Germany has made it clear that it will hold onto its remaining shares in Commerzbank for the foreseeable future, affirming that the bank’s strategy remains focused on maintaining its independence.

This was confirmed by Germany’s Finance Agency on Friday, indicating the government’s current stance against a takeover of the country’s second-largest bank.

This announcement follows closely on the heels of Italian lender UniCredit’s unexpected acquisition of a 9% stake in Commerzbank, making it the second-largest shareholder.

UniCredit’s CEO Andrea Orcel has openly expressed his interest in potential mergers, adding to the speculation surrounding Commerzbank’s future.

However, the surprise purchase by UniCredit, internally known as ‘Flash’ after Orcel’s dog, has raised alarms within Berlin.

The acquisition was met with resistance from both labor unions and Commerzbank itself, prompting the bank to outline a defensive strategy against any immediate changes.

Government urged to hold Commerzbank stake

Germany’s government, which still holds 12% of Commerzbank after recently selling 4.5% of its shares to UniCredit, has a crucial role in any future merger discussions.

Despite this, key stakeholders, including union leaders and Commerzbank management, have urged the government to refrain from further share sales.

During a Friday meeting, officials from the Finance Agency, which oversees government-held assets, concluded that no additional shares would be sold “until further notice.”

A spokesperson for Commerzbank reaffirmed the bank’s current approach to CNBC, stating:

Commerzbank is a stable and profitable institute. The bank’s strategy is geared towards independence. The Federal government will accompany this until further notice by maintaining its shareholding.

Orcel has expressed his intention to pursue merger talks, arguing that such a move could create a “stronger competitor” in Germany’s banking sector.

His statement comes at a time when European banks are grappling with the need to become more competitive, especially against larger US and Asian financial institutions.

However, several challenges stand in the way of such a merger. European cross-border banking deals have faced obstacles for years due to weak profitability, which has left many banks hesitant to engage in mergers.

Additionally, regulatory hurdles and political preferences for national banking champions have made such deals even more complicated.

Political hurdles delay UniCredit’s potential Commerzbank takeover

Although UniCredit has made significant strides in recent years—largely due to a strong financial recovery that distinguishes it from its competitors—political dynamics remain a significant barrier to cross-border mergers.

Anke Reingen, a banking analyst at RBC, informed CNBC that a UniCredit takeover bid for Commerzbank is not off the table but is unlikely to happen soon.

She said:

We do not think a deal is off the table, forever, but any move is likely to be later than we had initially expected.

The decision to maintain the government’s Commerzbank shares comes with a broader implication: it extends the current 90-day lockup period established when the share sale to UniCredit was completed.

According to insiders familiar with the situation, this ensures the government’s continued involvement in the bank for the foreseeable future.

The post Germany to retain Commerzbank shares as bank strives for independence appeared first on Invezz

Lufthansa is considering canceling its daily Frankfurt-to-Beijing flights due to rising operational costs and increasing competition from Chinese airlines.

This route, a staple for the German carrier, is becoming financially unsustainable.

While Lufthansa also operates a daily Munich-to-Beijing flight, that route remains unaffected for now, but a decision on the Frankfurt route could be made as early as next month.

Competitive landscape

Chinese airlines are rapidly expanding their presence on international routes, including a significant increase in flights to Europe, which is putting intense pressure on local carriers.

With lower operational costs, fewer regulatory hurdles, and strong government support, Chinese airlines are gaining a competitive edge over their European counterparts.

European airlines, in contrast, face a host of challenges—higher taxes, strict regulations, and aging infrastructure that complicates operations.

The global political landscape further exacerbates the problem.

The ongoing war in Ukraine has forced European airlines to take longer, costlier detours to avoid Russian airspace, making these routes less profitable.

Chinese airlines driving others out of business

The Chinese government’s backing of its airlines is no secret, and it’s giving these carriers a significant advantage over international competitors.

State support has enabled Chinese airlines to outcompete others, forcing some carriers to discontinue routes to China altogether.

Singapore Airlines recently halted flights to two Chinese cities, while Australia’s Qantas suspended its Sydney-to-Beijing route earlier this year.

