Kering, the parent company of Gucci, has appointed Stefano Cantino as the new CEO of its flagship brand at a time when both Gucci and the broader luxury sector are facing significant challenges.

Cantino, who will officially take the reins in early 2024, steps into this role amid a backdrop of declining sales, particularly in China, and growing pressure to revitalize the struggling brand.

With a global economic slowdown hitting luxury demand, his task of turning Gucci around will be no small feat.

Gucci’s declining performance has dragged Kering’s stock, with shares down by 4.5% on Tuesday, further impacted by a broader pullback in luxury stocks like LVMH and Burberry.

Gucci, in particular, has been the main driver of Kering’s downturn, with the brand’s struggles leading to a 43% stock price drop over the past year.

Analysts sound the alarm on Gucci’s struggles

Analysts have raised concerns about Gucci’s future, with Jefferies recently downgrading Kering’s price target, citing the tough luxury demand environment.

Kering’s stock has been hit hard, with Jefferies noting that the third-quarter sales update is likely to highlight ongoing difficulties, particularly in China, where Gucci has underperformed compared to its rivals.

Both Barclays and RBC Capital have also downgraded Kering’s stock.

Barclays lowered its rating to “Underweight” and slashed its price target from €276 to €210, citing worsening sales in China.

The market’s lukewarm reception to Gucci’s recent product offerings has added to concerns about the brand’s turnaround potential.

Global slowdown weighs heavily on Gucci

The luxury sector, which experienced explosive growth in recent years, is now grappling with a global slowdown.

Rising inflation and reduced consumer spending, coupled with economic headwinds in key markets like China, have put significant pressure on brands like Gucci.

While Gucci previously thrived by attracting a younger and less affluent clientele, it now faces the challenge of appealing to higher-spending, more conservative consumers.

China, a critical market for luxury brands, has been a major source of concern.

Kering reported a revenue and profit decline for the first half of 2024, driven largely by slowing demand in China.

Despite China’s economic stimulus measures, analysts remain skeptical that it will provide immediate relief to the luxury sector.

Gucci’s turnaround: a tall order for Stefano Cantino

Stefano Cantino’s appointment comes after a broader management reshuffle at Gucci, including the hiring of Sabato de Sarno as the brand’s new creative director.

While de Sarno aims to revitalize Gucci’s designs and target a more affluent customer base, analysts worry that the brand’s reliance on seasonal trends may no longer be sustainable.

Gucci’s once-trendsetting approach now needs to shift toward a more timeless, conservative aesthetic to win back higher-spending consumers.

One of Cantino’s key tasks will be addressing Gucci’s underperformance in China, where it has struggled to keep pace with competitors like Louis Vuitton and Hermès.

Barclays recently raised concerns over Gucci’s steeper sales decline in China compared to its peers, casting doubt on the brand’s recovery in this crucial market.

As Cantino steps into his new role, all eyes will be on how he navigates these challenges.

While there’s hope that his leadership could restore Gucci’s former glory, the road to recovery will be anything but smooth for the luxury giant.

The post Gucci’s new CEO Stefano Cantino faces tough road ahead amid global luxury slowdown appeared first on Invezz

The Nifty 50 index rose for the second consecutive day after the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) delivered its interest rate decision. It soared to a high of ₹25,180 on Wednesday, a few points above this month’s low of ₹24,695.

RBI interest rate decision

The biggest catalyst for the Nifty 50 index and the BSE Sensex was the decision by the RBI to go against the grain.

It left interest rates unchanged at 6.50% for the tenth consecutive time. Before that, the bank hiked rates from 4.0% in 2022 in a bid to fight the elevated inflation rate.

Recently, however, the country’s inflation has continued falling, moving from 7.45% to 3.6%. The key challenge, however, is that food inflation has remained at an elevated level for a while. 

On the positive side, there are signs that the RBI will start cutting interest rates in the coming meetings. In his statement, Governor Shaktikanta Das sounded optimistic that the country’s food and energy inflation will start moderating in the coming months. In a statement, a Standard Charted analyst said:

“The surprise decision to change the stance to neutral underlines growing confidence in achieving the inflation targets. It’s likely to raise expectations of rate cut in December though the headline CPI prints will remain the key determinant of the first rate cut timing.”

