Author

admin

Browsing

India’s stock market has suffered its steepest decline in over a year, with total market capitalisation slipping below $4 trillion for the first time since December 2023.

A combination of a weakening rupee, foreign capital flight, and stretched valuations has triggered a selloff that wiped out over $1 trillion in equity value.

The country’s benchmark indices, Sensex and Nifty, have declined 2.6 percent so far this year, while broader indices have faced an even sharper downturn.

The BSE MidCap index has tumbled more than 12 percent, and the SmallCap index has lost over 15 percent, signalling deeper concerns about market breadth.

Foreign institutional investors have pulled more than $10 billion from Indian equities in 2025, raising fears about the sustainability of India’s bull run.

India lags behind global markets

India’s 18.33 percent decline in total market capitalisation is the sharpest among global markets in 2025.

Zimbabwe follows closely with an 18.3 percent drop, while Iceland ranks third with an 18 percent decline, according to Bloomberg data.

Major global indices have largely outperformed India. The US, which remains the world’s largest stock market, has recorded a 3 percent increase in market capitalisation this year.

China and Japan have posted gains of 2.2 percent each, while markets in Hong Kong, Canada, the UK, and France have registered increases of 1.2 percent, 7.2 percent, 7.1 percent, and 9.9 percent, respectively.

India’s market struggles come amid concerns over economic growth, earnings uncertainty, and a volatile political landscape.

The Indian rupee has weakened by nearly 1.5 percent against the US dollar this year, making it the second-worst-performing currency in Asia after the Indonesian rupiah.

This depreciation has made Indian assets less attractive to foreign investors, further exacerbating the selloff.

Mid and small caps hit hardest

While India’s stock market had previously been a magnet for investors seeking high-growth opportunities, concerns over stretched valuations are now weighing on sentiment.

At the IFA Galaxy conference, ICICI Pru AMC’s CIO, S Naren, warned against systematic investment plans (SIPs) in mid- and small-cap funds, citing high valuations and market volatility.

His comments sparked a broader discussion among market participants about whether India’s equity market remains an attractive bet for long-term investors.

Notably, renowned valuation expert Aswath Damodaran has also raised concerns about India’s expensive market.

Despite India’s strong GDP growth, he has pointed out that its equities remain among the most overvalued globally.

Meanwhile, China’s Shanghai Composite has outperformed the Sensex, further fuelling debate about whether India’s premium valuations are justified.

Global risks pressure equities

Beyond domestic factors, global economic uncertainties are also contributing to India’s market downturn.

The possibility of a tariff war under a second Trump administration has created additional nervousness among investors.

With India being a major exporter of services and goods to the US, any shift in trade policy could have a significant impact on corporate earnings.

Bloomberg’s methodology for calculating market capitalisation excludes ETFs and ADRs, focusing only on actively traded primary securities on exchanges.

This approach aims to prevent double counting, though it results in lower aggregate values compared to other sources.

The post India’s market cap falls below $4 trillion: what’s behind the slump? appeared first on Invezz

India’s growing role in the global space economy took centre stage as Prime Minister Narendra Modi met with Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk in Washington.

While much of the media attention focused on a symbolic exchange—a heatshield tile from SpaceX’s Starship spacecraft—the meeting underscored deeper strategic interests.

The discussions revolved around artificial intelligence, sustainable development, and space collaboration, but a critical undercurrent was India’s ongoing regulatory debate over satellite internet.

As Starlink awaits licensing in India, the meeting signals the country’s push to position itself as a key player in space-based communications and emerging technologies.

Earlier in the day, the prime minister also met with President Trump.

India’s Starlink regulatory hurdle

India’s space programme has rapidly gained momentum, cementing its position as a formidable force in the global space industry.

Modi’s meeting with Musk came at a time when India is refining its regulatory framework for satellite broadband services—a sector where SpaceX’s Starlink is a major contender.

Starlink’s application to operate in India has been under scrutiny due to spectrum allocation disputes, particularly with Reliance Jio, a dominant player in the Indian telecom sector.

The Indian government has yet to finalise spectrum policies for satellite-based broadband, which could significantly impact how Starlink and other satellite internet providers enter the market.

The regulatory uncertainty has created a bottleneck for SpaceX, which had earlier faced pushback when it began pre-selling Starlink connections in India without government approval.

Strengthening US-India ties in tech

Beyond satellite internet, Modi and Musk’s discussions highlighted India’s broader efforts to collaborate with the US in AI development, space exploration, and sustainable technologies.

