Author

admin

Browsing

India’s startup ecosystem, home to over 100 unicorn companies, continues to thrive despite challenges. Between 2014 and mid-2024, it attracted over $150 billion in investments, making it the third-largest in the world.

Key sectors such as e-commerce, fintech, and enterprise tech accounted for 52% of the total funding, according to Inc42.

Unicorn India Ventures (UIV), a tech-focused early-stage venture fund, has been instrumental in this growth since its inception in 2016.

From a ₹100 crore first fund in 2016, which invested in companies like Open Bank (valued at over $1 billion in 2022) with an impressive 60% annualized IRR, to a ₹1,000 crore third fund in 2023 aimed at global SaaS, deep tech, and IP-driven startups, UIV has closely witnessed India’s evolving startup landscape.

Focusing on tier-2 and tier-3 cities, UIV positions itself uniquely in India’s venture capital scene.

Additionally, the firm is exploring cross-border opportunities, particularly between Indian startups and US companies.

In an interview with Invezz, Bhaskar Majumdar, founder and managing partner of UIV, discussed the firm’s deep-tech investment strategy, emerging India-US startup synergies, UIV’s UK plans, and the challenges of investing in Indian media startups.

Edited excerpts:

Invezz: What motivates UIV to invest in deep-tech?

Deep-tech is seeing strong government support. The PLI (Production-Linked Incentive) scheme has been successful in the semiconductor industry, and a similar Design-Linked Incentive (DLI) scheme is now underway.

Globally, the “China Plus One” strategy has also benefited Indian companies.

From our perspective, we believe India’s future will be built on companies in manufacturing with strong global patents.

Within our portfolio, we’ve noticed such companies don’t necessarily need full revenue cycles or traditional growth metrics.

If their patents are robust, they often get acquired early in their lifecycle.

India is set to emerge as a global player in this space, and these are the investments we’re focused on.

‘Our aim is to invest in both Indian and US startups’

Invezz: What are UIV’s plans for becoming a cross-border fund?

It’s early days for our cross-border ambitions. A few years ago, we launched a sidecar fund to invest in UK tech businesses with scale-up opportunities in India.

However, the fund didn’t scale as expected due to COVID-19 and limitations within the UK tech ecosystem.

Today, we’re observing strong integration between Indian startups and US companies.

Many Indian startups are generating 70-80% of their revenue from the US within just a few years of operation.

Additionally, global tech giants like Amazon and Google are scaling Indian startups as go-to-market partners.

Similarly, some US-headquartered space-tech and R&D-focused companies are establishing development centers in India.

The India-US integration resembles the US-Israel collaboration, creating a unified ecosystem.

Our aim is to invest in both Indian and US startups, with or without an India connection.

However, our immediate focus remains on closing our third fund.

‘Unlike Europe’s aggressive anti-fossil fuel stance, the US could model coexistence’

Invezz: What do you expect from the new US administration under Trump as a VC?

Trump’s presidency could benefit emerging technologies like crypto and Web3, sectors that have faced start-stop growth cycles.

Many in the crypto space are optimistic about his policies.

Additionally, with figures like Elon Musk at the forefront, we anticipate a balanced approach toward renewable energy and fossil fuels.

Unlike Europe’s aggressive anti-fossil fuel stance, the US could model coexistence.

This approach may influence emerging markets like India, where forced EV transitions sometimes feel unnatural. Market dynamics should guide these shifts.

‘Globally, there’s significant interest in India’s private markets’

Invezz: Are family offices and UHNWIs more interested in startups today? 

When we raised our first fund in 2016-17, the concept of startup investment was not well understood in India.

Investors were familiar with mutual funds and PMS products but not startups.

In the last 7-8 years, that has changed.

Family offices and ultra-high-net-worth individuals (UHNWIs) now allocate 10-15% of their portfolios to private markets, including early-stage startups.

These investors increasingly rely on professional fund managers to deploy their capital.

Globally, there’s significant interest in India’s private markets.

Liquidity from IPOs and exits has also fueled optimism, making the Indian startup ecosystem ripe for growth.

‘Of the eight UK investments we made, seven are performing well’

Invezz: Why did UIV’s UK fund not succeed as planned?

The UK has limited large-scale funds and low entrepreneurial activity.

While tax incentive schemes for startup investments were introduced, they seem counterintuitive.

