Author

admin

Browsing

Nike Inc (NYSE: NKE) has had a turbulent 2024 but the coming year is unlikely to be particularly kind to the world’s largest sportswear brand either, according to Wall Street analysts.

Shares of the footwear and apparel company are on track to closing this year with a more than 25% decline due to a series of strategic errors.

Nike promoted Elliot Hill – an industry veteran to the role of its chief executive, tasked with orchestrating a turnaround in October.

But experts remain convinced that it will take more than a year for the company to meaningfully recover.   

How long will it take for Nike to return to growth?

Nike recorded better-than-expected results for its second financial quarter last week that marked the start of its long overdue turnaround, as per Stacey Widlitz of SW Retail Advisors.

Stacey continues to see Nike as a quality name and expects the company to return to growth once it reinvigorates focus on innovation.

“But it’s going to be a long-term, painful process,” she added in a recent interview.

A big mistake that Nike made was trimming its alliance with wholesale partners, including Dick’s Sporting Goods and Foot Locker, in a bid to boost its direct-to-consumer sales, according to Widlitz.

“When you pull back from that channel and withhold some of your best and newest product, someone else comes in and fills those shelves” – and that someone in this case proved to be Hoka and On Running, she argued.

Nike’s store and online sales were down 13% on a year-over-year basis in Q2.

Nike CEO is fully committed to a turnaround

CEO Elliot Hill has already committed to building back trust with the wholesale partners.

“We’ll actively support mutually profitable sell-through. Simply put, we’ll win when our partners win,” he said on the company’s latest earnings call.

He has also disclosed plans of strengthening focus on innovation and sports – a lack of which has meaningfully contributed to Nike losing its mojo, according to experts.

But again, analysts are not entirely convinced that his turnaround plan will help Nike stock fully recover by the end of 2025.

Is Nike stock worth buying for 2025?

Following the earnings call last week, Telsey Advisory downgraded Nike shares to market perform.

Its analysts expect the potential turnaround to “take longer to execute, require greater investments in brand marketing, and result in lower sales and profitability over the next 12 months.”

They now find NKE as fairly valued at about $80 – only slightly above its current price of $77.

Nonetheless, Nike stock pays a dividend yield of 2.09% at writing.

So, its investors do have at least some incentive to wait for the new management to make good on its promise of a significant turnaround.

The post Is Nike stock positioned for a blockbuster 2025? appeared first on Invezz

Every year, as the holiday season rolls around, families gather to watch cherished Christmas movies – It’s a Wonderful Life, Miracle on 34th Street, Home Alone, and Love Actually.

Yet, one film that consistently divides opinion is Die Hard. The 1988 action-thriller starring Bruce Willis has earned a spot on many festive playlists, but the question lingers – is it truly a Christmas movie?

Die Hard: The unconventional holiday classic

Die Hard tells the story of NYPD officer John McClane (Bruce Willis), who arrives in Los Angeles on Christmas Eve to reconnect with his estranged wife at her company’s holiday party.

The festive atmosphere turns chaotic when a group of terrorists, led by Hans Gruber (Alan Rickman), seizes the building and takes hostages. McClane becomes the unlikely hero, taking on the terrorists to save his wife and other partygoers.

Though the film was released in July 1988 in the United States, many viewers argue that its Christmas Eve setting, holiday references, and festive soundtrack place it firmly within the holiday movie category.

Others, however, dismiss it as a straightforward action film that happens to take place during the holiday season.

Robert Davi’s evolving perspective on Die Hard

One voice that has added weight to the debate is Robert Davi, who played FBI agent Big Johnson in the film. Initially skeptical about the film’s holiday credentials, Davi has since reconsidered his stance.

In an interview with The Mirror, Davi admitted, “When I first was doing it, I didn’t think it was a Christmas movie in 1988. But it absolutely has been. It’s set during Christmas. It’s become a Christmas film – many people’s favorite Christmas film.”

Davi pointed to the film’s re-release in theaters during the Christmas season as evidence of its enduring association with the holidays.

Cultural impact and festive re-evaluation

Despite its action-heavy narrative, Die Hard features numerous holiday elements that fans highlight to support its status as a Christmas movie.

