Author

admin

Browsing

UK retailers are bracing for a significant cost increase in 2025, estimated at £7bn, due to higher employer national insurance contributions, the rise in the national living wage, and new packaging levies introduced in the government’s recent budget.

The British Retail Consortium (BRC) and industry leaders have estimated an average 4.2% rise in food prices in the latter half of the year, while non-food items are likely to see price rise in line with inflation at 2.6%.

Helen Dickinson, the chief executive of the BRC said,

As retailers battle the £7bn of increased costs in 2025 from the budget, including higher employer national insurance, national living wage, and new packaging levies, there is little hope of prices going anywhere but up.

“The government can still take steps to mitigate these price pressures, and it must ensure that its proposed reforms to business rates do not result in any stores paying more in rates than they do already,” she added.

The rising costs stem from fiscal measures announced in Rachel Reeves’s October budget, which include hikes in national insurance and a significant increase in the national living wage.

Additionally, new packaging levies will add further expenses.

Next raises prices, Tesco and M&S refrain

Fashion and homeware retailer Next has announced a 1% price increase for 2025, citing a £67m rise in wage costs.

The company is among the first to signal price adjustments to offset higher operating expenses resulting from the government’s fiscal policies.

M&S is facing an extra £120 million ($148 million) wage and tax bill. Chief Executive Officer Stuart Machin has previously vowed to absorb the costs, saying its supermarket division had no plans to raise prices.

The retailer said Thursday that the outlook for economic growth, inflation, and interest rates is still uncertain and it faces higher costs, but it will make further progress with its turnaround plan this year.

As the UK’s biggest private-sector employer, Tesco is expected to face the largest bill from the payroll tax increase, though it has said it will offset as much of the budget’s impact as it can through cost savings and automation.

Despite this, temporary price reductions during the holiday season provided some respite for consumers.

The BRC-NielsenIQ shop price index reported a 1% fall in prices during December, driven by Black Friday discounts.

However, these short-term cuts masked the broader inflationary trend.

Inflationary pressures persist as consumer costs climb

While December brought some relief, with lower inflation compared to the previous year, rising costs for essentials like food and skincare products pushed household spending on festive groceries to record highs.

Kantar’s data showed food price inflation reaching 3.7% in December, the highest since March.

Supermarkets, including Tesco, Sainsbury’s, and Lidl, reported strong sales during the holiday season but are expected to carefully manage inflationary pressures in 2025.

“Food inflation is going to build in the UK in 2025,” said Clive Black, the head of consumer research at Shore Capital, which like the BRC is forecasting inflation of more than 4% by December.

Despite the increased costs faced by retailers, “the supermarkets will seek to remain shoppers’ champions”, Black said, predicting that the trading environment will remain competitive.

Calls for government action grow louder

With inflation steadily climbing since mid-2024, retailers warn of its long-term impact on consumer spending.

Mike Watkins, head of retailer and business insight at NielsenIQ, noted that “higher household costs are unlikely to dissipate anytime soon,” urging retailers to navigate these challenges while maintaining competitive pricing.

The BRC and industry leaders are calling on ministers to take decisive steps to alleviate tax burdens and reform business rates to ensure sustainable operations for UK retailers and protect consumers from further price hikes.

The post UK retailers warn of price hikes in 2025 as £7bn cost surge looms appeared first on Invezz

President-elect Donald Trump on Tuesday announced a $20 billion investment in US-based data centers by Hussain Sajwani, the billionaire founder of DAMAC Properties and a close business associate of the Trump family.

The investment is aimed at supporting advancements in artificial intelligence, cryptocurrency, and other sectors driving the digital economy.

Trump announced at a press conference, emphasizing his ability to attract substantial investments into the United States.

“Sajwani was inspired by the election results and made this commitment because of it,” Trump stated, adding that his administration would streamline regulatory approvals for large-scale investments.

Hussain Sajwani’s expanding global portfolio

DAMAC Properties, a leading private developer in the UAE, is known for its luxury real estate projects, including the Trump International Golf Club in Dubai.

Sajwani’s $20 billion commitment marks his company’s first venture into US-based data centers, a sector projected to see $1 trillion in domestic investment over the next five years.

The planned data centers will complement DAMAC’s existing EDGNEX portfolio, which includes facilities in the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Spain.

