The Bank of Canada (BoC) is preparing to make a substantial statement regarding decreasing its key policy interest rate, with strong expectations for a 50 basis point fall on Wednesday.

This anticipated decision is primarily in response to persisting and significant worries about stubbornly low unemployment rates and poor economic development, both of which indicate a rising need for robust financial assistance measures to stimulate the economy.

Various analysts and economists have stated that, despite prior cuts aimed at stimulating growth, the economy has failed to show the necessary increase in consumer demand, a critical engine of economic vitality.

The necessity for action has become even more urgent as signs continue to depict a gloomy picture of the current economic landscape.

Concerns about potential market panic

While the vast majority of financial professionals approve of this dramatic monetary move, a minority voice within the financial world expresses worry that repeated cuts of 50 basis points may accidentally instil fear among market players.

This organization believes that such a significant decline may act as a warning flag, indicating that the Canadian economy is approaching a key tipping point, potentially mirroring conditions experienced during more severe economic downturns in the past.

This sentiment, which permeates discussions among financial strategists, raises important questions about the effectiveness of aggressive monetary policies in not only reviving economic confidence but also stimulating sustained growth in an environment characterized by uncertainty and volatility.

Economic growth falling behind projections

Recent assessments by several economic research teams point to a disturbing trend, showing that Canada’s economic growth has fallen severely short of the Bank of Canada’s previous predictions for the third quarter.

Furthermore, early data suggest that the predicted GDP for the fourth quarter may fall short of expectations.

The central bank’s prior attempts to stimulate economy through a series of four rounds of interest rate cuts—from an approximate high of 5% to 3.75%—did not provide the expected results in terms of increasing consumer demand.

This disturbing trend raises serious questions about the long-term consequences of such policy choices, as well as their overall efficacy in delivering the stated outcomes of sustainable economic growth and higher living standards for Canadians.

Inflation is stabilizing within target range

Interestingly, even as the Bank of Canada prepares to implement additional monetary easing measures, inflation has been relatively constant, consistently remaining within the Bank’s goal range of 1% to 3%.

In combination with this stability, jobless rates have reached levels not seen in nearly eight years, excluding the pandemic period, when unconventional economic measures were in play.

These contrasting economic figures present a complex and multifaceted backdrop for the BoC as it navigates its decision-making process, balancing the delicate interplay between stimulating growth and controlling inflation.

Analysts are increasingly arguing that while inflation remains stable, the persistent and troubling underperformance of the labour market, coupled with overall economic activity, necessitates urgent and decisive action from the central bank to safeguard economic stability and growth.

Neutral interest rate considerations

Dustin Reid, Vice President and Chief Strategist of Fixed Income at Mackenzie Investments has pointed out that the Bank of Canada may have determined that the economy is now functioning below its potential—a scenario known as “excess supply.”

Reid also stated that the current economic climate is not projected to improve significantly until at least 2026, prompting the central bank to consider moving more quickly toward its neutral interest rate range.

This neutral range, which is normally set between 2.25% and 3.25%, tries to provide a balanced approach that promotes economic growth while avoiding undue inflationary pressures.

A reduction in interest rates to 3.25%, the upper limit of this range, would demonstrate the bank’s intention to further stimulate demand in the economy while also working to mitigate the looming risks of a recession, which could have far-reaching consequences for the country’s finances.

Polls and market sentiment point to rate cut

According to a recent Reuters poll, a significant majority of economists—approximately 80%, or 21 out of 27 respondents—believe the Bank of Canada will decrease interest rates by 50 basis points in the impending announcement.

Meanwhile, currency markets are expressing a strong preference for this outcome, with 88% of investors betting for a half-point reduction in the main interest rate.

Despite the strong consensus among many market participants, certain economic experts have urged a guarded caution.

One such voice is Royce Mendes, Head of Macro Strategy at Desjardins Group, who has warned that implementing such a significant reduction could be viewed as a mistake, especially given the current uncertainties surrounding the trajectory of Canada’s economic recovery and stability.

A decision with multiple implications

As the Bank of Canada prepares to deliver its highly anticipated interest rate decision, the repercussions will surely ripple throughout the financial landscape.