The RBI’s shift to a dovish tone happened as most central banks cut interest rates. In neighboring China, the central bank has brought rates to the highest level in years and implemented a series of measures to stimulate the economy.

In the United States, the Federal Reserve has slashed interest rates by 0.50%, and officials have hinted that more of these cuts were coming. The bank is expected to deliver 0.25% cuts in the next two meetings.

In Europe, the European Central Bank (ECB) has slashed rates by 0.50% this year as the economic weakness continues. European inflation has now moved to the 2% target and industrial and manufacturing production has moderated. 

Other top central banks like those in Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and Indonesia have also slashed rates. 

Therefore, the Nifty 50 index will likely benefit from low interest rates by pushing investors from bonds to equities.

Top Nifty 50 stocks in 2024

Most companies in the Nifty 50 and BSE Sensex indices have done well this year as many Indians have started to invest in the local market.

Mahindra & Mahindra, a leading company in the automotive and farm equipment industry, has been the best-performing company in the Nifty 50 index this year as it jumped by over 83%. 

Other Indian automakers like Tata Motors and Maruti Suzuki have done well, soaring by more than 30% this year. This performance is mostly because of the strong order flow from Indian customers as the economy continues doing well.

Indian automakers have done better than their western peers like Stellantis, Ford Motor, and General Motors, which have all dropped this year. These western brands have struggled because of their flawed movement into electric vehicle industry.

Indian companies like Bajaj Auto, Eicher Motors, and Hero Motorcorp have also done well this year, rising by over 40%. 

The other top companies in the Nifty 50 index in 2024 are Adani Ports, Shriram Finance, Sun Pharmaceuticals, Tech Mahindra, and SBI Life Insurance. 

A key concern among invesrors is that the Nifty 50 index has become severely overvalued. For one, data shows that the Nifty 50 index has a price-to-earnings ratio of 23, higher than other global indices. For example, the S&P 500 index has a multiple of 21 while the German DAX has a multiple of 15. 

Therefore, Nifty index constituents will need to continue reporting strong financial results to justify the hefty valuation. 

The next key catalyst for the Nifty 50 index will be the upcoming US inflation and Federal Reserve minutes. These events will provide more color about the next action by the Fed.

Nifty 50 index analysis

Nifty index chart | Source: TradingView

The weekly chart shows that the Nifty 50 index has been in a strong bull run in the past few years. It has rallied from the 2020 low of ₹7,452 to a record high of ₹26,305, a 254% increase. 

The index has remained above the 50-week and 100-week Exponential Moving Averages (EMA), meaning that bulls are in control.

However, there are some potential risks. For one, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) has moved from the overbought point of 77 to 61. The two lines of the MACD indicator have formed a bearish crossover pattern.

Also, the index has formed a rising broadening wedge, pointing to more downside in the coming weeks. If this happens, the next point to watch will be at ₹23,500. A move above the year-to-day high of ₹26,305 will invalidate the bearish view.

The post Nifty 50 index rises after RBI decision: top gainers in 2024 revealed appeared first on Invezz

The enigma of Bitcoin’s creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, has baffled the world for years.

With billions of dollars and the future of digital finance potentially tied to this anonymous figure, any attempt to unmask Nakamoto is met with intrigue and skepticism.

HBO’s latest documentary, ‘Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery’, aims to do just that—though not without backlash.

In the film, director Cullen Hoback presents Peter Todd, a Bitcoin core developer, as the person behind the creation of Bitcoin in 2009.

But Todd has firmly rejected this claim.

“For the record, I’m not Satoshi,” Todd declared in a statement to CNN.

He further criticized the film for being “irresponsible” and endangering his life by placing him at the center of such speculation.

“Cullen is grasping for straws here,” Todd stated, revealing that he was neither contacted nor given a chance to review the documentary prior to its release.

He’s amplifying coincidences into a larger conspiracy.

HBO, part of Warner Bros. Discovery like CNN, has yet to respond to these allegations.

Nevertheless, Hoback defended his work, telling CNN he was not surprised by Todd’s denial, and that he stood by the documentary’s conclusions.