This investment highlights Sajwani’s strategic shift toward digital infrastructure, which plays a crucial role in AI, blockchain, and cloud computing.

Trump-Sajwani relationship under the spotlight

Sajwani’s close ties with Trump have fueled speculation about the role of personal relationships in securing such large-scale deals.

The two have collaborated on numerous projects, including the Trump-branded golf club in Dubai and discussions of a Trump Tower in the UAE.

Although plans for a $2 billion partnership between DAMAC and the Trump Organization after Trump’s first electoral victory did not materialize, Sajwani has publicly credited Trump’s presidency for raising his company’s global profile.

A boost for AI, crypto, and US digital infrastructure

The new data centers will support emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and cryptocurrency, which require significant processing power.

These facilities are expected to bolster the US’s position as a global leader in digital innovation.

Sajwani, who joined Trump at the press conference, said, “Trump’s vision for the US economy aligns with my company’s expansion goals.

This partnership represents a significant milestone for DAMAC Properties and our entry into the U.S. technology sector.”

The announcement comes amid DAMAC’s broader global ambitions.

Recent ventures include a Trump-branded golf course in Oman and potential developments in Saudi Arabia.

A Trump Tower in Dubai is also under consideration, signaling continued collaboration between the Trump Organization and DAMAC.

The post Trump announces $20B investment by Emirati billionaire Hussain Sajwani, boosting AI and crypto growth appeared first on Invezz

In a boost for Latin America’s crypto sector, over 285,000 Peruvians have adopted the Lemon app since its launch in August 2024.

This rapid growth coincides with Bitcoin’s surge to $100,000 by December 2024 and the Central Bank of Peru’s initiatives to improve financial interoperability.

Lemon’s popularity stems from its user-friendly features, allowing seamless currency swaps between soles and cryptocurrencies.

Users also earn Bitcoin rewards for daily purchases, such as groceries or coffee, making cryptocurrency accessible for everyday transactions.

The app’s QR code payments and phone-based transfers simplify the process for users unfamiliar with crypto, driving its widespread appeal.

During its launch week, Lemon became the top finance app in Peru, a trend that continued throughout 2024.

The app processed over $90 million in soles transactions within the year, highlighting its growing role in the local financial landscape.

December alone saw record-breaking transaction volumes and a surge of new users entering the Bitcoin ecosystem.

Federico Biskupovich, Lemon’s operations head, attributes this growth partly to speculation that Bitcoin might be added to US strategic reserves in 2025, boosting its image as a secure digital asset.

This aligns with the global rise in Bitcoin adoption, encouraging more Peruvians to explore cryptocurrency as a viable financial option.

Lemon’s success reflects a larger shift in Peru’s financial habits, as digital currencies gain traction.

Supported by the Central Bank and Lemon’s market strategies, Peru is emerging as a leader in integrating crypto into everyday life.

As this momentum continues into 2025, Peru could serve as a model for other nations looking to embrace digital currencies, fostering innovation and expanding financial inclusion across emerging markets.

The post Over 285,000 Peruvians join Lemon app in 2024 as LATAM cryptocurrency boom accelerates appeared first on Invezz

President-elect Donald Trump sparked global controversy on Tuesday by stating that he would not rule out the use of military force to gain control of the Panama Canal and Greenland, deeming both territories vital to US national security.

Trump’s vision for a “golden age of America”

Addressing reporters, Trump underscored the strategic importance of both regions, saying, “The Panama Canal is vital to our country,” and adding, “We need Greenland for national security purposes.”

Asked whether he would commit to peaceful means, Trump declined to rule out military options, stating, “It might be that you’ll have to do something.”

Greenland, an autonomous territory of Denmark and home to a major U.S. military base, has long been a focus of Arctic geopolitics.

Trump cast doubts on Denmark’s sovereignty over Greenland, suggesting its acquisition would bolster US security.

Meanwhile, the Panama Canal, under Panamanian control since 1999, remains a critical waterway for global commerce.

Trump characterised his vision as part of a broader effort to usher in a “golden age of America.”

His comments, however, have sparked unease among allies and raised questions about the potential implications for U.S. foreign policy under his administration.

US allies not impressed by Trump’s ideas

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen reaffirmed her country’s strong alliance with the United States but dismissed any notion of U.S. annexation.