With competing pressures, including the pressing need to spur economic development while ensuring market stability, experts, investors, and policymakers will closely evaluate the decision to impose another significant interest rate drop.

Whether this strategic move proves effective in reinvigorating the economic landscape of Canada and restoring confidence in the markets remains an open question, one that will be watched closely as the unfolding economic narrative develops in the coming weeks and months.

The post Bank of Canada likely to reduce key interest rate amid economic concerns appeared first on Invezz

The European automobile industry finds itself at a critical juncture as it transitions toward electrification.

Mounting competition from Chinese manufacturers, stricter carbon regulations, and subdued demand for electric vehicles (EVs) are creating a volatile environment.

Industry analysts warn that the challenges of 2024 will likely persist into 2025, with little respite for automakers, according to a report by CNBC.

EV transition faces bottlenecks

The shift to EVs has proven more difficult than anticipated for Europe’s automakers.

While many governments are pushing for faster adoption, the industry faces several bottlenecks.

The availability of affordable EV models remains limited, and the rollout of charging infrastructure has been slower than promised.

Interest rates, which have risen sharply over the past year, have also weighed heavily on consumer demand.

Julia Poliscanova, senior director for vehicles and e-mobility supply chains at Transport & Environment, said automakers are partly to blame for their current predicament.

“They are behind on electrification, their products are just not as good as the formidable Chinese competition – and that is not anyone’s fault but the carmakers,” Poliscanova told CNBC, emphasizing that car sales in Europe remain below pre-pandemic levels.

Rules on emissions another issue for automakers

A critical issue facing automakers is the European Union’s tightening cap on average emissions from new vehicle sales.

Starting in 2025, the cap will drop to 93.6 grams of CO2 per kilometer, a 15% reduction from the 2021 baseline.

Exceeding these limits could result in hefty fines, adding financial strain to automakers already grappling with supply chain disruptions and softening demand.

The European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (ACEA), which represents major players like BMW, Volkswagen, and Renault, has urged regulators to ease compliance costs while maintaining the broader goals of green mobility.

The ACEA cited sluggish EV sales and a deteriorating economic climate as reasons for flexibility.

Critics, however, argue that any relaxation of regulations would harm Europe’s long-term competitiveness.

“Delaying the targets is not a solution,” said Poliscanova. “It will only delay the inevitable transition that automakers need to undergo.”

Poliscanova described calls for looser regulations as “really frustrating,” arguing that tougher targets are essential to drive innovation and competitiveness.

Bank of America’s Horst Schneider offered a more pragmatic view, suggesting that some flexibility might be necessary to help automakers bridge the gap between EV costs and consumer acceptance.

“The pricing gap between EVs and internal combustion vehicles is still too wide, and mass-market carmakers need more time to adjust,” Schneider said.

Chinese competition poses a growing threat

Chinese carmakers have quickly become a dominant force in the EV market, leveraging their expertise in affordable production and efficient supply chains.

European automakers, by contrast, have been slower to scale their EV offerings.

This disparity is increasingly evident in market dynamics.

Chinese brands have captured significant market share in Europe by offering high-quality EVs at lower price points, leaving traditional European brands scrambling to compete.

“The gap is clear,” said Poliscanova.

“European automakers are behind on electrification, and their delay only makes it harder to compete against China’s advanced offerings.”

Market performance: Auto stocks struggle

The financial challenges facing Europe’s automakers are mirrored in their stock market performance.

Shares of the “big five” — Volkswagen, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Stellantis, and Renault — have seen significant declines in 2024, with Stellantis suffering the steepest drop at 37% year-to-date.

Volkswagen and BMW have also faced double-digit losses, while Renault has been the lone bright spot.

The French automaker’s shares have climbed 19% amid hopes that its limited exposure to the US and Chinese markets might insulate it from some of the global headwinds.

Despite Renault’s relative success, analysts at Deutsche Bank maintain a cautious outlook for the broader industry.

“Automotive stocks are having a hard time globally,” analysts at Deutsche Bank said in a research note published Dec 9.