India’s recent signing of the Artemis Accords, a US-led initiative outlining global norms for space exploration, signals a shift towards deeper cooperation between the two countries.

SpaceX’s interest in India goes beyond Starlink, with potential future collaborations in rocket launches and reusable launch vehicle technology. AI was another key focus, as India works to integrate AI-driven solutions in governance and industry.

Musk’s Tesla is also closely monitoring India’s electric vehicle (EV) policy landscape, as the company eyes potential manufacturing opportunities in the country.

India’s push for AI leadership aligns with Musk’s own ambitions in the sector, with his AI firm xAI looking to challenge OpenAI.

As AI regulation becomes a global talking point, India’s policies on responsible AI deployment are increasingly relevant to US firms exploring partnerships in the region.

India’s push for global tech leadership

While Musk’s gift of a Starship heatshield tile to Modi grabbed headlines, the broader takeaway from the meeting is India’s positioning as a major stakeholder in the future of space-based communications and AI.

The country is navigating complex policy decisions that will shape its role in global satellite broadband and deep-tech innovation.

The meeting reflects India’s balancing act between fostering private-sector innovation and maintaining regulatory control over critical technologies.

As India refines its space and AI policies, partnerships with global tech giants like SpaceX and Tesla will be instrumental in shaping its future in these domains.

The post Elon Musk presents Indian PM Modi with a Starship heatshield tile from space appeared first on Invezz

Hong Kong-listed Chinese stocks extended their recent rally on Friday, fueled by growing optimism surrounding the nation’s advancements in artificial intelligence and renewed confidence in the market’s overall prospects.

The Hang Seng China Enterprises Index jumped as much as 3.1% on Friday, inching closer to surpassing an October peak following a recent stimulus push.

Breaching that level would mark the gauge’s highest point since February 2022.

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., Xiaomi Corp, and Tencent Holdings Ltd. were among the top contributors to the advance.

The CSI 300 Index, an onshore benchmark, also climbed 0.9%.

China’s ‘Sputnik moment’: AI capabilities spark re-evaluation

After lagging behind in the global AI race for several years, China is rapidly catching up.

The demonstrated prowess of AI startup DeepSeek has served as a “wake-up call” for investors who had previously underestimated the nation’s growth potential in the technology sector.

This has led to a broader reassessment of the previously beaten-down Chinese equity market.

According to Marvin Chen, a Bloomberg Intelligence strategist, The DeepSeek revelation “is a reflection that China is making progress on its new productive forces and self sufficiency goals. The tech momentum may carry the market into March,” when attention turns to the Two Sessions meeting and corporate earnings as the next driver, he added.

Signs of government support: a boost for private enterprise

Alibaba shares saw further gains following a report by Reuters that President Xi Jinping is planning to chair a conference next week with business figures, including Alibaba’s co-founder Jack Ma.

This event is interpreted as a strong signal of renewed government support for the private sector, boosting investor sentiment.

Adding to the wave of optimism are signs that Donald Trump’s tariffs on Chinese products — 10% in the initial offensive — may turn out to be less drastic than feared, further calming market anxieties.

A more durable rally? Sentiment shifts among global investors

While global money managers have been burnt by the Chinese market’s ups and downs over the past few years, some now see the odds of a more durable rally this time around.

Deutsche Bank called the ongoing tech progress a “Sputnik moment” for the country, while a trader note by Goldman Sachs Group Inc. said hedge funds are purchasing Chinese shares in large chunks, driven almost entirely by long buys.

Despite the enthusiasm, some remain skeptical, cautioning that the AI buzz may have fueled an overextended rally, with stocks seemingly responding indiscriminately to any announcement of cooperation with DeepSeek.

“At the end of the day, you don’t really know what the potential monetization opportunities are over the medium to longer term,” Helen Zhu, chief investment officer for NF Trinity, said in a Bloomberg TV interview.

There’s “potential uncertainty on whether what DeepSeek has been able to do can be repeated,” she added.

Looking ahead: stimulus expectations and economic challenges

Bulls are hoping Beijing will unleash further stimulus at the Two Sessions — the annual meetings of China’s top legislative and advisory bodies — helping to sustain the market’s upward trend.

Added policy support is crucial with the property sector still struggling and the economy remaining lackluster.

The Hang Sang China Enterprises Index has gained 13% so far in 2025, among the best performances in Asia.