The soundtrack includes seasonal songs like “Let It Snow! Let It Snow! Let It Snow!” and “Christmas in Hollis” by Run-D.M.C.

Christmas trees, decorations, and dialogue referencing the holiday season appear throughout the film.

One iconic moment that solidified Die Hard’s Christmas status for fans is McClane’s use of festive tape to secure a gun to his back, culminating in his famous line:

Now I have a machine gun. Ho-ho-ho.

Director and star offer differing views

The film’s director, John McTiernan, has also weighed in on the debate.

Speaking to the American Film Institute (AFI) in 2020, McTiernan revealed that although the film wasn’t initially intended as a Christmas movie, its reception transformed it into one.

“The joy that came from it is what turned it into a Christmas movie,” McTiernan said, suggesting that the audience’s perception plays a vital role in defining the film’s identity.

Bruce Willis, however, remains steadfast in his belief that Die Hard should not be classified as a Christmas movie.

During Comedy Central’s 2018 Roast of Bruce Willis, the actor declared, “Die Hard is not a Christmas movie. It’s a goddamn Bruce Willis movie.”

Audience interpretation and the subjective nature of genre

The Die Hard debate underscores the subjective nature of genre classification.

For many viewers, a Christmas movie is any film that evokes a holiday spirit or is watched as part of annual holiday traditions.

By this definition, Die Hard qualifies based on its Christmas setting and recurring holiday themes.

Others argue that Christmas movies must centre around themes of family, love, redemption, and the magic of the season.

Films like A Christmas Carol and Elf embody these qualities, whereas Die Hard leans more heavily into suspense, violence, and action.

What makes a Christmas movie?

The broader debate over Die Hard reflects larger questions about how movies are categorised.

Genre labels often blur, with many films transcending their initial classifications.

For instance, The Nightmare Before Christmas straddles the line between Halloween and Christmas, while Gremlins similarly blends horror and holiday cheer.

Critics of rigid genre definitions argue that audience experience should be the primary factor in determining a film’s identity.

For some, Die Hard embodies the holiday spirit through its narrative of perseverance, reconciliation, and unexpected heroism.

The role of tradition in shaping perception

For many families, Die Hard has become an annual Christmas Eve tradition.

Much like The Lord of the Rings or Harry Potter marathons during the holiday season, the association is less about thematic content and more about shared experiences and rituals.

Social media fuels this tradition, with fans posting memes, quotes, and watch party announcements each December.

Die Hard merchandise, including advent calendars and Christmas ornaments featuring Hans Gruber’s infamous fall from Nakatomi Plaza, reinforces its place in holiday pop culture.

The case against Die Hard as a Christmas movie

Despite strong arguments in favour of Die Hard’s Christmas credentials, detractors emphasise the film’s core identity as an action movie.

They point out that while the story unfolds during Christmas, the holiday setting is incidental rather than integral to the plot.

Film purists contend that Die Hard lacks the emotional warmth and moral lessons typically associated with holiday classics.

Unlike It’s a Wonderful Life, which focuses on community, empathy, and second chances, Die Hard centers on shootouts and explosions.

A debate with no clear resolution

As Die Hard approaches its 36th anniversary, the debate over its status as a Christmas movie shows no signs of fading.

Whether viewed as a holiday classic or simply an adrenaline-fueled action flick, the film’s enduring popularity speaks for itself.

Ultimately, the answer may lie in the eye of the beholder.

For those who cherish Die Hard as part of their holiday traditions, it will always be a Christmas movie – and for those who disagree, the season offers no shortage of alternatives.

The post Is Die Hard a Christmas movie? The debate continues decades later appeared first on Invezz

Apple (AAPL) has taken a significant step in the ongoing antitrust saga surrounding Google’s search engine dominance, requesting to participate in the upcoming US trial.

This move underscores the iPhone maker’s concern about its revenue-sharing agreements with Google, which generate billions of dollars annually by making Google the default search engine on Apple’s Safari browser.

Protecting billions: Apple’s strategic move amidst antitrust scrutiny

Apple’s decision to intervene in the trial highlights the company’s reliance on its current arrangement with Google, which resulted in an estimated $20 billion in revenue for Apple in 2022 alone.