“Unfortunately, we believe the industry is likely to head into another year of volatility and headwinds across regions. We expect more noise of potential policy implications in the US, further restructuring announcements in Europe, muted demand ex China and pricing to soften,” they added.

Cheaper EVs key to Europe’s EV transition, say analysts

Affordability has emerged as a central challenge for Europe’s EV transition.

While several automakers unveiled low-cost EV models at the Paris Motor Show in October, these vehicles are not expected to reach the market until 2025.

Analysts believe that bridging the price gap between EVs and traditional internal combustion vehicles will be critical for boosting consumer demand.

“What people need is cheaper EVs, and those are still in development,” said Schneider.

Cheaper EVs could help automakers reclaim market share from Chinese competitors and accelerate the transition to green mobility.

However, this will require significant investment in production efficiency and battery technology.

Challenges likely to persist in 2025

The economic backdrop for the European auto industry remains challenging.

Higher interest rates, muted demand outside of China, and pricing pressures are likely to persist in 2025.

Rico Luman, senior sector economist for transport and logistics at ING, said profitability would remain a concern as automakers shift their focus to less lucrative EV models.

“They tend to focus on hybrids because of the profitability, but if they are forced to move fully to EVs, it will affect their financials,” Luman told CNBC.

The post European carmakers’ struggles likely to continue in 2025, analysts forecast appeared first on Invezz

As Indian equity markets grapple with stiff valuations, investors are increasingly exploring international opportunities, particularly in the United States.

Wall Street’s recent strong performance, led by technology stocks, has made US equity mutual funds a viable diversification strategy.

According to a report by The Economic Times, financial planners are recommending investors to allocate 5-10% of their equity portfolios to US markets, staggering investments over the next year to mitigate risks from the sharp run-up in valuations.

Indian vs US equities: a valuation snapshot

At present, the S&P 500 trades at a price-to-earnings (PE) ratio of 25.41, slightly lower than the Nifty 500’s 26.5.

Vishal Dhawan, founder of Plan Ahead Wealth Advisors, notes in the report,

At the broad index level, valuations of Indian and US equities are similar. Several US companies are expected to show strong growth.

Dhawan advocates systematic investment plans (SIPs) in funds like Franklin US Opportunities Fund for those with a higher risk tolerance.

Some diversified and sectoral equity mutual fund schemes have a provision to allocate up to 35% to overseas equities.

Schemes like PPFAS Flexicap Fund have a mandate to invest in global companies.

Indian and US markets together exposes an investor to 30% of global GDP

The US accounts for approximately 25% of global GDP and hosts unique businesses in emerging sectors, making it an attractive destination for Indian investors.

A note from Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund highlights that combining investments in the US and Indian markets provides exposure to 30% of global GDP.

Additionally, the low correlation between US and Indian markets helps reduce portfolio volatility, enhancing risk-adjusted returns.

Over the past year, the S&P 500 surged 37%, outpacing the Nifty 500’s 25.29% gain.

“The US markets are up sharply, led by technology stocks in the last one year, but the move ahead is not going to be one-sided,” said Vineet Nanda, founder, SIFT capital.

Nanda believes investors could stagger investments and use a buy on dips approach.

However, wealth managers caution against over-allocating to the US.

Feroze Azeez, deputy CEO of Anand Rathi Wealth, warns, “The US market faces geopolitical risks, inflationary pressures, and Federal Reserve policy uncertainties.”

Investors should maintain a strong domestic equity position while considering small allocations to US equities.

Regulations limit options for US equity investments

Despite the appeal, Indian investors face limited options for US equity investments, distributors say.

This is because the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) enforces a cap of $7 billion for mutual funds and an additional $1 billion for exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

This restriction limits the availability of funds focusing on mid- and small-cap US stocks or sectors outside technology.

Many fund houses have halted new investments due to these limits.

For those keen on US exposure, options include large-cap-focused funds or Nasdaq 100 ETFs, which are heavily weighted towards technology.

Furthermore, international funds enjoy favourable tax treatment, with a long-term capital gains tax of 12.5% after a two-year holding period.