It is about 1% away from taking out the October peak.

The post Chinese stocks surge on AI optimism, nearing three-year highs appeared first on Invezz

As cryptocurrencies have gained cultural momentum around the world, so has a dynamic approach to financial systems, particularly in LATAM, where a need for economic security complements financial innovation.

However, the tax treatment of cryptocurrency differs significantly across regions.

The report titled ‘Global Cryptocurrency Taxation Maps: A World-Wide Survey of Conservative Taxation vs. More Libertarian Approaches’ compares high crypto taxes in Latin American countries like Chile, Peru, and Mexico to lower rates in Panama and El Salvador.

Heavy taxes in Chile, Peru, and Mexico

According to Cointelegraph, Chile is a leading example of progressive taxation, with rates reaching up to 40% based on income level.

Crypto investors face one of the highest tax burdens in the country.

Peru has also implemented a tax structure on cryptocurrency earnings, with rates ranging from 5% to 30%.

The tax levied later depends on how much you made, thus these documents must be precise if investors are to contest the tax.

The punishing tax rates in Chile and Peru are significant compared to the benefits offered to crypto enthusiasts by the more permissive jurisdictions elsewhere, marking a stark difference in regulatory approaches.

As per the report, Mexico’s crypto market has a 20% flat tax rate for individual earners.

A similar tax structure has been implemented in countries like Brazil, Argentina, Costa Rica and Bolivia with rates from 15% to 20%, according to the report.

Colombia, on the other hand, has a much lower rate at about 10%.

These numbers show an increasing tendency for Latin American states to tax the emerging sector of cryptocurrency with tax revenues for the state and the subsequent regulation.

Panama and El Salvador: no crypto taxes

In terms of cryptocurrency taxation, Panama and El Salvador differ significantly from the other countries mentioned. Investors in Panama find it enticing as the government does not levy any taxes on crypto.

It is this lack of tax that attracts many crypto businesses and investors to Panama.

El Salvador had made headlines across the globe for its historic choice to adopt Bitcoin as a legal tender.

This is a further step in the right direction and the government does not charge taxes on Bitcoin.

Such status implies more crypto use within the state and places a country in the center of the digital currencies development field.

Taxes on crypto

According to the report, the regulatory landscape for crypto continues to change rapidly, with the taxation of crypto gains being one of the fastest-moving parts.

Tax systems have been subject to change in many countries across the globe as governments respond to international trends and local economic conditions.

The different tax rates we see in Latin America show how governments are attempting to balance the need to receive taxes from a growing sector.

With increasing numbers of its citizens and businesses embracing cryptocurrencies, these governments now have to regulate a market that can be volatile while being careful not to curb growth and innovation with heavy taxes.

The research demonstrates the complexity and, in many cases, contradictions that exist in Latin America’s tax regulation landscape.

Panama and El Salvador enjoy tax exemptions for cryptocurrency, while Chile, Peru, and Mexico have high taxes on it.

The key will be staying sharp and adjusting to this moving landscape.

As the global conversation on digital money develops, the subtleties of cryptocurrency tax will make a significant difference.

The post LATAM crypto tax divide: El Salvador and Panama exempt, Chile and Mexico impose top rates appeared first on Invezz

President Donald Trump held his first confirmed conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday, describing it as a “lengthy and highly productive” discussion aimed at ending the war in Ukraine.

The call, which lasted nearly 90 minutes, signals a shift in US policy, with Trump prioritizing a US-backed resolution to the conflict that has dragged on for more than two years.

“We discussed Ukraine, the Middle East, Energy, Artificial Intelligence, the power of the Dollar, and various other subjects,” Trump wrote in a post on the social media platform Truth Social.

“We each talked about the strengths of our respective nations and the great benefit that we will someday have in working together,” Trump added.

“But first, as we both agreed, we want to stop the millions of deaths taking place in the War with Russia/Ukraine.”

The primary focus remained on peace negotiations, which Trump suggested could begin “immediately.”

Trump signals shift in US approach to Ukraine war

Trump’s announcement that negotiations would commence raises questions about Ukraine’s role in the process.

While he stated that he would brief Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, he did not specify whether Kyiv would have equal footing in the talks with Moscow.

“…we will begin by calling President Zelenskyy, of Ukraine, to inform him of the conversation, something which I will be doing right now…”, he said.

Trump has long been skeptical of Ukraine’s leadership and has not openly expressed strong support for Zelensky.