“Peter was there when we interviewed him,” Hoback explained.

He had every chance to clarify things. I remain confident in the evidence we present.

The mystery of Satoshi Nakamoto deepens

The speculation surrounding the true identity of Satoshi Nakamoto has sparked countless theories over the years.

Who is the person, or group, that developed Bitcoin and vanished from the digital landscape in 2013? As Bitcoin’s value surged, so did interest in the figure who allegedly controls an estimated one million Bitcoin—worth billions of dollars.

Hoback spent years following various leads, eventually zeroing in on Todd.

He cites a 2010 Bitcoin forum post from Todd as potential evidence linking him to Nakamoto.

This isn’t the first time Hoback has sought to solve an online mystery.

He previously gained attention for his work on HBO’s ‘Q: Into The Storm’, where he examined the origins of the QAnon conspiracy.

In this case, however, Hoback believes the evidence points toward Todd, and the film’s climactic moments involve Todd’s reaction when confronted with these claims.

The importance of Nakamoto’s identity

Why does uncovering Nakamoto’s identity even matter? Hoback offers a compelling argument.

“If Bitcoin had faded into obscurity, it wouldn’t be such a big deal. But Bitcoin is becoming a critical part of the global financial system. It’s being embraced by countries, integrated into retirement plans, and it’s not going anywhere,” he told CNN.

There’s this anonymous figure who could hold a massive share of it. That’s a lot of power for someone we know nothing about.

Hoback argues that Nakamoto’s anonymity once served Bitcoin’s mythos, allowing people to view the cryptocurrency as a near-divine gift to humanity. But now, that very anonymity may be a liability, especially given Bitcoin’s growing influence.

Why did Todd agree to the interview?

One of the film’s key moments is Hoback’s interview with Todd, who agreed to be part of the documentary despite the implications.

Why would someone who is allegedly Nakamoto voluntarily step into the spotlight?

Hoback speculates that individuals who have had such a profound impact on the world might harbor conflicting emotions.

Imagine you’ve held this secret for years. Wouldn’t there be a part of you that wants credit? And maybe you think appearing on camera would actually help your cover.

Todd, Hoback explains, has a known interest in game theory and alternate identities, adding a layer of complexity to his involvement in the documentary.

The Climactic Confrontation

The film’s tension culminates in Hoback’s direct confrontation with Todd.

Their paths first crossed years earlier at a Bitcoin conference, but it wasn’t until much later that Hoback began to seriously consider Todd as Nakamoto.

Todd’s cryptic behavior and his connections within the Bitcoin community led Hoback to explore the theory further.

While Todd himself has implicated others, including Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back, Hoback finds the entire interaction revealing.

“In some ways, the reaction says more than the evidence itself,” he said of the film’s finale.

Legal concerns addressed

Despite Todd’s denials, HBO had no qualms about airing the documentary. Hoback assured CNN that the film went through rigorous fact-checking, and Todd was given ample opportunity to present his side.Everything in the film is factual. You see the reactions unfold in real-time,” Hoback emphasized.

There were no concerns because the case we present is based on evidence.

Though Todd has rejected the documentary’s claims, Hoback is unphased.

“He’s had plenty of time to prepare for this. His reaction doesn’t surprise me,” the director concluded.

Ultimately, whether Peter Todd is Nakamoto or not, Money Electric reignites the debate around Bitcoin’s elusive creator, ensuring that the mystery—and the speculation—will continue.

The post The real identify of Satoshi Nakamoto: HBO doc claims to reveal Bitcoin’s creator, subject denies it appeared first on Invezz

The US Justice Department is weighing unprecedented action against Google as it contemplates a potential breakup of the tech giant to address concerns over its dominance in the online search market.

In a significant antitrust case, the agency is exploring structural remedies, including the possibility of forcing Google to sell off parts of its business, a move that would echo the most significant antitrust breakup since the government’s failed attempt to split Microsoft two decades ago.

In a court filing submitted Tuesday, federal antitrust officials indicated that US District Judge Amit Mehta may be presented with several options to mitigate the harm caused by Google’s monopolistic practices.