In court papers filed in Washington on Monday, Apple’s lawyers asserted that they cannot rely solely on Google to defend these agreements, given the Department of Justice’s efforts to potentially break up Google’s business units.

These agreements have come under intense scrutiny as the Department of Justice (DOJ) seeks to demonstrate how Google’s dominance is potentially anticompetitive.

Apple’s focus remains on partnerships

Despite the high stakes, Apple’s legal team clarified that the company has no plans to develop its own search engine to compete with Google, regardless of the outcome of the trial, or the future of these payments, as per a Reuters report.

Rather, Apple’s intervention appears designed to safeguard the current revenue-sharing model, which is a key source of income for the company, and its role in the digital ecosystem.

Antitrust trial: a landmark case with broad implications

The upcoming trial represents a landmark case that has the potential to reshape how users access information online.

Apple’s intervention is a strategic one, demonstrating that it wants to have a say in any potential outcome that might impact its operations.

Prosecutors will aim to prove that Google must take certain measures to promote competition, potentially including the sale of its Chrome web browser and possibly its Android operating system.

By participating in the trial, Apple seeks to ensure its perspective is also heard, and that its financial interests are properly protected.

Google’s response

Google has already proposed to make changes to its default agreements with browser developers, mobile-device manufacturers, and wireless carriers.

However, the company has emphasized that they will not end their revenue-sharing agreements with these partners.

A spokesperson for Google declined to comment on Tuesday.

This indicates that Google intends to continue operating with a business model that ensures they maintain a dominant position in the search engine market.

The post Protecting the status quo? Apple joins DOJ’s case against Google over search dominance appeared first on Invezz

Markets across Asia were closed for the Christmas holiday.

Australia, Hong Kong, India, and so on have scheduled trading holidays for Wednesday.

However, markets in Japan, China, and Taiwan were open.

Japan’s Nikkei 225 saw a slight decline during the trading session, reflecting muted investor sentiment.

Konami, Rakuten, and Fuji Electric suffered the steepest decline on the Nikkei, with shares falling over 2%.

Giants like Suzuki and Yamaha also saw dips, adding to the overall market weakness.

On the flip side, Nissan Motor surged ahead with an over 8% gain.

Toyota and Nippon Steel were also in the green.

Taiwan’s Weighted Index gained 0.62%, signaling positive momentum in that market.

Meanwhile, China’s Shanghai Composite Index traded in the red.

The CSI 300 index was also in the red on Wednesday.

Globally, trading volumes remained thin as several markets were closed for the festive season, leading to subdued investor activity.

Wall Street sees signs of Santa rally

US stocks rallied sharply in a truncated Christmas Eve session, continuing their upward momentum for a third straight session.

The major indices closed at their session highs, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average rising 390.08 points, or 0.9% to 43,297.03.

The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite surged 266.24 points, or 1.4%, to 20,031.13, while the S&P 500 gained 65.97 points, or 1.1%, to end at 6,040.04.

The rally was driven by bargain hunting following last week’s sell-off, which had pushed the Dow and S&P 500 to one-month lows.

Optimism about the broader market outlook, despite the Federal Reserve signaling fewer rate cuts than previously anticipated in 2025, also fueled the gains.

Below-average trading volumes likely exaggerated the upward moves, as many traders stayed away from their desks ahead of the Christmas holiday.

Markets also closed earlier than usual, further limiting participation.

A quiet economic calendar contributed to the light trading day, with key data such as durable goods orders and new home sales released earlier in the week after an executive order from President Joe Biden closed federal offices for Christmas Eve.

The New York Stock Exchange closed early at 1 pm ET on Christmas Eve, while the bond market followed suit at 2 pm.

Both markets will remain closed on Wednesday in observance of Christmas Day.

The S&P 500 turned positive for the month, posting a modest 0.1% gain following this week’s advances.

The Nasdaq has led the charge in December, rallying 4.2%.

Notable contributors include Alphabet, which is up 16%, Apple with a nearly 9% gain, and Tesla, which has surged approximately 34% month-to-date.