Risk capital should be about growth potential, not tax savings.

Family offices and UHNWIs in the UK allocate limited resources to startups.

Consequently, we decided to focus on India.

Of the eight UK investments we made, seven are performing well, but this isn’t our core strategy.

‘Returns for VCs in media-tech have been limited’

Invezz: Why does UIV avoid investing in Indian media startups?

Despite my background in media, it’s a challenging space for VCs.

The content market is winner-takes-all—20 players may fail for one to succeed, like The Economic Times.

Media as an industry tends to be cash-neutral, and returns for VCs in media-tech have been limited.

Additionally, entrenched players like Meta and Google dominate, leaving little room for new entrants.

We’ve made selective investments, such as Inc42, a strategic startup within the ecosystem, but broadly, we stay away from media startups.

The post Interview: Indian startups and US firms forge deeper ties, mirroring US-Israel business integration, says UIV’s Bhaskar Majumdar appeared first on Invezz

President-elect Donald Trump’s pledge to impose sweeping tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico, and China has reignited global trade tensions.

His proposed measures, which include a 25% tariff on Canadian and Mexican goods and an additional 10% tariff on Chinese imports, signal a drastic shift in US trade policy that could reshape global supply chains, stoke inflation, and potentially violate existing trade agreements.

Trump’s tariff proposals

Trump’s proposed 25% tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico hinges on addressing two issues: stemming the flow of fentanyl and curbing illegal migration.

These measures directly challenge the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which promotes largely duty-free trade between the three nations.

Signed into law during Trump’s first term, the agreement was touted as a landmark achievement in fostering North American economic cooperation.

On China, Trump accused Beijing of insufficient action to curb illicit drug precursors fueling the US opioid crisis.

He vowed an additional 10% tariff on all Chinese imports, emphasizing his intent to penalize countries perceived as undermining US economic interests.

This follows earlier threats of tariffs exceeding 60% on Chinese goods, a reflection of Trump’s consistent stance on reducing trade dependency on China.

What it means for US trade partners

These tariffs could have significant ramifications for the US’s top trading partners:

Canada and Mexico

The U.S. is the primary export destination for both nations, with 83% of Mexican and 75% of Canadian exports heading south.

Trump’s tariff plan threatens key sectors like automotive and electronics manufacturing, which rely on Mexico as a low-cost production base.

Economists warn these measures could escalate inflation and disrupt supply chains, with retaliation from Canada and Mexico adding to the uncertainty.

China

The Chinese economy is already grappling with a property downturn and weak domestic demand.

Additional tariffs could exacerbate these challenges, further straining US-China trade relations.

Source: Reuters

While Trump has criticized China’s role in the fentanyl crisis, Beijing has pushed back, citing efforts to restrict the export of drug precursors.

Chinese officials argue that the proposed tariffs risk mutual economic harm.

    Trade wars or negotiation strategy?

    Analysts suggest Trump’s tariff threats may be a high-stakes bargaining tactic to force renegotiation of the USMCA and pressure China into concessions.

    The USMCA’s six-year review provision, due in 2026, provides a formal framework for revisiting the agreement.

    By preempting this timeline, Trump appears to be leveraging tariffs as a tool for achieving broader economic objectives.

    William Reinsch, a former National Foreign Trade Council president, views these proposals as part of Trump’s broader strategy to assert dominance in trade negotiations.

    However, critics warn of unintended consequences, including potential retaliation from trading partners and harm to US consumers and businesses.

    US dollar strengthens against Canadian dollar and Mexican peso

    Trump’s announcement has already sent ripples through financial markets.

    The dollar strengthened, gaining 1% against the Canadian dollar and 2% against the Mexican peso, while Asian and European equity futures tumbled.

    Economists caution that these tariffs could revive 1930s-era protectionism, raising costs for U.S. consumers and complicating supply chain dynamics.

    President-elect Trump’s proposed tariffs underscore his “America First” economic agenda, but they also carry significant risks.

    While they may offer leverage in renegotiating trade agreements and addressing domestic issues, they risk sparking trade wars and disrupting the global economy.

    As Trump prepares to take office in January 2025, his tariff plans will undoubtedly remain a focal point of economic and political debate.

    The post Trump’s proposed tariff plans: a bold move toward trade wars or a negotiation tactic? appeared first on Invezz

    California Governor Gavin Newsom has unveiled a controversial plan to provide state rebates to electric vehicle (EV) buyers, effectively excluding Tesla Inc. from the program.

