for investigation into McKinsey’s China ties appeared first on Invezz

Uber Technologies (UBER) stock has done well this year, surging by over 28% and reaching its all-time high. It has risen by 146% in the past five years, giving it a market cap of $166 billion, making it the biggest mobility company in the world.

Uber has achieved this growth through its global expansion and by moving to other industries like food and grocery delivery. This model is significantly different from Lyft, which focuses on ride-hailing in the US. 

Uber has also been wise to exit some of its unprofitable markets early. For example, it exited the Chinese market in 2016 after facing substantial competition from Didi. It acquired a 12.8% in Didi, a company now valued at over $23 billion.

Uber also exited some Southeast Asian countries and took a stake in Grab Holdings (GRAB), a company valued at $14 billion.

What is Grab Holdings?

Grab Holdings is a large company that provides a super app used by millions of users in the Southeast Asian region, one of the fastest-growing places globally. It is available in countries like Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand, and the Philippines, which have a cumulative population of over 677 million people. 

Grab uses the same business model as Uber. Its app lets users request for rides and then it takes a cut from all transactions.

Additionally, the firm has expanded its business to include deliveries and digital financial services. For example, in its app, one can pay utility bills, pay online and in stores, buy insurance, and even save.

Grab, therefore, has become a super app, where millions of people find numerous services, without the need for downloading other platforms.

Most importantly, while all its services are highly competitive, the company has a commanding market share. For example, its ride-hailing business has an approximately 75% market share. Its food delivery business also has a substantial share.

The benefit of having a commanding share is that it can increase prices without losing customers. Also, it can offer more services without spending substantial sums of money on marketing.

Grab’s business is growing

Grab’s business has done well over time as its revenue growth has continued. However, its stock remains significantly below its all-time high as investors focus on its huge losses and the fact that it has little growth prospects internationally. 

Grab’shares peaked at $18 in January 2021 and has tumbled to below $4, bringing its market cap from $22 billion to $14 billion. This crash happened even as its annual revenue moved from $469 million in 2020 to over $2.3 billion.

The most recent results showed that Grab’s business was still growing, albeit at a slower pace than in the past. Its revenue grew by 17% in the second quarter to $664 million as its on-demand Gross Merchandise Volume (GMV) rose by 13% to $4.4 billion.

Uber, on the other hand, reported quarterly revenue growth of 16% to over $10.7 billion, meaning that the two have similar growth rates.

Grab’s financial services business is seeing strong growth. Customer deposits in its application rose by 52% to $730 million, while the amount of loans disbursed last quarter stood at $500 million. Its mobility revenue rose to $247 million, while its financial services figure rose to $60 million. 

Grab is on path to profitability

A key concern for Grab has been its substantial losses over the years. It had a net loss of $3.7 billion in 2019 followed by $2.6 billion in 2020 and $3.4 billion in 2021.

Recently, however, there have been signs that the company is on a path to profitability. Its net loss narrowed to $1.6 billion in 2022 followed by $485 million in 2023. As such, if this trend continues, it may turn profitable in 2025 and continue growing. 

The next key catalyst for the Grab stock price will be its earnings, which are scheduled on November 8. Analysts expect that its revenue will come in at $691 million, a 12.4% increase from the same period last year. 

For the year, analysts expect that its revenue will be $2.74 billion, a 16.4% increase from $2.36 billion. It will then grow to $3.2 billion in 2025.

Read more: As Uber stock thrives, two competitors are holding merger talks

Grab stock price analysis

Grab chart by TradingView

The monthly chart shows that Grab Holdings’ share price has moved sideways in the past two years. 

The stock has formed a rising wedge chart pattern, a popular bearish sign in the market. Also, it has formed a bearish flag chart pattern. Therefore, there are rising odds that it will have a bearish breakout, with the next point to watch being at $2.27, its lowest point in 2022.

In the near term, however, more gains will be confirmed if it moves above the key resistance point at $3.90, its highest point this year.

The post Uber stock surged to ATH: Will Grab Holdings do the same? appeared first on Invezz

The Bank of Canada (BoC) is at a crossroads as it prepares for a pivotal decision next week regarding interest rates, with market expectations split between 25-basis points (bps) and a more aggressive 50 bps cut.