“The United States is Denmark’s most important and closest ally, but any interest in Greenland must be respectful of the Greenlandic people,” Frederiksen said in an interview.

She stressed that Denmark and the US must maintain cooperation within NATO.

Greenland’s government issued a statement clarifying that Donald Trump Jr, who recently landed in Nuuk, was visiting as a private individual, and there would be no official meetings.

Donald Trump’s fascination with Greenland isn’t a new development.

During his first term as president (2017–2021), Trump notably expressed interest in acquiring the territory, highlighting its rich natural resources and strategic geopolitical importance.

In 2019, he proposed the idea of purchasing Greenland, sparking international headlines. However, the suggestion was met with strong resistance from Danish leaders.

Panama’s Foreign Minister Javier Martínez-Acha reiterated his government’s position, emphasising that the canal’s sovereignty is non-negotiable.

“The sovereignty of our canal is not negotiable and is part of our history of struggle and an irreversible conquest,” he stated.

Trump’s bid for Canada

Trump also floated the idea of Canada joining the US as its 51st state. While he ruled out military action against Canada, he suggested leveraging “economic force” to address trade imbalances, describing the US trade deficit with its northern neighbor as a subsidy.

Canadian leaders, however, pushed back firmly.

“President-elect Trump’s comments show a complete lack of understanding of what makes Canada a strong country,” Canadian Foreign Minister Mélanie Joly said.

Outgoing Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was more pointed, writing, “There isn’t a snowball’s chance in hell that Canada would become part of the United States.”

In addition, Trump proposed renaming the Gulf of Mexico as the “Gulf of America,” calling it a “beautiful” name.

He also advocated for NATO members to increase their defense spending targets to 5% of GDP, up from the current goal of 2%.

The post ‘Golden age of America’: Trump says military option on table to take Greenland, Panama Canal appeared first on Invezz

The mounting economic challenges in China are not just altering domestic investment strategies but also driving wealthy individuals to seek financial security beyond its borders, as per an Aljazeera report.

Chinese millionaires leaving homeland

Many high-net-worth Chinese individuals are transferring wealth out of the country and some are also choosing to leave the country.

In 2023, 13,800 Chinese millionaires left the nation, and the number is projected to rise to 15,200 by the end of 2024, according to Henley & Partners.

While China still boasts over 6 million millionaires, this trend underscores a growing erosion of confidence among its wealthiest citizens.

Wealth transfers have not gone unnoticed by Chinese authorities.

Stringent capital controls limit individuals to transferring $50,000 annually, with transactions above 50,000 yuan flagged for scrutiny. However, affluent individuals have employed creative methods to bypass these restrictions.

Underground money handlers and techniques like “smurfing,” which involve splitting large transactions across multiple people, facilitate the movement of funds.

In response, the Chinese government has ramped up crackdowns, dismantling over 100 underground financial operations and tracing illicit transactions worth $11 billion since mid-2023.

Top destinations for Chinese wealth

Singapore has emerged as a premier destination for wealthy Chinese seeking financial refuge. Its reputation for political stability, robust regulatory framework, and favourable tax policies make it a top choice for establishing family offices and purchasing luxury real estate.

In 2022, Chinese buyers dominated Singapore’s high-end property market, and the city-state continues to attract significant wealth inflows despite heightened scrutiny.

Other destinations like Canada and the US remain popular, though recent geopolitical tensions have added complexities to wealth migration.

Meanwhile, Singapore’s Monetary Authority has rejected some applications for family offices linked to Chinese wealth, reflecting increased vigilance against illicit financial activities.

As China’s affluent class continues to diversify their assets internationally, this trend may have far-reaching implications.

While the immediate concern for Beijing is mitigating capital flight, the broader issue lies in restoring trust among the private sector.

Recent government efforts to adopt a pro-business tone, including reassurances from Premier Li Qiang, aim to stem the outflow of wealth.

It remains to be seen whether these measures will rebuild confidence in China’s economic stability.

China’s wealthy seek global insurance

With the nation grappling with slowed growth, high youth unemployment, and a faltering property market, affluent Chinese are increasingly opting for foreign insurance policies.

These provide both a hedge against local risks and access to more robust healthcare systems, highlighting a trend with significant implications for global markets.

China’s economic growth has been underwhelming, falling well below its historical average and casting doubt on its ability to reach the desirable growth target.