Meanwhile, the Kremlin portrayed the discussion as a diplomatic breakthrough.

Russian government spokesman Dmitri Peskov said Putin and Trump agreed that “the time has come for our countries to work together” and confirmed that Trump was invited to visit Moscow.

The Russian leader also insisted that addressing the “root causes” of the Ukraine conflict was essential, a position that suggests Russia will demand significant concessions from Ukraine before agreeing to a cease-fire.

Return to Ukraine’s pre-2014 border ‘unrealistic’

While the call between Trump and Putin was taking place, US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth made remarks at NATO headquarters in Brussels that suggested a shift in Washington’s position on Ukraine’s territorial ambitions.

He described restoring Ukraine’s borders to pre-2014 levels—before Russia annexed Crimea—as an “unrealistic” goal.

He also stated that the US would not support Ukraine’s NATO membership as part of a peace agreement, echoing one of Putin’s key demands.

Hegseth’s comments, combined with Trump’s phone call, indicate that Washington may push Ukraine toward a compromise that falls short of its stated objectives.

European nations, which have supported Ukraine militarily and economically, are likely to scrutinize any emerging US-Russia framework.

UN welcomes potential for negotiations

The United Nations responded to the news by saying it welcomed any initiative that could lead to peace talks.

UN spokesman Farhan Haq stated that any process involving both Russia and Ukraine “would be a welcome development.”

However, he emphasized that any negotiation should include Ukrainian representatives, a point Trump did not explicitly confirm.

Trump announced that his negotiating team would include Secretary of State Marco Rubio, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, National Security Adviser Michael Waltz, and Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff.

Witkoff was in Moscow earlier this week and helped secure the release of Marc Fogel, an American schoolteacher imprisoned in Russia for over three years.

Notably absent from Trump’s list was retired General Keith Kellogg, whom he previously named as his envoy for Russia and Ukraine.

US-Russia relations amid Ukraine war

For Putin, the call marked a symbolic victory, signaling the end of Western efforts to isolate him diplomatically following Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

Since Trump’s reelection, the Kremlin has expressed optimism about a potential shift in US policy, with Putin frequently praising Trump in public statements.

Trump, while occasionally critical of Putin in the past, has often spoken admiringly of the Russian leader.

Following the Ukraine invasion in 2022, Trump described Putin as a “genius,” though he took a different tone after his second inauguration, saying Putin’s war effort had been mismanaged.

“He can’t be thrilled, he’s not doing so well,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on his first day in office.

“Russia is bigger, they have more soldiers to lose, but that’s no way to run a country.”

As Trump prepares to navigate the complex dynamics of US-Russia relations, his approach to Ukraine is likely to face resistance from both US allies and members of Congress.

While his administration moves toward negotiations, the extent to which Ukraine will be involved—and what compromises it may be asked to make—remains uncertain.

The post Trump speaks with Putin on ending Ukraine war, says peace negotiations could start ‘immediately’ appeared first on Invezz

US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has made it clear that the Trump administration sees Ukraine’s pre-2014 borders as an unattainable goal and does not support NATO membership as a resolution to the ongoing war.

Speaking at a high-level NATO summit in Brussels, Hegseth urged European allies to take greater responsibility for regional security, marking a pivotal shift in US policy toward the nearly three-year-old conflict.

“We want, like you, a sovereign and prosperous Ukraine. But we must start by recognizing that returning to Ukraine’s pre-2014 borders is an unrealistic objective,” Hegseth told representatives from over 40 nations supporting Kyiv.

He warned that pursuing such a goal would only extend the war and increase suffering.

His remarks come as Russia continues to hold about 20% of Ukraine’s territory, including Crimea—annexed in 2014—and parts of eastern Donbas, where Moscow-backed separatists have waged a prolonged insurgency.

Hegseth stressed that any lasting peace deal must include “robust security guarantees” to prevent future conflict.

However, he dismissed NATO membership for Ukraine as an impractical outcome, suggesting instead that European and non-European forces should provide security assurances.

“If these troops are deployed as peacekeepers to Ukraine at any point, they should be part of a non-NATO mission and should not fall under NATO’s Article 5 obligations,” he stated, reinforcing the US stance on limiting direct military engagement.

With Washington shifting its focus, the Trump administration is signaling that European nations must take the lead in securing long-term stability in the region.