This would mark the fourth consecutive reduction following three earlier cuts.

The BoC’s decision is complicated by mixed signals from inflation data, a shifting labor market, and an evolving economic outlook.

In September, Canada’s consumer price inflation fell to 1.6% year-on-year, dipping below the 2% target for the first time since February 2021.

A significant contributor to this residual inflation is housing costs; excluding these, inflation could potentially drop below 1%.

However, the BoC cannot selectively disregard components, which has made policymakers cautious about easing too aggressively. A major concern is the risk of renewed price pressures if monetary conditions become overly relaxed.

Source: Think.ing

Growth outlook improves despite cooling inflation

Despite moderating inflation, Canada’s economic growth appears resilient.

The latest Business Outlook survey indicates improved sentiment among businesses, with recent GDP and retail sales figures surpassing forecasts.

However, the labor market presents a complex picture: unemployment has increased to 6.5%, up from 4.8% in July 2022.

This rise is not due to job losses but a surge in labor force participation driven by recent immigration.

This increased labor supply could alleviate wage pressures, offering the BoC room to pursue its gradual rate-cutting strategy.

The central bank aims to balance maintaining a neutral policy stance with supporting economic expansion.

Financial markets signal a 50 bps cut with high certainty

The financial markets are leaning towards a more aggressive stance, pricing in a high likelihood of a 50 bps cut for the upcoming policy meeting.

If enacted, this cut would contribute to a total of 83bps of reductions anticipated by the end of December.

In contrast, market expectations for 60 bps of cuts just a week ago highlight the evolving sentiment among investors.

A 50 bps reduction would widen the interest rate differential between the BoC and the US Federal Reserve, creating a spread of 125 bps.

This could exert further pressure on the Canadian dollar (CAD), making imports more expensive and raising concerns among some BoC members about pursuing a larger rate reduction.

Source: Think.ing

Wider US-Canada rate differential could sway BoC’s decision

The potential widening of the interest rate differential between Canada and the US is a crucial factor in the BoC’s decision-making process.

A 50bps cut would amplify this spread, potentially leading to additional downward pressure on the CAD.

A weaker CAD could heighten import costs, adding inflationary pressures that complicate the BoC’s goal of achieving price stability.

Given these dynamics, a 25bps cut may emerge as a more prudent option.

This approach would signal a continuation of easing while mitigating the risk of a sharp decline in the CAD.

However, the decision remains finely balanced, with a 50bps cut still a plausible path depending on the BoC’s inflation outlook.

Dovish expectations drive USD/CAD higher as markets await BoC decision

Since the start of October, the gap between the USD and CAD two-year swap rate has widened from 50bps to 80bps.

This shift reflects dovish rate expectations in Canada against a backdrop of hawkish sentiment in the US.

The widening spread has pushed the USD/CAD rate to 1.38, hindering the loonie’s potential gains amid relative stability among currency crosses, particularly as some market participants position themselves ahead of the upcoming US elections.

The market’s anticipation of a 50bps cut leaves the CAD vulnerable to re-pricing should the BoC opt for only a 25bps reduction.

In this scenario, a short-term appreciation of the loonie is possible as investors adjust to a less aggressive easing path than initially expected.

What will the Bank of Canada decide: a 25 bps or 50 bps cut?

Ultimately, the BoC’s choice between a 25 bps and a 50 bps cut hinges on its assessment of inflation risks, economic momentum, and the impact of a weaker CAD on the broader economy.

A cautious approach would favor a 25 bps cut, allowing the bank to maintain flexibility for future adjustments.

Conversely, a more decisive 50 bps cut could signal a stronger commitment to supporting economic growth.

The upcoming policy meeting will be closely monitored by markets, with significant implications for the CAD and Canada’s economic outlook.

Investors and analysts remain poised for potential volatility as the central bank navigates this challenging environment.