Meanwhile, the Dow Jones Industrial Average lags behind, down 3.6% in December, on track for its worst monthly performance since April.

The post Nikkei, CSI 300 in red on Wednesday as other markets pause for Christmas appeared first on Invezz

India’s defence stocks have had an interesting year.

After a great start to the year leading up to India’s budget presentation, many stocks saw great resistance in the second half of 2024.

However, Phillip Capital analysts in the latest research highlighted the defence sector as a compelling investment theme driven by multiple growth levers and long-term execution visibility.

They emphasised factors such as robust order books, localization, government support, and favourable policies as key enablers for the sector’s growth.

The brokerage firm remains positive on defence stocks with a favorable risk-reward profile, including Bharat Electronics, Hindustan Aeronautics, and Data Patterns.

Phillip Capital analysts underscored the sector’s resilience, stating that core defence product margins are expected to expand due to operational efficiencies and indigenization efforts.

The brokerage firm said that India’s growing defence exports, which surged by 46% between FY17 and FY24, reaching ₹211 billion in FY24, with a target of ₹300 billion by FY25.

However, they flagged continued dependency on imports, which accounts for approximately 35% of India’s defence procurements. This dependency, the analysts argued, underscores a significant opportunity for import substitution.

Indian defence stocks to watch

Bharat Electronics
Target Price: ₹390
Rating: Buy

The target reflects an around 33% upside from the stock’s last closing price.

The analysts emphasised BHE’s dominance in the defence electronics segment, with a 60% market share.

Its ₹759 billion order backlog and ₹800 billion pipeline provide strong revenue visibility.

Over FY24-27, the brokerage estimates revenue, EBITDA, and PAT CAGRs at 18%, 20%, and 20%, respectively.

Hindustan Aeronautics
Target Price: ₹5,500
Rating: Buy

The target reflects an around 30% upside from the stock’s last closing price.

Phillip Capital analysts highlighted HAL’s pivotal role in India’s defence modernization, noting catalysts such as the induction of the Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) Mk1A and the GE F414 engine-manufacturing agreement.

Long-term growth prospects include diversification into commercial aircraft MRO in partnership with Airbus.

Revenue, EBITDA, and PAT CAGRs are projected at 18%, 12%, and 12%, respectively, over FY24-27.

Data Patterns
Target Price: ₹3,400
Rating: Buy

The biggest upside is seen in the small-cap stock.

The target indicates an around 36% upside from the stock’s last closing price.

The brokerage noted DP’s vertical integration and expertise in defence electronics, particularly in radars and sub-systems.

While earnings growth is expected to moderate to 26% over FY24-27 from 48% during FY21-24, the analysts believe its scalability and innovation justify premium valuations.

Solar Industries
Target Price: ₹12,000
Rating: Neutral

The target indicates an around 18% upside from the stock’s last closing price.

Phillip Capital analysts highlighted SOIL’s dominance in industrial explosives and diversification into integrated weapon systems.

Despite robust domestic and global demand, the analysts maintained a Neutral stance due to valuation concerns.

Revenue, EBITDA, and PAT CAGRs were forecasted at 26%, 31%, and 30%, respectively, over FY24-27.

Bharat Dynamics
Target Price: ₹1,400
Rating: Neutral

The target reflects an around 15% upside from the stock’s last closing price.

The analysts pointed to BDL’s leadership in missile manufacturing, supported by a robust ₹194 billion order book and significant opportunities worth ₹300 billion in the next 3-5 years.

However, they believe current valuations largely reflect these positives.

The post Indian defence stocks HAL, BEL, BDL could climp up to 36%: here’s why appeared first on Invezz

Tilray Inc (NASDAQ: TLRY) chief executive Irwin Simon expects the recreational use of cannabis to be legalised on a federal level under Donald Trump as the President of the United States.

In other words, he expects legalisation to occur over the next four years.

Simon made that prediction in a recent interview with Fox Business.

But even if the President-elect moves in that direction, there’s reason to believe that Tilray stock may continue to struggle.

Let’s explore why.

Why has Tilray faced challenges in Germany?

The recreational use of cannabis has already been legalised in two major markets: Germany and Canada – but both of them still have strict regulations in place.