In Europe, British Airways is set to end its Beijing service next month, and Virgin Atlantic has already discontinued its profitable UK-to-Shanghai flights, a route that was a major revenue driver for 25 years.

While each airline has its reasons for cutting routes to China, the common thread is clear: they can no longer compete with the state-supported Chinese airlines.

Can European airlines compete?

Since last summer, Chinese airlines have increased their flights to Europe by 74%, while European carriers are struggling to hold their ground.

The disparity in operational efficiency, exacerbated by geopolitical issues, is widening.

Chinese airlines are free to fly through Russian airspace, shaving hours off their routes to Europe and significantly lowering their costs—a luxury European airlines don’t have.

For now, it seems European airlines are retreating, conceding more and more routes to their Chinese counterparts.

Whether they can regroup and reclaim these routes in the future remains uncertain.

Given the current cost advantages and strategic positioning of Chinese airlines, it’s hard to envision a scenario where European carriers can mount a successful comeback.

Without significant intervention or innovation, Europe’s airlines risk losing these critical routes to China, which could solidify Chinese dominance in the aviation industry.

The post Lufthansa weighs flight cuts as state-backed Chinese airlines disrupt European aviation appeared first on Invezz

Rivian Automotive Inc. (NASDAQ: RIVN) saw its shares drop by 7.5% to $12.17 during Friday’s trading session, reflecting a broader market pullback after a recent rally.

The decline comes on the heels of the Federal Reserve’s unexpected decision to cut interest rates, marking the first reduction in over four years.

This move had initially buoyed Rivian’s stock and the wider market, but investors are now recalibrating their expectations amid economic uncertainties.

Rivian stock and Fed’s rate cut

On Wednesday, the Federal Reserve announced a 50 basis point cut in interest rates, lowering the federal funds rate to a range of 4.75% to 5%.

This policy shift signals a potentially more aggressive monetary easing cycle, which is expected to lower borrowing costs for businesses.

For Rivian, a prominent player in the electric vehicle (EV) sector, this could suggest a more favorable financial outlook.

However, despite the immediate positive response from the markets, the company still faces significant challenges.

Rivian remains in a critical growth phase and has yet to achieve profitability.

Although lower interest rates can ease some financial burdens, they do not eliminate the substantial capital expenditures required for manufacturing expansion, supply chain enhancements, and ongoing research and development—especially in a highly competitive industry.

The Federal Reserve’s Summary of Economic Projections hinted at rising unemployment rates through 2025, raising concerns about potential economic slowdowns.

This could adversely impact consumer demand for high-priced luxury EVs like Rivian’s R1T truck and R1S SUV.

Despite more favorable financing conditions, analysts worry that a sluggish economy may dampen sales, presenting hurdles for revenue growth.

What analysts think about Rivian Stock

Despite these challenges, Wall Street analysts generally maintain an “Outperform” rating on Rivian Automotive.

Notably, Colin Langan from Wells Fargo is particularly bullish, projecting an 80% increase in the stock over the next year.

Over the past three months, Rivian’s stock has risen by 19.48%, signaling a positive shift in investor sentiment based on improved business fundamentals.

However, Rivian is still projected to report an earnings per share (EPS) of -$0.90, which is a 24.37% increase compared to the same quarter last year.

Revenue forecasts for the upcoming quarter stand at $1.1 billion, reflecting an 18.09% decline from the previous year.

For the full year, Zacks Consensus Estimates project earnings of -$4 per share and revenue of $4.77 billion, marking increases of 18.03% and 7.67%, respectively.

These revisions in analyst estimates are crucial as they often correlate with stock performance, providing insight into market sentiment regarding Rivian’s financial health.

Challenges for Rivian

While the electric vehicle market is experiencing slower growth than in previous years, Rivian faces additional headwinds.

The company’s cost structure is misaligned with its production capacity, necessitating a cash influx before the anticipated launch of its R2 model.

As Rivian navigates these complex challenges, investors will be watching closely to see how the company adapts to shifting market dynamics and economic pressures.