The post Bank of Canada faces tough choice between 25 bps and 50 bps rate cuts appeared first on Invezz

The Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Fund (VIG), WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth (DGRW), and the iShares Core Dividend Growth (DGRO) are some of the most popular dividend-focused ETFs in Wall Street, with $102 billion, $15 billion, and $30.7 billion in assets, respectively.

Good ETFs with solid performance

As their names suggest, these funds are designed to provide their holders with reliable dividends over time. 

The VIG ETF tracks the S&P US Dividend Growers index, which aims to provide investors access to companies that have a long record of increasing their dividends.

Most of its constituent companies are in the tech sector followed by financials, healthcare, industrials, and consumer staples. Some of the top names in the fund are Apple, Broadcom, JPMorgan, UnitedHealth, Exxon, and Visa. 

The WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth fund, on the other hand, invests in companies that have constantly grown their payouts for a long time. Like VIG, most of its constituent companies are in the tech, healthcare, industrials, and financials. The biggest firms in the fund are Microsoft, Apple, Broadcom, AbbVie, and NVIDIA. 

The DGRO ETF is another popular find, which focuses on dividend growth. It tracks the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, which invests in 413 companies. Financials, technology, healthcare, and industrials are the biggest players in the fund, with the top companies being ExxonMobil, JPMorgan, Apple, Microsoft, and Chevron.

These funds have a long track record of doing well. As shown below, the DGRW ETF has had a total return of 107% in the past five years. Similarly, the DGRO and VIG funds have returned 83% and 85% in the same period. The same performance is replicated across other timeframes.

These funds have performed well because they are made up of blue-chip companies that have rallied over time. For example, top constituents in the funds like Broadcom, Microsoft, and AbbVie have a long record of soaring. 

Are they really dividend ETFs?

The challenge, however, is whether these funds qualify as dividend ETFs. In other words, should one invest in them to receive their regular payouts?

The VIG ETF has a dividend yield of 1.7% and a four-year average of 1.78%. Similarly, the DGRW fund has a yield of 1.47% and a four-year yield of 1.88%. The DGRW fund pays 2.16% and a four-year average of 2.25%.

Therefore, in this case, the VIG ETF would pay about $170 in dividends for a $10,000 investment, while the other two would pay $148 and $225, respectively.

However, one needs to include the expense ratio and taxes in the dividend return calculation. VIG and DGRO have an expense ratio of 0.08%, while DGRW charges 0.28%. As such, we see that the total dividend return offered by these funds is almost negligible. 

There are two things to consider when determining whether they are good dividend funds. First, it is the risk-free return, which in most cases, is investing in US government bonds. With the ten-year yielding 4.2%, it means that a $10,000 investment will bring in $420, or more than double what the three funds pay.

Still, these bonds don’t have growth, and there is usually a risk that the yield will fall as the Fed slashes rates. 

Second, the other thing to look is investing in a low-cost index tracking fund like the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% and a dividend yield of 1.26%. It has a four-year average of 1.46%.

The ETF has never marketed itself as a dividend fund, and most of its investors don’t invest it for its dividend. It is simply a fund that tracks the five hundred biggest companies in the fund.

Read more: Love the SCHD ETF? CLM and CRF are better yielding alternatives

Focusing on the total return

Therefore, we have concluded that the VIG, DGRO, and DGRW ETFs are not good dividend ETFs because of their low yields.

At the same time, data shows that an ETF that tracks the S&P 500 index generates better total returns over time. For example, as shown above, the VOO ETF has had a total return of 112% in the last five years.

The DGRW fund has returned 107%, while the DGRO and VIG have returned 83% and 85%, respectively. This means that an investor who allocated funds in the VOO ETF generated better returns than those who invested in the other funds. 

The same trend is happening this year as the VOO ETF has returned 24.24%, while the other three have returned less than 21%.

As such, if you are considering investing for the long term, odds are that you will do better by focusing on the S&P 500 index. Instead, if you are focused on dividends, there are many assets to consider like the BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund and Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust, which pay over 8%.