    The decision pits Newsom, a potential Democratic presidential contender, against Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a prominent Republican ally and key figure in President-elect Donald Trump’s transition team.

    Newsom’s initiative, announced Monday, seeks to reboot a rebate program that California phased out in 2023 if Trump repeals the federal $7,500 EV tax credit.

    But Newsom’s proposal would also “include changes to promote innovation and competition in the ZEV market,” a line that suggests the state would try to limit the credits to smaller market shares than Tesla.

    “It’s about creating the market conditions for more of these car makers to take root,” Newsom’s office told Bloomberg News, adding that the details are subject to legislative negotiations.

    Musk reacted to the news on X.

    “Even though Tesla is the only company who manufactures their EVs in California! This is insane,” he said.

    Tesla’s stock fell 2.9% in New York trading following the news.

    Exclusion of Tesla stirs political and market tensions

    The exclusion of Tesla from the proposed rebates signals a deeper political rift between Newsom and Musk.

    Tesla’s dominance in the California EV market has waned, with its share of EV registrations dropping to 54.5% during the first three quarters of 2024, down from 63% in the same period the previous year.

    In the Bloomberg report, Gene Munster, managing partner of Deepwater Asset Management, criticized the proposal, stating, “This is a slap in Tesla’s face.”

    Musk’s relationship with California has been fraught with conflict.

    In 2021, Tesla moved its headquarters to Texas, citing frustration with California’s regulatory environment.

    The decision followed disputes over COVID-19 lockdowns, which Musk derided as “fascist.”

    Despite these tensions, California remains Tesla’s largest domestic market, with the company accounting for more than half of all EVs sold in the state.

    EV policy at the crossroads under Trump

    Newsom’s rebate plan also underscores California’s broader struggle to shield its progressive climate policies from Trump’s deregulatory agenda.

    Trump has vowed to roll back federal EV subsidies and fuel-efficiency standards, calling them an “EV mandate.”

    During his first term, Trump targeted California’s ability to set tougher emissions standards under the Clean Air Act, and his incoming administration is expected to renew those efforts.

    California and several other states, including Oregon and Colorado, currently set their own vehicle emissions standards, which more than a dozen states follow.

    By excluding Tesla, Newsom appears to be signaling his intention to foster competition among EV manufacturers, even as he positions himself as a climate leader willing to confront Musk, a Trump ally.

    ‘Animal spirits’, not fundamentals driving Tesla’s gains: UBS

    Analysts at UBS Group AG have cautioned investors that Tesla’s recent stock rally was driven more by market sentiment than by improvements in its fundamentals.

    The company has added more than $350 billion in market capitalization since election day.

    “The rise in Tesla stock is mostly driven by animal spirits/momentum,” Joseph Spak, an analyst at UBS, wrote in a report.

    “Removing consumer tax credits for electric-vehicle purchases could force Tesla to have to cut prices,” Spak added.

    Investors anticipate that the Trump-Musk alliance could benefit Tesla, potentially introducing a national standard for self-driving cars, which would simplify the launch of autonomous taxi services.

    Spak however noted that while Trump’s policies may favor AI and autonomous vehicle ventures, Tesla lacks a ready-to-market robotaxi to benefit from these regulatory changes.

    He maintained a sell rating on the shares while raising his price target to $226 from $197.

    The post Tesla excluded from California’s proposed EV buyer incentive program, stock drops: ‘This is insane’ appeared first on Invezz

    The UK government’s recent budget announcement has sent ripples across the business community, with Chancellor Rachel Reeves revealing a £40 billion tax hike aimed at stabilizing public finances.

    Key measures include significant increases in employers’ national insurance contributions and the minimum wage, leaving firms grappling with how to absorb these costs.

    This comes at a critical time when the UK economy is already contending with stagnant growth and fierce global competition.

    Many business leaders warn that the new policies risk undermining investment and job creation, raising concerns about the broader economic implications.

    Business leaders fear tax hikes will stunt UK growth

    The Confederation of British Industry (CBI), the UK’s leading business lobby group, has voiced strong concerns over the tax increases.

    CEO Rain Newton-Smith stated that the measures have forced businesses into “damage control” mode, hindering their ability to plan for growth.