This uncertainty, coupled with systemic issues like youth unemployment above 17% and a property market slump with prices down by 8% from their peak, has shaken confidence in domestic investments.

For the wealthy, securing foreign insurance policies has become a means of diversifying their assets and ensuring financial stability.

These policies, often acquired in regions like Hong Kong, Singapore, and the US, are viewed as more reliable and comprehensive compared to their domestic counterparts.

Foreign insurance plans offer the dual benefit of robust international healthcare access and financial products tied to global markets.

This shift highlights how economic challenges at home are reshaping the spending patterns of China’s affluent.

The post Many Chinese millionaires are relocating: where are they heading? appeared first on Invezz

Subscriptions to streaming services and the revival of the popularity of vinyl pushed the UK music industry’s revenues to a record high last year at almost £2.4 billion, the Entertainment Retailers Association (ERA) said.

The development has finally marked the recovery of the industry that was struggling due to the digital revolution that led to widespread piracy and the wiping out of the CD.

Streaming services such as Spotify, Amazon, and Apple accounted for the lion’s share of consumer spending, crossing the £2bn threshold for the first time.

Vinyl, experiencing its 17th consecutive year of sales growth, contributed significantly with a 10.5% rise in revenues to £196m.

“Music is back – thanks to streaming and the vinyl revival,” said Kim Bayley, the chief executive of the ERA.

For decades it was new release activity which drove most revenues. Digital services and retailers have become the drivers of the market.

However, since the figures are not adjusted for inflation, total UK spending on music is still likely to be below the level recorded in 2001.

Vinyl records continue to defy trends

Physical formats, which were once thought to be in decline, also saw a surprising uptick in sales.

Spending on CDs, vinyl, and cassettes rose by 6.2% to £330m, with vinyl records leading the charge.

While CD album revenues remained flat at £126m, vinyl’s growing appeal among younger and nostalgic audiences has kept it in high demand, with Vinyl album sales outpacing the market at 10.5% to £196m.

Notably, the year’s best-selling album was Taylor Swift’s The Tortured Poets Department, with 783,820 units sold across all formats, including streaming-equivalent albums.

Total album sales hit 201.4m, breaking records set in the early 2000s, although the figures now incorporate digital formats.

Challenges for music creators

Despite the impressive financial recovery, many musicians and industry stakeholders remain critical of how revenues are distributed.

While streaming now accounts for 85% of UK music income, artists claim they see little benefit from the surge.

“A record-breaking year for whom?” asked Tom Gray, chair of the UK songwriters’ body the Ivors Academy, and a member of the band Gomez.

“Music creators are not seeing a fair share of this success,” he said.

The Musicians’ Union echoed similar concerns. General Secretary Naomi Pohl highlighted ongoing challenges for professional artists, including high living costs, post-Brexit touring difficulties, and inadequate public arts funding.

“Sadly, professional musicians, artists, and songwriters are not enjoying the boom represented by these figures …

They are facing multiple problems including the high cost of living and touring, stagnating public arts funding, problems touring in the EU post-Brexit and, crucially, they are not receiving their fair share of streaming revenue.

Other entertainment sectors see mixed results

The ERA report also shed light on the performance of the broader entertainment market, including digital video and gaming.

Spending on digital video subscriptions grew by 6.9% to £5 billion, led by platforms such as Netflix, Disney+, and Amazon Prime Video.

These services now account for almost 90% of the video sector’s revenue.

Physical video sales, however, continued their decline, falling 7.9% to £156 million.

The most popular title of the year, Deadpool & Wolverine, sold 561,917 units, with over 80% purchased through digital channels.

Meanwhile, the gaming market experienced a slowdown, with revenues dropping 4.4% to £4.6 billion.

Despite this, EA Sports FC, formerly known as FIFA Sports, remained a best-seller, moving 2.9m units, 80% of which were digital downloads.

The post Taylor Swift dominates album sales as UK music revenue reaches record high in 2024 appeared first on Invezz

JPMorgan Chase, along with other major US banks, has made a decisive move away from the Net Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA), signaling a significant shift in Wall Street’s stance on climate-related financial alliances.

As of this week, JPMorgan’s exit from the NZBA marks the culmination of a larger trend, with firms like Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Goldman Sachs following suit.