Rivian (RIVN) stock may currently be in a challenging phase, but its long-term potential hinges on its ability to manage costs and adapt to evolving market conditions.

The post Rivian (RIVN) stock: EV maker’s shares slip despite Fed’s rate cut appeared first on Invezz

In a surprising move that could reshape the semiconductor industry, Qualcomm has reportedly approached Intel about a potential takeover, according to a recent Wall Street Journal report.

The news follows Intel’s recent struggles to stay competitive in the fast-growing artificial intelligence (AI) chip market, a sector Qualcomm has been aggressively pursuing.

While the prospect of such a merger remains uncertain, it has already sparked market reactions, with Intel’s stock rising and Qualcomm’s shares dipping.

A deal of this magnitude would have significant implications for both companies and the broader chipmaking industry.

According to the WSJ report, Qualcomm, known for its dominance in smartphone chips, recently explored acquiring Intel, a storied Silicon Valley giant that has faced mounting challenges in adapting to the AI-driven future of chipmaking.

Intel has long been a leader in the PC chip market but has struggled to keep up with rivals like Nvidia and AMD in the AI sector.

An acquisition could allow Qualcomm to leverage Intel’s extensive manufacturing capabilities and further its ambitions in AI.

Intel’s stock reacted positively to the news, climbing 3.3% following the report, while Qualcomm saw a 2.9% decline.

With a market capitalization of $188 billion, Qualcomm is currently worth nearly twice as much as Intel, positioning it well for a potential takeover.

However, the size and complexity of such a deal would likely attract significant regulatory scrutiny, especially given antitrust concerns.

Intel’s struggles and missed opportunities

Intel has been grappling with a series of challenges in recent years, most notably in its manufacturing division.

The company, once a dominant force in the semiconductor industry, has fallen behind its competitors, particularly in AI chip production.

Missteps, including its decision to pass on an early investment in OpenAI, have compounded its difficulties.

As a result, Intel has lost significant market share to Taiwan’s TSMC and missed out on the explosive growth in AI chips that companies like Nvidia have capitalized on.

Since the start of August this year, Intel’s stock has slumped by 25% following announcements of major layoffs, with over 15% of its workforce being cut, and a suspension of its dividend.

The company is currently attempting a turnaround by focusing on AI processors and building out its chip contract manufacturing business, also known as its foundry.

However, these efforts have yet to pay off as Intel continues to struggle with its transition into the AI-driven chip market.

Qualcomm-Intel merger? Potential regulatory hurdles

Qualcomm’s business model differs significantly from Intel’s.

While Intel has historically manufactured its chips in-house, Qualcomm outsources production and licenses intellectual property from Arm Holdings.

This distinct difference could provide Qualcomm with an advantage, especially as Intel continues to falter in the highly competitive AI sector.

However, a potential Qualcomm-Intel merger could face regulatory challenges.

The size and scope of such a deal would likely trigger antitrust reviews, particularly in the US and Europe.

Additionally, reports suggest Qualcomm may explore selling off portions of Intel’s business to other buyers to alleviate regulatory concerns.

Intel to be removed from Dow Jones Industrial Average?

Adding to Intel’s woes, analysts and investors have speculated that the company could be removed from the Dow Jones Industrial Average due to its poor performance.

Intel’s shares have declined 56% this year, making it the worst performer in the index and the company with the lowest stock price on the price-weighted Dow.

Despite its struggles, Intel has made some recent headway in securing contracts for its foundry.

Notably, Amazon Web Services has signed up as a customer for custom AI chips, offering a glimmer of hope for Intel’s recovery.

A Qualcomm-Intel merger would be one of the biggest deals in tech history, with far-reaching consequences for the semiconductor industry.

For Qualcomm, the acquisition could accelerate its AI ambitions and give it control over Intel’s extensive chipmaking infrastructure.

For Intel, the deal could represent a lifeline in its efforts to reinvent itself amid fierce competition.

However, with significant regulatory hurdles and market uncertainty, it remains to be seen whether this potential deal will come to fruition.