    In a survey conducted by the CBI, nearly half of the 266 respondent firms revealed plans to cut jobs, while 65% indicated a freeze on hiring.

    The sentiment among executives reflects growing unease, with many considering relocating operations to countries with more business-friendly tax regimes.

    Retailers warn of inflationary risks from rising wages

    The budget’s increase in the minimum wage has added another layer of strain for UK businesses, particularly retailers.

    Sainsbury’s CEO Simon Roberts cautioned that higher employer costs could reverse recent progress in stabilizing inflation.

    This sentiment is echoed across the retail sector, where rising operational costs are expected to squeeze already thin margins.

    Meanwhile, Salman Amin, CEO of McVitie’s parent company Pladis, highlighted concerns over the diminishing case for investment in the UK.

    At the CBI conference, he described Britain as the group’s “greatest investment globally” but noted that the new fiscal environment is making it increasingly challenging to justify further capital allocation.

    Academic criticism of uniform tax policies

    Economists have criticized the government’s approach of applying blanket taxes on employers.

    Many argue that targeting excess profits through sector-specific levies would be a fairer and less disruptive solution.

    By taxing all employers equally, regardless of size or sector, the government risks hampering competitiveness, investment, and growth across the board.

    This one-size-fits-all approach could have lasting effects on the UK’s economic dynamism, at a time when the nation’s growth prospects are already under scrutiny.

    Despite the backlash, Chancellor Reeves maintains that the measures are essential for funding public services and correcting past economic mismanagement.

    She argues that the additional revenue will help rebuild the UK’s fiscal health while addressing critical needs in healthcare, education, and infrastructure.

    Critics argue that these measures will not only dent profitability for businesses but could also exacerbate unemployment and stifle investment, hindering the economy’s ability to recover and thrive.

    CBI’s blueprint for improving the UK business climate

    In response to the challenges posed by the budget, the CBI has announced plans to release a “Blueprint for Competitiveness.”

    The initiative aims to provide actionable recommendations for fostering a more supportive business environment.

    These include enhancing capital spending, simplifying the tax code, and prioritizing policies that attract investment and talent to the UK.

    Newton-Smith expressed cautious optimism about the government’s increased capital spending but emphasized the need for a more balanced fiscal approach to prevent long-term damage to the UK’s economic prospects.

    The post UK businesses in ‘damage control’ mode as £40bn tax hike sparks investment fears appeared first on Invezz

    The SPDR S&P 500 (SPY) has been in a strong uptrend this year, and the trend may continue if the Santa Claus rally happens. The fund, which has now become the second-biggest S&P 500 ETF after Vanguard, was trading at $597 on Monday. This article explains some of the top names in the S&P 500 and why ETFs like SPY, VOO, and IVV could reverse soon.

    Top SPY ETF companies in 2024

    The S&P 500 index has done well this year, helped by the artificial intelligence craze, strong corporate earnings, and the Federal Reserve rate cuts.

    The AI wave has helped to push companies like NVIDIA, Microsoft, and Google substantially higher this year. 

    Vistra Energy has been the best-performing company in the S&P 500 index this year as it jumped by over 300%.

    It was followed by Palantir and Nvidia, which have jumped by 276% and 174%, respectively. This rally has made NVIDIA the biggest company in the world, while Palantir’s market cap has jumped to $150 billion. 

    The other top performer in the index is GE Vernova whose shares have jumped sharply since it became a standalone company. Like Vistra, the rally is mostly because of the rising demand for energy prices to power data centers. 

    United Airlines stock has jumped by over 134% this year, making it the best-performing airline company in the US. It has also beaten its other global peers like IAG, Lufthansa, and KLM as it continues to boost its profits. 

    Constellation Energy stock price has jumped by 112% after the company partnered with Microsoft to restart a major nuclear power plant. The hope is that the firm will provide cheaper energy to power data centers. 

    Fair Isaac and Company, popularly known as FICO, has jumped by 102% as demand for credit scores continued rising. The other top performers in the S&P 500 index this year were companies like KKR, Dell, GoDaddy, Oracle, Royal Caribbean, Netflix, and Deckers Outdoor. 

    Walgreens Boots Alliance (WBA) was the worst-performing company in the S&P 500 index this year as it tumbled by 65%. The company is going through a rough patch as demand wanes and costs remains elevated. 