Read more: Love the utilities XLU ETF? Boost it with some UTG

The post VIG, DGRW, DGRO are popular; but are they really dividend ETFs? appeared first on Invezz

The JPMorgan Equity Premium (JEPI) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income (JEPQ) ETFs have done well this year and are sitting at their all-time highs. The JEPQ fund soared to $55.30 on Friday, up by over 74% from its lowest point in 2023.

Similarly, the JEPI fund approached the key resistance point at $60, a strong 42% increase from last year’s low.  These two funds have also had some strong inflows in the past few months, with JEPI adding $3.29 billion and JEPQ adding $7.7 billion this year. They now have $36 billion and $17 billion in assets.

Leading boomer candy ETFs

JEPI and JEPQ are the two leading boomer candy ETFs, which aim to provide investors with reliable dividends over time. JEPQ has a forward dividend yield of 9.4%, while JEPI yields 7.1%.

These monthly yields are substantially higher than the other popular dividend ETFs like the Schwab US Dividend Equity (SCHD) and the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation (VIG). 

Most importantly, these funds provide a higher return compared to US government bonds, which are yielding less than 5%.

JEPI and JEPQ use a simple approach to generate returns. First, the funds invest a portion of their cash to a group of stocks, benefiting from their uptrend. Second, they then sell call options and take the premium, which they distribute to their shareholders each month.

A call option is an investment that gives traders the right but not the obligation to buy an asset. In this case, if the price falls before the expiry, a trader can ignore the option and buy it at the market price. 

Also, if the price rises, the investor has a right to buy it at the initially agreed price and benefit from the upside.

The covered call option benefits investors by allowing them to profit from the upward trend of their investments. The strategy can also help reduce the downside when there is volatility by taking the option premium.

The main difference between JEPI and JEPQ is the assets they invest in. JEPI has invested in a basket of companies found in the S&P 500 index. Most of these firms are in the technology industry followed by financials, healthcare, and industrials. Some of the top names in the fund are NVIDIa, Amazon, ServiceNow, and Mastercard.

The JEPQ ETF, on the other hand, has invested in the companies in the Nasdaq 100 index, most of which are in the tech industry.

As shown above, the JEPQ and JEPI ETFs have had total returns of 19.25% and 14.90% this year. While this is a good return, they have underperformed the popular benchmark indices like the Invesco QQQM and Vanguard S&P 500 (VOO) ETFs, which have risen by 21% and 24%, respectively.

This performance mean that, despite their strong dividends, the boomer candy ETFs continue to underperform the benchmark indices that track the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 indices. 

Read more: VIG, DGRW, DGRO are popular; but are they really dividend ETFs?

Catalysts for the JEPQ and JEPI ETFs

Several catalysts could push these ETFs higher in the coming months. First, thousands of American companies are expected to publish their financial results in the coming weeks. 

These earnings have already started, with companies like JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley publishing robust financial results. According to FactSet, 14% of the companies in the S&P 500 index have already published their financial results. 79% of these have reported a positive EPS surprise, while 64% have reported a positive revenue surprise. 

The blended earnings growth was 3.4%. While this is a weaker earnings growth than in the last few quarters, it is also the fifth consecutive quarter of earnings growth. Therefore, there is a likelihood that most companies will publish strong financial results.

Second, these funds will likely benefit from the actions by the Federal Reserve and other central banks. The Fed has already delivered a jumbo 0.50% rate cut, and officials signal to several more cuts in the next few meetings. Data by CME shows that the Fed will lower interest rates to about 3.25% by December next year.

Other central banks are also cutting rates. Last week, the ECB slashed rates by 0.25% and hinted that more were coming. In China, the PBoC has also cut rates and unveiled a series of stimulus packages to boost the economy. 

Third, the US election is coming up in the next few weeks. In most periods, stocks show some volatility ahead of the election and then stage a fresh rally as investors embrace the new normal in the market. 

Therefore, the JEPI, JEPQ, and other benchmark ETFs may continue to perform well in the near term. However, as I have written before, if your goal is to generate good total return, then you are safer investing in S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 indices. JEPI and JEPQ are better if your goal is to generate better returns than government bonds and other dividend funds.