The post Trump administration sees Ukraine’s pre-2014 borders as an unattainable goal appeared first on Invezz

JPMorgan analyst Samik Chatterjee remains bearish on Super Micro Computer Inc (NASDAQ: SMCI) even after it guided for $40 billion in revenue in its fiscal 2026.

Chatterjee is focused more on the fact that SMCI missed estimates in its fiscal second quarter and lowered its full-year revenue outlook last night.

He continues to rate Supermicro stock at “underweight” and sees a downside in it to $35 which indicates potential for about a 15% decline from current levels.

Why does JPM remain dovish on SMCI stock?

Usually, investors tend to give precedence to the future outlook on the current quarter results.

But the JPM analyst remains unimpressed with Super Micro Computer’s guidance as he’s not entirely convinced that the AI server company will be able to push its revenue up to $40 billion next year in the first place.

“SMCI has to bring execution proof points before credit for its aggressive FY26 revenue/margin expectations,” he told clients in a research note on Wednesday.

Note that Supermicro stock does not currently pay a dividend either, which makes it unattractive for those interested in setting up an additional source of passive income as well.

Supermicro stock faces increased competition

Samik Chatterjee expects supply chain constraints to have weighed on Supermicro’s Q2 earnings.

He cautions against owning SMCI stock at current levels as these issues could remain a meaningful headwind moving forward as well.

Additionally, the “upcoming AI server product cycle represents a much higher competitive backdrop with peers now boasting stronger portfolios and looking to more meaningfully participate in the industry,” the analyst added in his report.

Others including Matt Bryson of Wedbush Securities and Quinn Bolton of Needham also expect Super Micro Computer to fall short of its revenue guidance for fiscal 2026.

Plus, much of the good news already looks backed into SMCI shares considering they’ve already rallied more than 50% over the past two weeks.

Super Micro Computer Q2 earnings highlights

On Tuesday, the Nasdaq-listed firm reported 59 cents of per-share earnings (adjusted) on $5.65 billion in revenue.

Analysts, in comparison, were at 61 cents a share and $5.77 billion, respectively.

Super Micro Computer also lowered its guidance for fiscal 2025 last night to a maximum of $25 billion.

Its earlier guidance was for $26 billion to $30 billion instead. Still, Charles Liang – the company’s chief executive told investors in the earnings release:

With our leading direct-liquid cooling technology and over 30% of new data centres expected to adopt it in the next 12 months, Supermicro is well positioned to grow AI infrastructure design wins based on Nvidia Blackwell and more.

Last week, the company based out of San Jose, California announced full production availability of its AI data center Building Block Solutions powered by Nvidia’s latest Blackwell platform.

The post JPMorgan remains unimpressed with Supermicro despite ambitious guidance appeared first on Invezz

US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has made it clear that the Trump administration sees Ukraine’s pre-2014 borders as an unattainable goal and does not support NATO membership as a resolution to the ongoing war.

Speaking at a high-level NATO summit in Brussels, Hegseth urged European allies to take greater responsibility for regional security, marking a pivotal shift in US policy toward the nearly three-year-old conflict.

“We want, like you, a sovereign and prosperous Ukraine. But we must start by recognizing that returning to Ukraine’s pre-2014 borders is an unrealistic objective,” Hegseth told representatives from over 40 nations supporting Kyiv.

He warned that pursuing such a goal would only extend the war and increase suffering.

His remarks come as Russia continues to hold about 20% of Ukraine’s territory, including Crimea—annexed in 2014—and parts of eastern Donbas, where Moscow-backed separatists have waged a prolonged insurgency.

Hegseth stressed that any lasting peace deal must include “robust security guarantees” to prevent future conflict.

However, he dismissed NATO membership for Ukraine as an impractical outcome, suggesting instead that European and non-European forces should provide security assurances.

“If these troops are deployed as peacekeepers to Ukraine at any point, they should be part of a non-NATO mission and should not fall under NATO’s Article 5 obligations,” he stated, reinforcing the US stance on limiting direct military engagement.

With Washington shifting its focus, the Trump administration is signaling that European nations must take the lead in securing long-term stability in the region.

The post Trump administration sees Ukraine’s pre-2014 borders as an unattainable goal appeared first on Invezz

Circle’s USDC stablecoin has reached an all-time high market capitalization of over $56 billion, signaling renewed growth in the stablecoin sector.

The surge comes as decentralized finance (DeFi) activity picks up, particularly on the Solana blockchain, boosting USDC adoption and demand.