    Moderna shares have crashed by 56% as demand for the COVID-19 vaccine waned. Dolar Tree shares have retreated as comparable store sales have remained under pressure. 

    Intel is another top laggard in the S&P 500 index as demand for its products waned and as it lost market share in the AI industry. 

    The other worst-performing companies in the index are firms like Boeing, Biogen, Dexcom, Lululemon Athletica, and Humana. 

    S&P 500 index could reverse soon

    There are a few reasons why the S&P 500 index ETFs like SPY, VOO, and IVV could suffer a sharp reversal soon. 

    First, there is a threat of a trade war, which will hurt most companies in the US. History shows that tit-for-tat has not always worked well for companies that have a presence around the world. 

    Second, the ETFs could drop because they have formed a rising wedge chart pattern. On the chart above, we see that the fund has formed two converging trendlines that are nearing their confluence levels. 

    In most periods, financial assets tend to have a deep decline when the two lines near their confluence levels. If this decline happens, then the SPY ETF will drop to about $550, which is about 10% below the current level.

    Third, the index could drop because of a situation known as mean reversion, where assets often go back to their average prices. If this happens, then it may drop to the 200-day moving average of $540. 

    To be clear: such a correction will be brief, meaning that the index will bounce back as it has done in the past.

    The post 3 reasons S&P 500 index ETFs like SPY, IVV, VOO will reverse soon appeared first on Invezz

    The iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) continued its strong rally, reaching a record high of $244.8 this week. It has jumped by over 51% from its lowest level in 2023 as the American economy avoided a hard landing. This article looks at some of the best and worst-performing Russell 2000 stocks and whether it has more upside to go. 

    Top performing stocks in the IWM ETF

    Many companies in the Russell 2000 index have done well this year, helped by their respective industries and its strong performance.

    Genedx stock has soared by over 2,825% this year, helped by the ongoing demand of genomic testing in the United States. This rally has brought its market cap to over $2.21 billion.

    The other top-performing company in the IWM ETF is Sezzle, a leading player in the Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) industry that is doing well. Like Affirm and Klarna, the company enables users to buy and pay products with four installments. 

    Sezzle’s business has been doing fairly well, with its annual revenue surging from $13.3 million in 2019 to over $221 million in the trailing twelve months (TTM). It has also started to make a profit as it made $7.1 million in 2023 after making a $38.1 million loss a year earlier.

    Root Inc. stock price has also surged this year as demand for online insurance jumped. Its annual revenue has risen from $275 million in 2019 to almost $400 million last year. As we wrote on Lemonade, demand for online insurance solutions will likely continue rising.

    NuScale Power is another top-performing company in the IWM ETF as it jumped by over 750% this year. This growth happened as demand for nuclear energy rose among data center companies like Microsoft and Amazon. Analysts believe that the future of small modular reactors is bright, especially when there is scale. 

    Intuitive Machines stock has soared by 474% this year as the company continued to see more demand and increased backlog in its launches. 

    The other top-performing companies in the Russell 2000 index are Core Scientific, Nano Nuclear Energy, Avidity Biosciences, Rocket Lab, and Lumen Technologies. 

    The Russell 2000 index often has some of the best-performing companies in Wall Street. However, it also has a good track record of having some notable laggards. Canoo stock price has crashed by over 92% this year as concerns about its viability continues. 

    The other notable laggard in the index is Virgin Galactic, a company that has been in the business for over 20 years. Analysts expect the company to run out of money in either 2024 or 2025.

    Other companies that have underperformed the market this year are Marketwise, Luminar Technologies, Cassava Sciences, Chegg, and Digital Turbine. 

    IWM ETF analysis

    IWM chart by TradingView

    The weekly chart shows that the Russell 2000 ETF has been in a strong bullish trend in the past few months. It has now formed a cup and handle, which is made up of a rounded bottom and a consolidation at the top.

    To estimate the target with the C&H pattern, one needs to measure the size of the cup and extrapolate it from its upper side. In this case, the depth of the cup is about 33%, meaning that the fund could jump to $325 in the longer term.

    The IWM Fund has also remained above the 50-week and 200-week Exponential Moving Averages (EMA), a sign that there is still demand. Oscillators like the Relative Strength Index (RSI) and the MACD have all pointed upwards. 

    Therefore, the IWM Fund will likely continue rising although some consolidation is possible as it forms the handle section of the C&H pattern.