In Germany, for example, it remains illegal to set up a cannabis store.

So, if you want it, you’ll have to either grow it by yourself or join a licensed club that is prohibited from accepting more than 500 members.

And it’s not like there’s a ton of these clubs spread all over Germany. Plus, the clubs are quite choosy in picking their members as well.

So, yes, Germany has legalised the recreational use of cannabis – but the supply within the country remains rather restricted.

That’s why Tilray hasn’t been immensely successful in Germany, and why the disappointment may replicate even if the US legalises cannabis on federal level.

Why has TLRY faced challenges in Canada?

Competition has been a major hurdle for Tilray in Canada ever since the country legalised the recreational use of cannabis in 2018.

If the US follows suit, a number of other players may join the race, potentially leaving Tilray scrambling for market share.

Plus, strong local competitors with established relationships and supply chains could keep things challenging for TLRY.  

Finally, the possibility that at least some of its potential customers will continue to tap on illegal channels to acquire cannabis to bypass regulations can’t entirely be ruled out either.

So, federal legalisation of cannabis in the United States would sure be a meaningful event for Tilray stock. But the challenges it has been facing all along could present in the US as well – limiting its upside potential in 2025.

Tilray stock is down more than 50% versus its year-to-date high at writing.

Is it worth investing in Tilray stock?

Tilray’s financials have been rather inconsistent in recent years.

And if federal legalisation is what it needs to change that, then TLRY remains a speculative investment at best since it’s only a prediction for now that Trump 2.0 will prove to be a tailwind for the cannabis market.

The incoming government itself has not indicated any such plans so far.

That’s part of the reason why Wall Street analysts currently have a consensus “hold” rating on Tilray stock that does not pay a dividend either at writing.

The post Tilray stock faces challenges despite potential Trump 2.0 cannabis legalization appeared first on Invezz

President Joe Biden faces a critical decision on Nippon Steel’s $15 billion bid to acquire US Steel, a deal that has raised concerns over national security.

The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) referred the matter to the President after failing to reach a consensus, Reuters reported.

President Biden has 15 days to block the transaction, which has faced opposition from both him and former President Donald Trump.

Will the Nippon Steel-US Steel deal go through?

The potential merger has been under intense scrutiny due to its implications for US economic and national security.

If Biden takes no action within the given timeframe, the deal will proceed, offering an unexpected green light to the Japanese steel giant.

However, the President has previously expressed reservations about the tie-up, aligning with Trump’s stance, who also opposed the merger before his term ended.

CFIUS, responsible for assessing foreign investments for national security risks, escalated the review to Biden after thorough deliberation.

“We received the CFIUS evaluation, and the President will review it,” said White House spokeswoman Saloni Sharma.

Both Nippon Steel and US Steel confirmed they were informed of the referral on Tuesday, adding to the uncertainty surrounding the deal’s future.

Nippon Steel has urged Biden to consider the measures it has taken to address security concerns.

“We have made significant commitments to grow US Steel and ensure national security is safeguarded,” the company stated.

US Steel echoed the sentiment, emphasizing that the deal enhances both US economic and national security.

Should the deal collapse, Nippon Steel faces a hefty $565 million penalty to US Steel.

The company has also indicated that it may pursue legal action against the US government if the merger is blocked.

The acquisition is pivotal to Nippon Steel’s expansion strategy, which aims to increase its global steel production capacity from 65 million metric tons to 85 million tons annually.

The company views the merger as a cornerstone to achieving its long-term goal of surpassing 100 million tons of production.

The stakes are high as Biden weighs the potential economic benefits against national security risks.

The outcome will have far-reaching implications for the global steel industry and US-Japan trade relations.

A decision is expected within the next two weeks, keeping markets and stakeholders on edge.

The post Biden to decide fate of Nippon Steel’s $15 billion bid for US Steel: here’s what you need to know appeared first on Invezz

Britain’s economy stalled in the third quarter of the year, according to revised official government data released on Monday.

A preliminary estimate for the third quarter released by the ONS last month indicated that UK GDP grew by 0.1% during the period.

However, final data published on Monday revealed flat GDP growth (0%) compared to the previous quarter.