The banks are increasingly choosing to advance their green finance agendas independently, sparking debate over the role of financial institutions in promoting climate action.

What is Net Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA)?

The Net Zero Banking Alliance, launched in 2021 as part of the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ), sought to unite banks in a collective effort to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050.

Initially, it garnered strong support, with banks touting their participation as a commitment to environmentally conscious financial practices.

However, these affiliations have come under fire from political circles, particularly with the impending shift in US leadership as Republicans prepare to take over Washington in 2025.

This political pushback, driven by concerns over “woke” investing, has prompted some of America’s largest banks to reassess their memberships in environmental initiatives.

Criticism of financial climate alliances is not new.

In December, the House Judiciary Committee, led by Republican Jim Jordan, accused these groups of forming what he described as a “climate cartel.”

This political backlash has gained traction in the wake of the 2024 elections, with figures like former President Donald Trump leading the charge against green finance groups.

Trump’s firm support for fossil fuels, including his “drill, baby, drill” rhetoric, has exacerbated divisions between US and European financial institutions on climate action.

JPMorgan’s response

JPMorgan, in particular, has expressed its intent to continue promoting low-carbon technologies and advancing energy security through independent efforts.

The bank emphasized that its decision to leave the NZBA does not signal an abandonment of its climate goals.

Instead, it will focus on pragmatic, market-based solutions that align with its business interests and shareholder priorities.

JPMorgan’s asset management division will also maintain its membership in the Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative (NZAMI), which focuses on decarbonizing various sectors of the economy.

Despite the exit of major US banks, some institutions, such as Citigroup, remain committed to the broader Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero.

Citigroup, along with Bank of America and BlackRock, was a founding member of GFANZ. However, recent adjustments to the alliance have loosened participation criteria, signaling an evolving approach to climate action.

American vs. European financial institutions

The withdrawal of these US banks has intensified the split between American and European financial institutions on climate change commitments.

While European banks, including giants like HSBC, Barclays, and Lloyds, remain steadfast members of the NZBA, American banks are increasingly choosing to distance themselves from international climate coalitions.

This divergence highlights the growing tension between the US political landscape and global efforts to combat climate change.

As the financial sector grapples with its role in environmental sustainability, the departures from the Net Zero Banking Alliance raise questions about the future of climate finance and the competing pressures facing global financial institutions.

The post Why are major banks like JPMorgan, Citi, and BofA leaving Net-Zero Banking Alliance? appeared first on Invezz

Meta, the tech giant behind Facebook, Instagram, and Threads, announced a seismic shift in its content moderation policies on Tuesday.

The company will discontinue its third-party fact-checking program, introduced in 2016 to combat misinformation, in favor of a system relying on user-generated notes to flag potentially false or misleading posts.

The new approach is modeled after Elon Musk’s Community Notes feature on X, which reflects Meta’s pivot toward fostering greater free expression.

The social media giant said it would “allow more speech by lifting restrictions on some topics that are part of mainstream discourse and focusing our enforcement on illegal and high-severity violations” and “take a more personalized approach to political content”.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg in a video announcement,

It’s time to get back to our roots around free expression.

Zuckerberg acknowledged that the current system had become overly complex, leading to “too many mistakes and too much censorship.”

What do the changes entail?

Zuckerberg added that Meta would also change its systems to “dramatically reduce” the amount of content that its automated filters remove from its platforms.

That includes lifting restrictions on topics such as immigration and gender, to focus its systems on “illegal and high-severity violations”, such as terrorism, child exploitation, and fraud, as well as content related to suicide, self-injury and eating disorders.

Though he conceded that the shift could result in an uptick in harmful content on the platform, he said it will help the cause of those whose posts and accounts were accidentally taken down.

“The reality is that this is a trade-off,” he explained.

We’re going to catch less bad stuff, but we’ll also reduce the number of innocent people’s posts and accounts that we accidentally take down.

The rollout of this system is expected to begin in the United States within the next few months, with plans for broader implementation if successful.

Meta’s shares were down by 1.47% at 1:54 pm.

Joel Kaplan, and Trump ally Dana White at Meta

Meta’s decision appears to align with the incoming Trump administration and shows a recalibration of the company’s policies to suit the political landscape.

The announcement came just a day after UFC founder and Trump ally Dana White was appointed to Meta’s board of directors.