    The post IWM ETF hits ATH: Here’s why Russell 2000 rally will go on appeared first on Invezz

    The Nasdaq 100 index jumped to a record high this year, helped by the ongoing artificial intelligence wave and the Federal Reserve interest rate cuts. It soared to a high of $21,185 this month, bringing the year-to-date gains to 22.50%. This article looks at the best and worst performers in the index and why the Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) may reverse soon.

    Technology companies are doing well

    The Nasdaq 100 index has jumped, helped by NVIDIA, which has turned into the biggest company in the world with a valuation of over $3.4 trillion. NVIDIA’s growth happened as the company continued to fire on all cylinders, with its revenues in the first nine months of the month jumping to over $91 billion. 

    NVIDIA’s chips have seen substantial demand in the past few years, as companies like Microsoft, Google, and Amazon continue purchasing tons of them. The company has also benefited from its CUDA software that helps to configure general-purpose GPUs into ones that can be used in the AI industry.

    Constellation Energy stock has also jumped by 112%, making it the second-best performer in the Nasdaq 100 index. This stock surged after the company inked a partnership with Microsoft, the third-biggest company globally. The deal will see it restart a nuclear power plant and supply it to MSFT’s data centers.

    Arm Holdings, a top British company, has also done well this year as it jumped by 85%. Like NVIDIA, this performance is because of the AI industry. Also, Arm has one of the best business models since it mostly licenses its technology, which explains why it has a gross margin of 96%. 

    Trade Desk and other companies providing advertising technology like Zeta Global have done well amid resilient demand. TTD shares have soared by about 80% this year, making it one of the top performers in the index.

    The other top gainers in the Nasdaq 100 index this year are firms like Netflix, Meta Platforms, Fortinet, Intuitive Surgical, Marvell Technology, T-Mobile, and Broadcom. 

    A clear theme among the top performers is that most of them are in the artificial intelligence space that is booming. 

    The top laggards in the Nadaq 100 index are companies like Moderna, Dollar Tree, Intel, Biogen, Dexcom, Lululemon, Pdd Holdings, Globalfoundries, Idexx Laboratories, and Microchip Technology.

    Why the QQQ ETF stock may drop

    The Nasdaq 100 index has a long history of doing well and has constantly beaten other indices like the S&P 500, Russell 2000, and the Dow Jones. This growth happened because it is mostly made up of technology companies that have a track record of growth.

    Tech companies often have large moats, predictable revenues, and high margins. Think of a company like NVIDIA that has constantly innovated and launched new products that are hard to replicate.

    Still, there are three main reasons why the QQQ ETF may reverse soon. First, the fund has become highly overvalued as it trades at a PE ratio of 36. This is a big number, meaning that the index could go through a valuation reset soon, especially now that some companies are slowing down.

    Nasdaq 100 index chart by TradingView

    Second, the index could go through mean reversion, where an asset moves back to the moving average. In this case, it could drop by about 8.7% to move to the 200-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA). 

    Finally, the index, just like the S&P 500 index, has formed a rising wedge pattern, a popular bearish sign. This pattern has more room to run before it gets to its confluence zone, meaning that the correction could happen in 2025 as Donald Trump restarts his trade war.

    The post Here’s why Nasdaq 100 index ETF like QQQ could drop soon appeared first on Invezz

    United Airlines (UAL) stock price is beating other global airlines like IAG, the parent company of British Airways, Delta, American, and Southwest. Its stock has jumped by 150% this year, while IAG has jumped by 71.35%, Southwest’s 16%, and Delta Air Line’s 61%. This surge has brought its market cap to over $31.8 billion.

    United Airlines vs Delta vs IAG vs Southwest

    United Airlines stock price crossed a key level

    The weekly chart shows that the UAL share price has been in a strong bullish trend in the past few months. It has risen for 16 consecutive weeks, something it has never done before.

    The stock also recently made a golden cross pattern as the 50-week and 200-week Exponential Moving Averages (EMA) crossed each other. In most periods, this is usually one of the most bullish patterns, especially, when it happens on the weekly chart.

    United Airlines shares have also crossed the important resistance level at $64, its highest level in March 2021. Most notably, it has now just flipped the crucial resistance point at $95.85, its highest level in July 2019. 

    Other technicals are also bullish on the United Airlines share price. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) and the MACD indicators have continued to point upwards, with the former being at the extremely overbought level.