The post Are you an Indian investor looking to play the Wall Street rally? Here’s how to do it appeared first on Invezz

The stock market’s recent retreat has left traders on edge, even as the S&P 500 remains close to its record highs.

Despite a two-day pullback of just 0.9%, Wall Street’s fear gauge, the CBOE VIX index, has risen by 11%, signalling that some market participants are wary of a deeper correction.

Momentum stocks, which had driven the market’s rally in recent months, showed signs of faltering this week.

The reversal in popular plays on Monday, followed by a decline in the S&P 500 on Tuesday, has raised concerns that market strength may be running out of steam.

However, the broader picture remains relatively optimistic. The S&P 500 is still up 26.5% year-to-date and sits just under 1% from its record high.

For many investors, the rally can be attributed to the so-called “Trump trade” — a bet on stocks expected to benefit from President-elect Donald Trump’s policies.

This trend has supported key sectors like technology and defence, especially as the election result signalled a continuation of pro-business policies.

Cathie Wood’s ARK funds rally on Trump’s re-election

Cathie Wood, known for her ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK), has seen a resurgence since Trump’s re-election.

The ARKK, which famously invested in high-growth tech stocks like Tesla, Roku, and Twilio, dropped dramatically in mid-2021 but has regained momentum, jumping 27.6% since Trump’s victory.

Tesla’s resurgence has been a major driver of ARKK’s performance, considering it comprises 10% of the fund.

However, another ARK fund, the Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW), has outperformed ARKK.

With a 29.5% increase since the election, ARKW has more significant exposure to sectors benefiting from Trump’s policies, such as crypto and defence.

The fund’s 11.5% weighting in the ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF has added substantial value following the recent rally in Bitcoin prices, signalling the growing interest in cryptocurrency under a pro-business, crypto-friendly administration.

ARKW: A stronger proxy for Trump 2.0

While ARKK has captured most of the attention, analysts like Todd Sohn, ETF and technical strategist at Strategas Securities, argue that ARKW is a stronger bet for those looking to capitalize on Trump’s second term.

With its 10% Tesla weighting, alongside stakes in Palantir Technologies and Bitcoin, ARKW stands out as a more direct proxy for the so-called “Trump 2.0” trade.

Palantir’s rise, driven partly by hopes for increased government defence contracts, further strengthens ARKW’s appeal.

The fund also includes exposure to cryptocurrency-related stocks like Coinbase and Robinhood, which are seen as benefiting from Trump’s crypto-supportive stance.

The outlook for ARK ETFs and the broader market

Despite the recent rally, some ARK funds, especially ARKK, have seen outflows.

There are over 2,600 equity ETFs on the market, and Sohn points out that strong past performance doesn’t guarantee continued success.

However, for those bullish on Trump’s policies and their market impact, ARKW remains a compelling option, given its exposure to key growth sectors like crypto, Tesla, and defence.

For now, despite the brief market retreat, the underlying bullish trend fueled by the Trump trade and favorable policies continues to propel certain ETFs to new highs.

The post Trump 2.0 could boost this Cathie Wood fund—Hint: it’s not ARKK appeared first on Invezz

Ukraine’s economy has been going through one of the most challenging periods in modern European history. 

Nearly three years into Russia’s invasion, the country is still facing an uphill battle to rebuild its economy once the war ends. 

Ukraine’s economy has managed to survive and adapt.

However, labor shortages, fiscal strain, and a fragile energy sector are still obstacles that have to be surpassed.

It’s still uncertain when the war will end, and most importantly, what will Ukraine’s economy look like afterwards.

A history of economic resilience

The war’s onset in February 2022 triggered an economic freefall.

Ukraine’s GDP contracted by 29.1% in 2022, one of the sharpest declines in Europe’s history, driven by disrupted supply chains, lost territories, and destroyed infrastructure. 

But 2023 surprised many analysts as GDP rebounded with 5.3% growth, propelled by international aid, private sector adaptability, and efforts to restore critical infrastructure.

Growth has slowed in 2024, with projections of 4% GDP growth fueled by defense spending, agricultural exports, and a recovering metallurgical industry.

The OECD projects further deceleration, with growth moderating to 2.5% in 2025 and 2% in 2026, assuming the war continues.