White joins Marc Andreessen, a tech investor and staunch advocate for reduced content moderation, in shaping Meta’s governance strategy.

The timing of these announcements, coupled with the policy reversal, shows how arduously Meta is trying to reposition itself as a proponent of free speech under the Trump presidency.

Joel Kaplan, Meta’s newly appointed global policy chief, who has played a significant role in Tuesday’s announcement, described the shift as a necessary reset.

“This is a great opportunity for us to reset the balance in favor of free expression,” Kaplan said in an interview on Fox and Friends.

Kaplan said the company’s previous fact-checking system became too “biased” and the company wanted to return to its roots of more unfettered speech.

He pointed to Elon Musk’s X, which has few rules and allows users to moderate each other, as a good model, adding,

I think Elon’s played an incredibly important role in moving the debate and getting people refocused on free expression.

Content moderation staff to relocate to Texas

As part of the overhaul, Meta plans to move its US-based content moderation teams from California to Texas.

Zuckerberg stated that the relocation aims to rebuild trust and address concerns over bias within the moderation process.

Texas, known for its conservative values, is seen as a strategic choice.

However, critics argue that the move could polarize public opinion further by aligning Meta’s operations more closely with conservative ideologies.

Safety advocates raise alarms over increased risks

The changes have sparked a backlash from safety advocates who warn of potentially dire consequences, especially for vulnerable users.

Ian Russell, a prominent campaigner for online safety whose daughter Molly took her life after viewing harmful content on Instagram, expressed his dismay.

These moves could have dire consequences for many children and young adults.

Meta’s decision to abandon partnerships with news organizations and third-party fact-checkers has also raised concerns among digital safety experts.

Many fear that misinformation will spread more rapidly without the rigorous checks previously in place.

Criticism has also come from governments and media organizations worldwide.

Zuckerberg aimed European laws, which he claimed are “institutionalizing censorship,” as well as restrictive regimes in China and Latin America.

He framed the decision as part of a broader effort to push back against global regulations that hinder innovation and free expression.

Meta’s policy echoes Elon Musk’s X

The overhaul mirrors Elon Musk’s strategy with X, formerly Twitter, where user-generated moderation through Community Notes has become a cornerstone of the platform’s approach to misinformation.

Musk, a major Trump donor, has increasingly positioned X as a platform for unfettered free speech, often sparking controversy.

Zuckerberg’s decision to emulate this model signals a broader trend among tech giants to shift away from centralized moderation in favour of community-driven systems.

While this may reduce operational complexities, critics warn that it places too much responsibility on users to police misinformation.

On a broader level, since Trump’s victory in November, some major corporations have been seen aligning overtly with the president-elect.

During the presidential transition, Meta has made a series of announcements reflecting what CEO Mark Zuckerberg described as a “cultural tipping point” brought about by the election.

Trump was asked about Meta’s announcement at an unrelated news conference he was hosting at Mar-a-Lago.

Trump said he watched Joel Kaplan’s interview on Fox and found it “impressive,” adding that the company had “come a long way.”

A beat later, though, Trump conceded that the change was “probably” due to threats that he has made against the company and its leader, Mark Zuckerberg.

The post Meta ends fact-checking efforts as it aligns with incoming Trump administration appeared first on Invezz

President-elect Donald Trump on Tuesday announced a $20 billion investment in US-based data centers by Hussain Sajwani, the billionaire founder of DAMAC Properties and a close business associate of the Trump family.

The investment is aimed at supporting advancements in artificial intelligence, cryptocurrency, and other sectors driving the digital economy.

Trump announced at a press conference, emphasizing his ability to attract substantial investments into the United States.

“Sajwani was inspired by the election results and made this commitment because of it,” Trump stated, adding that his administration would streamline regulatory approvals for large-scale investments.

Hussain Sajwani’s expanding global portfolio

DAMAC Properties, a leading private developer in the UAE, is known for its luxury real estate projects, including the Trump International Golf Club in Dubai.

Sajwani’s $20 billion commitment marks his company’s first venture into US-based data centers, a sector projected to see $1 trillion in domestic investment over the next five years.

The planned data centers will complement DAMAC’s existing EDGNEX portfolio, which includes facilities in the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Spain.

This investment highlights Sajwani’s strategic shift toward digital infrastructure, which plays a crucial role in AI, blockchain, and cloud computing.