The post JEPI and JEPQ ETFs have soared; numerous catalysts remain appeared first on Invezz

Remitly (RELY) stock has underperformed the market this year, falling by over 22% even as the Nasdaq 100 and S&P 500 indices have soared by 20%+ and moved to their all-time highs. 

It remains 47% below its highest level in 2023 and by 72% from its all-time high, bringing its market cap to $2.9 billion. 

Remitly company background

Remitly is an American fintech that enables people to send money locally and abroad easily and cheaply. 

This is a big industry that is also highly competitive. Banks are key competitors since the SWIFT network has made it cheaper and faster for people to send money around the world. On average, a SWIFT transaction takes less than a day to complete. 

The industry also has many competitors like Wise, formerly known as TransferWise, WorldRemit, PayPal, Zing – owned by HSBC -, Torfx, and Xe, among others. 

An emerging competitor in the industry is stablecoins like Tether, USD Coin, and PayPal USD. These stablecoins let people send money globally in a fairly private manner.

Remitly’s key competitive advantage is that it is a mobile-first company, has strong unit economics, a global scale, and a quality technology platform.

Remitly’s business is facing numerous catalysts. The most important one is that the number of people moving from developing and emerging markets to places like the US and in Europe is increasing. 

Data shows that the US population has jumped by over 10 million under Joe Biden. This trend will continue regardless of who is in the White House since Congress has struggled to pass a comprehensive immigration bill.

Analysts believe that even the most comprehensive bill will not solve the immigration crisis in the US because of the many loopholes. 

Remitly benefits from this crisis because most of its business is where immigrants in the US send money back home. A report by the World Bank shows that remittances to low- and middle-income countries rose to $656 billion in 2023. The bank expects that these inflows will jump by 2.3% this year. 

The other catalyst is the fact that the American economy has avoided a hard landing, with wage growth remaining strong. A stronger economy leads to an incentive for immigrants to send money.

Growth is continuing, and profitability is in sight

Remitly has had strong growth in the past few years. Data shows that the number of quarterly active customers rose from just 948k in the fourth quarter of 2019 to over 6.9 million in the last quarter, a trend that will continue.

Additionally, the company’s send volume has risen from over $7 billion in 2019 to over $39 billion in 2023. The company hopes that the figure will cross $50 billion this year. 

Send volume is an important metric because Remitly makes its money by taking a small cut for each cash it handles.

The most recent financial results showed that its send volume increased to $13.2 billion in the second quarter, pushing its revenue up by 38% to over $306 million. 

Most importantly, Remitly’s net loss has continued to narrow. It lost $12.1 million, a big improvement from $18.9 million a year earlier. 

The closely watched adjusted EBITDA rose to $25.1 million from $20.4 million in the previous quarter. 

The management expects that its annual revenue will jump to between $1.23 billion and $1.25 billion this year, a 32% increase from 2023. Its adjusted EBITDA will be between $85 million and $95 million. 

According to Yahoo Finance, analysts expect that its loss per share will improve from 65 cents in 2023 to 31 cents this year. This loss will then narrow to $0.05 next year, bringing the company to profitability by 2026. 

Remitly will be able to continue growing without the need for raising capital. It ended the last quarter with $185 million in cash and short-term investments and just $15 million in debt. 

Assuming that Remitly’s net profit margin stabilises at the industry median of 22.5% in the future, it means that its $1 billion in annual revenue will translate to a $200 million annual profit. This means that its hypothetical P/E ratio is just 14.5, which is lower than the S&P 500 average of 21.

The next key catalyst for the Remitly stock will be its earnings, which are expected to happen on October 31st.

Remitly stock price analysis

RELY chart by TradingView

The daily chart shows that the RELY stock price has been in a strong bull run in the past few days. It has risen above the 50-day moving average and is nearing the 23.6% Fibonacci Retracement point at $15.40.

The stock is also sitting at the key point at $15, the neckline of the slanted double-bottom chart pattern. Also, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) and the MACD indicators have pointed upwards.

Therefore, the stock will likely continue rising, with the next point to watch being at $20, the 50% retracement point. 

The post Remitly stock has multiple catalysts and could surge soon appeared first on Invezz