These remedies include requiring Google to grant greater access to the data it uses to generate search results and develop its artificial intelligence (AI) products.

“The Justice Department is considering behavioral and structural remedies that would prevent Google from using products such as Chrome, Play, and Android to advantage Google search,” the filing stated, highlighting how the tech giant could be prohibited from leveraging its other platforms to stifle competition in emerging markets, including AI.

Potential remedies for Google’s dominance

The 32-page document, which outlines the potential remedies, suggests that further details will be presented in the coming month as the case enters its next phase.

Among the proposals, regulators are considering giving advertisers more control over their campaigns, with specific focus on Google’s dominance in search text ads.

The department is also considering a requirement that Google give websites more flexibility in opting out of its AI products.

Furthermore, the Justice Department hinted it might seek to block Google from investing in, or acquiring, potential competitors in the search space, a move aimed at preventing the tech giant from neutralizing threats through financial dominance.

In response to the filing, futures for the Nasdaq 100, which includes Google’s parent company Alphabet Inc. among its top holdings, dipped slightly, reflecting the market’s sensitivity to the potential ramifications of such a historic move.

Google pushes back, calling filing “radical”

Google quickly hit back at the Justice Department’s proposal, characterizing the recommendations as extreme.

Lee-Anne Mulholland, Google’s vice president of regulatory affairs, expressed concern in a blog post:

We believe that today’s blueprint goes well beyond the legal scope of the Court’s decision about Search distribution contracts.

The company argued that implementing these remedies would lead to unintended consequences for both consumers and businesses, while also undermining US competitiveness on a global stage.

Google’s defense highlights its insistence that the proposed remedies, if implemented, would disrupt its core business, potentially harming users and advertisers alike.

A historic move in antitrust law

This case represents the most aggressive action against a major technology company over illegal monopolization in decades.

At the core of the Justice Department’s argument is that Google has unfairly leveraged its agreements with other companies to make its search engine the default choice on smartphones and web browsers, consolidating its power in the digital ecosystem.

The Android operating system, used in millions of smartphones worldwide, is also a key factor in Google’s dominance, enabling the company to promote its search engine through pre-installed apps and services.

Regulators argue that Google has benefited from its market dominance through these practices, leading to an unfair advantage over rivals.

The Justice Department is also exploring measures related to Google’s artificial intelligence products, aiming to address concerns over its extensive control in emerging AI markets.

Additionally, Google’s powerful search text ad business is under scrutiny, with regulators seeking to impose more transparency and control for advertisers over where their ads are displayed.

Legal Battle Far from Over

Judge Amit Mehta, who ruled earlier this year that Google violated antitrust laws in both its search and search advertising markets, is expected to hold a trial next spring to determine what remedies, if any, will be imposed. A final decision is anticipated by August 2025.

Google, which plans to appeal Mehta’s initial ruling, must wait for the court to finalize its remedy before moving forward with its appeal. The company’s legal battles extend beyond this case, as Google is also facing separate antitrust lawsuits involving its dominance in online display advertising and its app distribution practices on Android smartphones.

Antitrust pressures against the tech giant are mounting. Just this week, a separate federal judge ruled that Google must open up its app store for three years to address antitrust concerns raised by Epic Games Inc. The company has announced plans to appeal that decision as well.

Uncertain future for Google

Despite the significant legal challenges, some experts are skeptical about whether a breakup of Google is truly imminent.

Daniel Ives, managing director and senior equity analyst at Wedbush Securities, voiced doubts about the likelihood of a forced divestiture.

“We believe a breakup of Google is unlikely at this point despite the antitrust swirls,” he said.

Google will battle this in the courts for years.

Adding to the complexity, a coalition of states involved in a separate lawsuit against Google has suggested the company might be required to fund a public campaign educating users on how to switch search engines, should they wish to move away from Google’s dominant platform.

With several antitrust cases moving through the courts simultaneously, Google faces a long and uncertain legal battle.

What’s clear is that the Justice Department is determined to curtail the tech giant’s influence over the online search market—potentially reshaping the future of digital search as we know it.

The post US mulls Google breakup in landmark antitrust case over search monopoly appeared first on Invezz