Over the past month, USDC added $10.2 billion to its market cap, significantly outpacing the $4.6 billion increase in Tether’s USDT, according to Artemis data.

Despite the surge, USDT remains the dominant stablecoin, with a market capitalization of $142 billion.

This milestone marks a full recovery for USDC after the 2023 US regional banking crisis, which temporarily caused the stablecoin to lose its peg to the US dollar.

Circle had held part of its reserves in Silicon Valley Bank, which collapsed, leading to a temporary loss of confidence among investors.

Meanwhile, Tether capitalized on the shift, surpassing its 2022 market cap peak by May 2023.

Stablecoins, such as USDT and USDC, play a crucial role in crypto markets by providing liquidity and facilitating trading on exchanges.

Their growing supply is often viewed as a key indicator of investor confidence and market strength.

Recent data shows that stablecoin expansion, particularly in USDT and USDC, has accelerated in recent weeks, aligning with previous periods of strong Bitcoin (BTC) and altcoin rallies.

While macroeconomic uncertainties persist, the rapid growth of stablecoins signals renewed investor interest and a potentially bullish outlook for the broader cryptocurrency market.

Trump open to considering USDC for strategic reserves

Meanwhile, the Trump administration is reportedly considering integrating cryptocurrencies such as XRP, Solana, and USDC into a national strategic reserve.

According to a New York Post report, the Trump transition team is exploring the establishment of an “America-first strategic reserve”.

However, some within the crypto sector worry that emphasizing alternative coins may dilute efforts to legitimize Bitcoin, the world’s largest cryptocurrency, which remains central to discussions of a strategic Bitcoin reserve.

The post USDC market cap surges past $56B as stablecoin demand reaches new highs appeared first on Invezz

Elon Musk’s social media platform X, formerly Twitter, has agreed to pay approximately $10 million to settle a lawsuit brought by President Donald Trump and other plaintiffs over the platform’s decision to ban him in the wake of the January 6, 2021, US Capitol riot, as per a WSJ report.

Trump initially filed the lawsuit in 2021 against Twitter and its then-CEO Jack Dorsey, alleging the deplatforming violated his rights.

Trump used the platform extensively after losing the 2020 election to spread false claims of voter fraud and to rally supporters to attend the “Stop the Steal” event, which led to the Capitol attack.

Twitter at the time stated that the suspension was necessary to prevent further violence.

Twitter suspended Trump’s account two days after the riots, citing concerns over incitement to violence.

The lawsuit was part of a broader legal effort targeting major social media companies, including Meta (formerly Facebook) and Google, for suspending Trump’s accounts following the Capitol riots.

In November 2022, after acquiring Twitter, Musk reinstated Trump’s account following a public poll, signaling a shift in platform policy under his leadership.

Trump and social media settlements

X will pay about $10 million to settle litigation over the suspension of Donald Trump’s account.

The settlement marks the conclusion of a legal battle that had been appealed after a federal judge dismissed the case in 2022.

Earlier this week, a motion to dismiss the appeal was granted following the agreement, as per the report.

The settlement comes just a month after Meta agreed to pay $25 million to resolve a similar lawsuit regarding Trump’s Facebook account.

Of the amount, $22 million was allocated to Trump’s presidential library. The remaining $3 million was set aside for Trump’s legal fees and other plaintiffs who joined the lawsuit.

Meanwhile, Trump’s legal team is reportedly seeking a settlement with Google over its decision to ban him from YouTube after the Capitol riots.

Elon Musk, now heading the Department of Government Efficiency under Trump’s administration, has drawn criticism for his close ties to the president.

In December, ABC News agreed to a $15 million settlement to resolve a defamation lawsuit filed by Donald Trump.

As part of the agreement, ABC News stated that the settlement amount would be donated to Trump’s future presidential foundation and museum.

Musk and Trump

A close adviser to the president, Musk has expressed strong support for Trump, contributing over $250 million to his campaign.

Since the beginning of Trump’s presidency, Musk has been leading the newly established Department of Government Efficiency, a government cost-cutting initiative.

In this role, Musk has spearheaded efforts to rapidly reduce the size of the federal government.

Representatives from Doge, a team aligned with Musk’s initiative, have been deployed to various departments to monitor spending, while offering millions of federal employees voluntary exit packages.

Additionally, the initiative has moved to freeze federal funding and halt the work of certain agencies, including the US Agency for International Development (USAID).

The post Elon Musk’s X settles Trump lawsuit, to pay around $10M appeared first on Invezz