Earlier this month, the ONS reported an unexpected 0.1% contraction in the UK economy for October, marking the second consecutive monthly decline following a similar 0.1% fall in September.

The revision further lags behind economic forecasts, which had anticipated a 0.2% expansion.

The ONS also downgraded its second-quarter growth reading from 0.5% to 0.4%.

The ONS attributed the downgrade to weaker-than-expected performance in key sectors, including bars and restaurants, legal firms, and advertising.

This revision paints a concerning picture of the UK economy, which now appears to be heading for two consecutive quarters of flatlining activity.

The stagnant performance comes amid a slump in business and consumer confidence, driven in part by gloomy rhetoric from the new Labour government and the introduction of £40 billion in tax increases in its autumn budget.

The slowdown comes as the Labour government presented its maiden budget in October, which included business tax increases and plans for higher state borrowing.

The downgrade reflects broader struggles in key sectors and underscores the difficulty of achieving sustained growth in the current economic climate.

Finance Minister Rachel Reeves acknowledged the challenges, stating, “The challenge we face to fix our economy and properly fund our public finances after 15 years of neglect is huge. But this is only fuelling our fire to deliver for working people.”

The third-quarter stagnation has been attributed to a combination of factors, including higher interest rates, weaker overseas demand, and concerns over fiscal policies in the budget.

The revised figures highlight the uphill battle faced by the government in reviving the economy and meeting its fiscal objectives.

Inflation, interest rates and recession

Last week, the Bank of England warned that the UK economy would stagnate in the final quarter of the year.

The Bank of England held its core interest rate steady at 4.75%.

Global geopolitical tensions, domestic fiscal measures outlined in the Autumn Budget, and ongoing trade uncertainties have created a more challenging and complex economic outlook.

While this projection falls short of a technical recession—defined as two consecutive quarters of negative growth—the outlook is grim for a government that has prioritized reviving economic momentum.

The revised figures and the prospect of continued stagnation pose a significant challenge to the Labour government’s economic agenda, particularly after its autumn budget policies aimed at stabilizing public finances.

Data released last week showed that UK inflation rose to an eight-month high in November, increasing to 2.6% from 2.3% in October.

The post UK economy stagnates as revised GDP figures show no growth in Q3 appeared first on Invezz

Brazil’s current account deficit increased to $3.1 billion in November, according to a report from the central bank on Monday.

This data shows a growing deficit over the last year, mostly due to a drop in the country’s trade surplus.

Although the monthly deficit is slightly more than the $3.3 billion expected by economists in a Reuters survey, it is still a significant decrease from the $3 million loss recorded in November of the previous year.

Economic growth drives imports

The rise in Brazil’s current account deficit can be linked to the country’s surprisingly strong economic performance, resulting in an increase in imports and a fall in the trade surplus.

Brazil’s Finance Minister, Fernando Haddad, has estimated an optimistic 3.5% GDP growth this year.

This is significantly greater than the 1.6% prediction provided by private economists at the beginning of the year, indicating a shift in national economic dynamics.

This economic trajectory is expected to have an increasing impact on Brazil’s balance of payments.

The increase in economic activity has resulted in higher net spending on services, contributing to a wider deficit in factor payments.

The combination of these variables has resulted in a greater current account shortfall, indicating a critical crossroads for the Brazilian economy.

Trade surplus declines

In November, Brazil reported a trade surplus of $6.3 billion, a 20.9% decrease from the previous year.

This decline in trade performance reflects the underlying economic shift, as domestic demand for imported commodities increases.

Notably, the deficit in services jumped by 24.6% to $4.7 billion, while the deficit in factor payments, which includes money given to foreign investors and banks, rose by 13.8% to $5 billion.

Together, these numbers depict a difficult climate for Brazil as it seeks to balance its foreign transactions.

Foreign direct investment remains strong

Despite concerns about the current account deficit, foreign direct investment (FDI) in Brazil remains strong.

In November, the country attracted $7 billion in FDI, more than the $6.5 billion expected by a Reuters survey.

Over the last twelve months, FDI has accounted for 3.0% of Brazil’s GDP, indicating international investor confidence in the country’s economic prognosis.