    Therefore, there is a likelihood that the stock will continue rising as bulls target the next key resistance level at $100. Still, the risk is that airlines are usually highly cyclical companies that rise and fall. As such, there is a likelihood that it will suffer a harsh reversal in the near term.

    UAL stock chart | Source: TradingView

    Why UAL stock is beating its peers

    There are several reasons why United Airlines is doing better than its global peers like Delta and American.

    The most important one is that the company did not fire its pilots during the COVID-19 pandemic. As such, when the industry reopened, it had ready staff as other companies battled with a substantial shortage.

    The company has also been at the forefront of its fleet modernization process, a costly move that will make it a more profitable firm in the future. It has ordered 110 new aircraft that will start being delivered in 2028. These places are 50 787-9s and 60 Airbus A321neos. Altogether, its order book is of about 270 planes.

    The company has also options for 50 787 and 40 more A321neo planes. It has also ordered 20 Boom Overture supersonic jets that are estimated to be faster and more efficient than the Concorde. 

    United Airlines is also growing at a faster pace than other companies. Its forward revenue growth is 10%, while Delta and American have much lower metrics. 

    Most importantly, this growth has come at a profitable level, a situation that has made UAL the second most profitable airline in the US after Delta. It has a net profit margin of 4.95% compared to Delta and America’s 7.7% and 0.51%.

    Read more: United Airlines to ‘capitalise on opportunity only $UAL has’ after Q1 earnings

    The most recent financial results showed that United’s pre-tax earnings came in at $1.3 billion as its earnings per share jumped. As a result, under Scott Kirby, United Airlines has started to return substantial sums of money to its shareholders, which explains why its stock has jumped. 

    In the last quarterly earnings, United Airlines said that it would repurchase up to $1.5 billion of outstanding shares. It is also adding new routes to Mongolia and Greenland in a bid to provide more services to its customers. 

    Additionally, the company is increasing its US business, where it is the third-biggest player. To do that, the company is up gauging, where it is replacing its smaller planes with bigger ones. 

    Therefore, United Airlines stock is soaring as investors cheer the shareholder returns and the hopes that it can catch up with Delta in terms of profitability. 

    The post Here’s why United Airlines stock is beating American, IAG, Delta appeared first on Invezz

    Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) stocks are doing well this year as it becomes one of the common ways for people to do their shopping. Affirm, one of the most popular BNPL companies, has risen by almost 50% this year, beating the S&P 500 index. 

    Similarly, Block, formerly known as Square, and the parent company of AfterPay, has risen by 25.6% this year. In Australia, Zip shares have jumped by over 400% this year, making it one of the best-performing companies in the industry.

    In Sweden, Klarna, one of the top companies in Europe, has announced that it will launch its Initial Public Offering (IPO) soon. Analysts expect that it will receive a valuation of between $20 billion and $15 billion, much lower than the $47 billion it received a few years ago. 

    This report focuses on Sezzle (SEZL), the best-performing BNPL stock in the United States this year.

    Why Sezzle stock has jumped

    Sezzle stock price has jumped by almost 2,200% this year, making it one of the top performers in the Russell 2000 index. This jump has helped to bring its market cap to over $2.2 billion. 

    Sezzle is similar to other BNPL companies in that it lets users buy products and pay in equal installments. Its primary product is known as Pay-in-Four, and it lets customers pay a fourth of their purchases up front and then another fourth every two weeks. 

    Unlike credit card companies, Sezzle does not charge customers for these products as long as they pay on time and link their banking details on the platform. As a result, it makes money through late fees and commissions it receives from retailers. 

    The company has also launched another product known as Pay-in-Full, which allows them to pay upfront using the platform. The benefit is that these customers can build their reputation and ensure that they are not denied credit in future. 

    Sezzle also offers a Pay-in-Two solution that is open to customers who don’t qualify for the pay-in-four offering. Its other solutions are the Sezzle Virtual Card, Sezzle Anywhere, Sezzle Premium, and Sezzle Up.

    SEZL growth is continuing

    These flexible offerings have helped the company supercharge its growth in the past few years. According to SeekingAlpha, its annual revenue has jumped from over $13.3 million in 2019 to over $159 million last year. Its revenue has soared to $221 million in the trailing twelve months.