Labor shortages and logistical disruptions are some of the country’s biggest challenges.

Businesses have relocated to western Ukraine, and some sectors, like IT, have flourished.

However, structural damage to industries like agriculture and steel has left lasting scars.

The winners and losers of Ukraine’s economy

Agriculture has suffered from destroyed farmlands, Black Sea port blockades, and disrupted exports.

Grain shipments dropped by 50% in 2022, though alternative land routes have supported some recovery.

Between January and July 2024, agriculture accounted for 63.1% of exports, with a modest 7.6% year-on-year growth in US dollar terms.

Despite these gains, the sector faces high shipping costs and international trade barriers.

Ukraine’s steel industry contracted by over 80% in 2022 as key facilities were occupied.

A modest 8% growth was recorded in 2023, but energy shortages and infrastructure damage continue to slow recovery. 

Ukraine’s IT sector has been a winner, generating $7.3 billion in export revenues in 2023.

Digital-first initiatives, such as the government’s Diia platform, have streamlined services and attracted international investment.

The sector has become a critical economic pillar, demonstrating adaptability through remote operations and relocation.

Energy remains a significant vulnerability.

Russian missile strikes have caused widespread power outages, leaving urban centers particularly exposed.

While Ukraine has sought renewable energy solutions and received international support to repair power plants, the International Energy Agency (IEA) warns that this winter will test the country’s fragile grid.

Fitch affirms a bleak outlook

On December 6, Fitch reaffirmed Ukraine’s foreign currency credit rating at ‘RD’ (Restricted Default) and its local currency rating at ‘CCC+’. 

The reasoning behind this rating is the ongoing debt restructuring and heightened fiscal pressures from the war. 

Despite the government’s controversial wartime tax hikes, including raising the personal income tax from 1.5% to 5%, Fitch projects budget deficits to remain high—around 20% of GDP in 2024 and 2025—as defense spending continues to dominate expenditures.

These deficits are partially offset by foreign aid and domestic borrowing.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has disbursed $9.8 billion under its current program, with another $1.1 billion approved in late 2024. 

Yet, Fitch warns that declining foreign grants and uncertainties surrounding US aid under President-elect Donald Trump could destabilize public finances further.

Labor shortages and economic participation

Male mobilization for military service has left many businesses understaffed.

Companies have been reporting difficulties planning for exports due to an uncertain workforce. 

Women have stepped into roles traditionally held by men, becoming the majority workforce in sectors like healthcare, agriculture, and education.

Female entrepreneurs have also launched small-scale businesses, supported by microloan programs and international initiatives.

The long-term impact of labor shortages on productivity and economic recovery remains a concern for Ukraine’s outlook.

The role of foreign aid

International aid has been the backbone of Ukraine’s wartime economy. Western allies, led by the United States and the European Union, have provided over $300 billion in aid since 2022.

Beyond military assistance, funds like the $2 billion IFC Economic Resilience Action program and the G7’s $50 billion loan have targeted agriculture, finance, and telecommunications.

However, the future of US aid under President-elect Trump is uncertain. European partners and international financial institutions may need to step up if US support wanes.

The G7’s commitment to using interest from frozen Russian assets to back loans signals a long-term focus on Ukraine’s recovery.

Reconstruction: a $500 billion question

Rebuilding Ukraine will require an estimated $500 billion over the next decade. Infrastructure, renewable energy, and IT are key priorities.

Roads, bridges, and housing in conflict-affected areas need urgent repairs. 

Expanding renewable energy could reduce dependence on fossil fuels and improve energy resilience.

Building on the success of the IT sector could position Ukraine as a leader in digital innovation.

Deeper integration with the European Union could unlock new opportunities for trade and investment.

Recent EU accession talks signal progress toward aligning Ukraine’s economy with European standards, paving the way for institutional modernization.

Rebuilding Ukraine is not just about restoring what was lost—it’s an opportunity to reimagine the country as a modern, dynamic, and inclusive economy integrated into Europe’s future.

The post The road to recovery: how Ukraine plans to rebuild its economy appeared first on Invezz