Trump-Sajwani relationship under the spotlight

Sajwani’s close ties with Trump have fueled speculation about the role of personal relationships in securing such large-scale deals.

The two have collaborated on numerous projects, including the Trump-branded golf club in Dubai and discussions of a Trump Tower in the UAE.

Although plans for a $2 billion partnership between DAMAC and the Trump Organization after Trump’s first electoral victory did not materialize, Sajwani has publicly credited Trump’s presidency for raising his company’s global profile.

A boost for AI, crypto, and US digital infrastructure

The new data centers will support emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and cryptocurrency, which require significant processing power.

These facilities are expected to bolster the US’s position as a global leader in digital innovation.

Sajwani, who joined Trump at the press conference, said, “Trump’s vision for the US economy aligns with my company’s expansion goals.

This partnership represents a significant milestone for DAMAC Properties and our entry into the U.S. technology sector.”

The announcement comes amid DAMAC’s broader global ambitions.

Recent ventures include a Trump-branded golf course in Oman and potential developments in Saudi Arabia.

A Trump Tower in Dubai is also under consideration, signaling continued collaboration between the Trump Organization and DAMAC.

The post Trump announces $20B investment by Emirati billionaire Hussain Sajwani, boosting AI and crypto growth appeared first on Invezz

President-elect Donald Trump sparked global controversy on Tuesday by stating that he would not rule out the use of military force to gain control of the Panama Canal and Greenland, deeming both territories vital to US national security.

Trump’s vision for a “golden age of America”

Addressing reporters, Trump underscored the strategic importance of both regions, saying, “The Panama Canal is vital to our country,” and adding, “We need Greenland for national security purposes.”

Asked whether he would commit to peaceful means, Trump declined to rule out military options, stating, “It might be that you’ll have to do something.”

Greenland, an autonomous territory of Denmark and home to a major U.S. military base, has long been a focus of Arctic geopolitics.

Trump cast doubts on Denmark’s sovereignty over Greenland, suggesting its acquisition would bolster US security.

Meanwhile, the Panama Canal, under Panamanian control since 1999, remains a critical waterway for global commerce.

Trump characterised his vision as part of a broader effort to usher in a “golden age of America.”

His comments, however, have sparked unease among allies and raised questions about the potential implications for U.S. foreign policy under his administration.

US allies not impressed by Trump’s ideas

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen reaffirmed her country’s strong alliance with the United States but dismissed any notion of U.S. annexation.

“The United States is Denmark’s most important and closest ally, but any interest in Greenland must be respectful of the Greenlandic people,” Frederiksen said in an interview.

She stressed that Denmark and the US must maintain cooperation within NATO.

Greenland’s government issued a statement clarifying that Donald Trump Jr, who recently landed in Nuuk, was visiting as a private individual, and there would be no official meetings.

Donald Trump’s fascination with Greenland isn’t a new development.

During his first term as president (2017–2021), Trump notably expressed interest in acquiring the territory, highlighting its rich natural resources and strategic geopolitical importance.

In 2019, he proposed the idea of purchasing Greenland, sparking international headlines. However, the suggestion was met with strong resistance from Danish leaders.

Panama’s Foreign Minister Javier Martínez-Acha reiterated his government’s position, emphasising that the canal’s sovereignty is non-negotiable.

“The sovereignty of our canal is not negotiable and is part of our history of struggle and an irreversible conquest,” he stated.

Trump’s bid for Canada

Trump also floated the idea of Canada joining the US as its 51st state. While he ruled out military action against Canada, he suggested leveraging “economic force” to address trade imbalances, describing the US trade deficit with its northern neighbor as a subsidy.

Canadian leaders, however, pushed back firmly.

“President-elect Trump’s comments show a complete lack of understanding of what makes Canada a strong country,” Canadian Foreign Minister Mélanie Joly said.

Outgoing Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was more pointed, writing, “There isn’t a snowball’s chance in hell that Canada would become part of the United States.”

In addition, Trump proposed renaming the Gulf of Mexico as the “Gulf of America,” calling it a “beautiful” name.

He also advocated for NATO members to increase their defense spending targets to 5% of GDP, up from the current goal of 2%.

The post ‘Golden age of America’: Trump says military option on table to take Greenland, Panama Canal appeared first on Invezz