This inflow of money is critical because it helps to balance the current account deficit and promotes future growth and infrastructure development.

Future outlook and challenges ahead

The current economic situation in Brazil provides a contradictory narrative: while the economy is displaying signs of resilience and development, the rising current account deficit raises serious concerns about sustainability.

Policymakers will need to handle the complexities of trade balances, notably in regulating import demand and increasing export capacity.

Furthermore, the government’s strategy will be critical in maintaining economic development while retaining foreign investors.

As Brazil’s economy evolves, its ability to manage growing deficits while maintaining investor confidence will be critical to attaining long-term economic stability.

In conclusion, while Brazil’s November current account deficit of $3.1 billion highlights the country’s mounting economic complexity, the government remains confident.

The problems created by the deficit, notably in trade balances and service payments, will necessitate careful management and strategic planning as Brazil strives for long-term growth in an increasingly competitive global environment.

The post Brazil’s current account deficit hits $3.1 billion in November amid economic optimism appeared first on Invezz

On Sunday, US President-elect Donald Trump wrote on social media website Truth Social,

“For purposes of National Security and Freedom throughout the World, the United States of America feels that the ownership and control of Greenland is an absolute necessity.”

Trump’s renewed interest in acquiring Greenland underscores the island’s geopolitical and economic significance.

As the world’s largest island, Greenland is rich in resources like gold, silver, copper, uranium, and untapped oil reserves.

Its strategic location near the Arctic provides access to shipping lanes and potential dominance in an increasingly competitive region.

This aligns with Trump’s broader vision of enhancing US national security and energy independence, which he highlighted while announcing his choice of Ken Howery as the new US ambassador to Denmark.

Greenland’s autonomy, while under Denmark’s sovereignty, complicates any purchase attempts.

The island operates with self-rule, managing domestic affairs such as education, healthcare, and resource management, while Denmark oversees defence and foreign relations.

The Arctic’s prominence in global politics has grown as nations vie for control, with Russia already pushing territorial claims close to Greenland.

Trump’s proposed acquisition would assert US influence over these contested waters.

Trump and Greenland: not the first time

Trump’s interest in Greenland is not a new development, as the President-elect had previously expressed a desire to control the territory during his first term from 2017 to 2021.

In 2019, Trump voiced his intention to purchase Greenland, citing the country’s natural resources and strategic geopolitical position as key attractions.

However, his proposal faced strong opposition from Danish leaders, with then Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen asserting that “Greenland was not for sale.”

In retaliation, Trump canceled a scheduled meeting with Frederiksen in Denmark due to her comments regarding the proposed Greenland deal.

US interest in Greenland spans decades

The US has a history of pursuing Greenland. In 1946, President Harry Truman offered Denmark $100 million for the territory.

Interest dates back even further to 1867, illustrating a consistent view of Greenland as a valuable asset.

Historically, the US has made significant land acquisitions, including Alaska from Russia and the Louisiana Territory from France.

These purchases not only expanded US territory but also boosted its strategic and economic standing.

Trump’s ambitions for Greenland mirror these historical deals, but modern complexities—such as climate change, Arctic politics, and Greenlandic autonomy—pose challenges.

The island’s home-rule government has resisted such overtures, backed by Denmark’s firm stance against selling.

Greenland’s Prime Minister Múte Bourup Egede remains committed to the island’s sovereignty, making the prospect of a US purchase highly contentious.

A revived strategy for energy and security dominance

Trump’s focus on Greenland isn’t solely about resources; it’s also about reshaping US influence globally.

Control of Greenland could fortify the US position in the Arctic, enabling better oversight of emerging shipping routes as ice melts due to climate change.

These routes could rival traditional ones like the Panama Canal, where Trump recently demanded lower transit fees for US ships, showcasing his broader agenda of securing US interests in critical regions.

The Arctic’s energy potential is another draw. Greenland’s waters are believed to harbour significant oil reserves, which align with Trump’s “America First” energy strategy.

Ownership of these resources would reduce reliance on foreign oil and bolster domestic energy markets.

The post Greenland under US control? Trump’s latest move raises questions appeared first on Invezz