    Analysts are optimistic that Sezzle’s revenue will continue growing in the next few years. Precisely, they believe that its annual revenue will rise to $247 million this year followed by $326 million next year. This growth prospects explains why its stock has jumped sharply.

    Most importantly, Sezzle has managed to turn a profit, with its trailing twelve-month profit jumping to over $56.1 million. Also, it has partnered with WebBank, a Utah bank that will be the originator of its loans.

    The most recent financial results showed that its business was continuing to see strong growth. Its active subscribers for its premium service jumped to 529,000 from 210,000 the same quarter in 2023. 

    Sezzle’s active customers jumped to 2.6 million, while the number of merchants on its platform jumped to 274,000. 

    Its revenue growth continued in the last quarter, jumping by 71.3% and hitting $70 million, while net income jumped to over $15 million.

    Sezzle stock price analysis

    The daily chart shows that the SEZL share price has been in a strong bull run in the past few months. It has remained above the 50-day and 25-day Exponential Moving Averages (EMA).

    Sezzle has also moved above the Ichimoku cloud indicator, meaning that bulls are in control. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) has been in a strong uptrend. Therefore, the stock will likely continue rising as bulls target the key resistance level at $500. 

    The post Forget Affirm, Block, and Klarna; this BNPL stock is killing it appeared first on Invezz

    The surge in popularity of meme coins, driven by endorsements from influential X personalities, has enticed countless investors with the promise of high returns.

    New research by CoinWire reveals the bleak truth: the majority of meme coins promoted by influencers are now worthless, leaving most investors facing significant losses.

    The study examined over 1,500 tokens endorsed by 377 influencers with at least 10,000 followers.

    Using data from Dune Analytics, analysts tracked the performance of these tokens over time, uncovering the instability and volatility plaguing this market.

    Meme coins collapse

    The CoinWire study categorizes a meme coin as “dead” if its value drops by 90% or more compared to its initial promotion.

    Shockingly, 76% of influencers have promoted tokens that meet this criteria, and two-thirds of all meme coins they endorse lose their value entirely.

    • Statistics highlight the rapid devaluation of these tokens:
    • One week after promotion: 80% lose 70% of their value.
    • One month later: 90% drop by 80%.
    • Three months in: 86% have fallen in price by tenfold.

    The analysis underscores the volatility and short lifespan of meme coins, particularly those promoted by high-profile influencers.

    Source: CoinWire

    Poor returns, but high influencer earnings

    While investors rarely see profits, influencers promoting meme coins consistently benefit financially. U

    sing TweetHunter’s earnings calculator, CoinWire estimates that influencers earn an average of $399 per promotional tweet, which typically generates around 15,000 views.

    Despite promoting dubious projects, influencers capitalize on the social media hype surrounding meme coins.

    Surprisingly, the study finds that the larger an influencer’s following, the worse the performance of their promoted tokens.

    Influencers with over 200,000 followers see meme coins losing 39% of their value within a week and 89% within three months.

    Source: CoinWire

    In contrast, smaller influencers—those with under 50,000 followers—show relatively better outcomes, with 25% of their promoted tokens yielding positive returns after a week and a 141% increase within three months.

    This disparity suggests that smaller influencers may take a more genuine approach to promotion, while larger influencers prioritise financial gains over the legitimacy of projects.

    Investors’ slim chances of high returns

    One of the main attractions of meme coins is their perceived potential to deliver substantial returns.

    Yet, the study finds that only 1% of influencers successfully promote tokens that achieve these returns.

    Moreover, just 3% of meme coins endorsed by influencers deliver the promised exponential growth.

    The data reveals that the meme coin hype, often fuelled by social media endorsements, rarely translates to meaningful gains for investors.

    Instead, the speculative nature of these investments leads to substantial financial losses for most.

    Why influencer-driven promotions are risky

    The CoinWire study highlights a fundamental issue with meme coin promotions: they are predominantly geared towards influencer profits rather than investor benefits.

    The study warns that investors should scrutinize the true value of promoted tokens and avoid making decisions based on social media hype alone.

    As the trend of influencer-driven promotions continues, it becomes clear that the majority of these tokens offer little to no intrinsic value.

    For ordinary investors, meme coins remain a high-risk, low-reward venture, with the odds heavily stacked against achieving significant profits.

    The post Why meme coins promoted on X are a bad bet for crypto investors appeared first on Invezz