The post Qualcomm approached Intel for a takeover, WSJ reports appeared first on Invezz

Discount retailers like Dollar Tree (DLTR) and Dollar General (DG) are some of the worst performers in the S&P 500 index this year. DLTR has slumped by 50% in 2024, bringing its market cap to $15.8 billion while DG has slumped by over 36%. 

Specialty retailers are struggling

Other discount companies are not doing well. Big Lots has filed for bankruptcy while Five Below (FIVE) stock has plunged by 55%, valuing it at $5 billion. 

This performance is a harsh reversal for companies that did well a few years ago as soaring inflation pushed people to their stores. 

Most notably, their plunge has also coincided with the sell-off among other specialty retailers. Ulta Beauty, which focuses on beauty products, and which counts Warren Buffett as an investor, has dropped by almost 18% this year.

Specialty pharmaceutical companies are also struggling. Walgreens Boots Alliance (WBA) stock plunged so hard that it was kicked out of the blue-chip Dow Jones Industrial Average while CVS Health has dropped by over 27%. Rite Aid, which used to be the third-biggest player in the industry, has filed for bankruptcy. 

On the other hand, leading retail brands are thriving. Walmart stock has soared to a record high, giving it a market cap of over $600 billion. As a result, three of the Walton family appear among the top 20 of the world’s richest people with a combined net worth of over $300 billion.

Costco stock has also jumped to its highest level on record while BJ’s Wholesale Club has jumped by 21.50% this year, valuing it at over $10 billion. 

This performance means that more shoppers are favoring large brands at the expense of the specialty companies like Dollar Tree and Dollar General.

Dollar General’s weak earnings growth

Dollar General has had a good top-line performance in the past few years as high inflation has pushed more people to discount stores. As a result, its annual sales jumped from over $27 billion in 2020 to over $38 billion last year. 

However, high inflation meant that the company had little room to adjust its prices since it prices most of its products for just a dollar. Also, the company has seen substantial wage inflation as the average wage growth in the US has jumped.

As a result, while its top-line growth jumped, its annual profit slowed from $1.7 billion to $1.6 billion in the same period. 

The most recent results showed that its net sales rose by 4.2% to $10.2 billion while its same-store sales rose by 0.5%. However, its operating profit dropped by 20.6% to $550 million while its forward guidance was weaker than expected. In a statement, the CEO said:

“Despite advancing several of our operational goals and driving positive traffic growth, we are not satisfied with our financial results, including top line results below our expectations for the quarter.”

Dollar Tree’s weak financial results

Like Dollar General, Dollar Tree’s revenues have soared from over $23 billion in 2020 to over $30.5 billion in 2023. Its profitability has also come under pressure, with its net profit moving from $827 million to a $998 million loss last year. Its loss in the trailing twelve months stood at over $1 billion.

Dollar Tree, the parent company of Family Dollar, said that its same-store net sales rose by 1.3% while its consolidated net sales rose by just 0.7% to $7.3 billion. It also reduced its forward guidance for the year, with sales expected to be between $30.6 billion and $30.9 billion.

The most notable statement was that the company was considering strategic alternatives for the struggling Family Dollar business, which it acquired in 2015 for $8.5 billion. With the combined entity now valued at $15 billion, there are concerns that the purchase has not worked out as planned. The CEO also warned about the challenging environment, saying:

“We are encouraged by the continuous progress we are making in the transformation underway at Dollar Tree and Family Dollar, despite immense pressures from a challenging macro environment.”

Outlook for Dollar General and Dollar Tree

The ongoing slump of DLTR and DG stocks has left companies that are trading at a significant discount compared to the market and their peers.

Dollar General trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 14.8 while Dollar Tree have multiples of 13.7. These valuations are significantly lower than the S&P 500 P/E multiple of 21 and Walmart’s 32.

I believe that these companies are going through a cycle, which has been driven by inflation and weak consumer spending. Many consumers have also embraced popular subscription products like Walmart+ and Amazon Prime, which ensure free deliveries.

Therefore, the current volatility and downtrend may continue for a while. However, the stocks will likely bounce back in the long term as the macro climate improves.

The post Why are Dollar Tree and Dollar General stocks falling apart? appeared first on Invezz