Author

admin

Browsing

Japan’s rice prices are facing their most severe shock in more than half a century, with costs more than doubling over the past year.

The crisis is exposing structural flaws in the agricultural system and fueling voter unrest ahead of key elections.

Data from Japan’s statistics bureau show that rice prices in May soared 101.7% year-on-year, the sharpest annual rise in over 50 years.

The jump follows a 98.4% increase in April and a 92.1% spike in March, reflecting a steady deterioration in supply and intensifying demand pressure.

The soaring costs are placing a heavy burden on Japanese households.

According to the Lowy Institute, the average price for a five-kilogram bag of rice rose to ¥4,268 (US$29.90) in May, up from ¥2,228 (US$15.60) a year earlier.

For families consuming 20 kilograms per month, that translates into an additional annual outlay of nearly ¥98,000 (US$687).

This is a daunting figure in a country where over 30% of households earned less than ¥3 million (US$21,032) in 2022.

In recent months, the the government in Japan has tried to release rice from its emergency stockpile to tackle the doubling of prices.

Earlier this month, it said it will release another 200,000 metric tons of rice, but more structural issues seem to be at play here.

Why has rice become so costly in Japan?

Japan’s deepening rice crisis stems from multiple converging factors.

A record-breaking heatwave in 2023 diminished crop yields, and widespread stink bug damage further compromised quality and volume.

Meanwhile, an earthquake warning in August last year triggered panic buying and household stockpiling of rice, compounding scarcity in retail markets.

The situation is further complicated by a global wheat shortage linked to the ongoing Russia–Ukraine war.

With wheat prices surging, many consumers in Japan have turned to rice as a more affordable alternative, inadvertently driving up demand and further fueling the sharp rise in Japan’s rice prices

Simultaneously, fertilizer costs — also impacted by the conflict — have risen over 30% in the past five years, squeezing farmers already operating on narrow margins.

“One is panic buying due to rumours of a mega-earthquake,” Tim Harcourt, chief economist at the University of Technology Sydney told Al Jazeera.

“Two is the shortage of wheat due to the Russia-Ukraine war causing a substitute of wheat for rice. And three, is the revival in tourism to Japan and a booming hospitality sector increasing demand for rice,” he said.

Small-scale farming structure under pressure

Japan’s rice production model has long relied on small-scale farmers.

As of 2024, nearly two-thirds of rice farmers cultivate less than one hectare of land, according to agricultural census data.

Yet large-scale farmers are needed to sustain production.

In 2020, for example, 16% of rice farmers cultivated more than three hectares, accounting for 70% of the total cultivated area.

Efforts to expand farmland consolidation have had limited success.

Between 2010 and 2020, the number of farmers cultivating over 15 hectares grew by 83%, from 6,654 to 12,194.

But experts say this remains insufficient to secure stable long-term supply.

The Mitsubishi Research Institute has urged a policy overhaul.

“Scaling up of rice farmers through farmland accumulation has begun to reach its limits,” the institute noted, adding that creating sustainable economic incentives for rice farming is essential amid growing climate volatility.

Broader inflation woes compound the crisis

Japan’s broader inflationary pressures are compounding the crisis.

The country’s core inflation rate — which excludes fresh food — climbed to 3.7% in May, its highest since January 2023 and above economists’ expectations.

Despite Japan’s long-standing policy of shielding its rice market with high import tariffs, the spike in domestic prices has forced some consumers and restaurants to turn to imported rice.

This shift, while gradual, has raised concerns about the country’s food self-sufficiency and the long-term viability of its protected agricultural market.

Will the rice crisis become a political crisis for Ishiba?

For Ishiba’s government, the crisis could not have come at a worse time.

A parliamentary upper house election is due next month, and public support for his administration has already sunk to its lowest level since he took office in October.

The surge in food costs — especially for something as symbolically and culturally significant as rice — risks eroding voter trust.

“We don’t know why we haven’t been able to push prices lower,” Ishiba told parliament in May.

“We first will figure out exactly how much rice there is and where it is.”

Grassroots pressure is building. Advocacy groups like Save the Children Japan have reported that nearly a third of low-income families surveyed are reducing rice consumption due to affordability issues.

“Rice is the cherished staple in Japan, so an economic crisis automatically becomes a political one,” Harcourt said.

Uncertain path

While policymakers have acknowledged the seriousness of the issue, clear solutions remain elusive.

Market interventions to stabilize prices would need to be paired with long-term reforms in agricultural structure, climate adaptation, and production incentives.

In the meantime, households are cutting back, restaurants are adapting menus, and imports are quietly rising — all signs of a fundamental shift in how Japan may approach its most essential food in the years ahead.

If left unaddressed, the “rice crisis” may become not just an economic and agricultural challenge, but a defining political issue in the months to come.

The post Japan’s rice price surge: what’s driving it and why it could spark a political crisis appeared first on Invezz

Bank of America Global Research boosted its year-end projection for the STOXX 600 index to 530 from 500 on Friday, citing sustained resilience in global GDP following a recent truce in US-China trade talks.

The pan-European benchmark, which closed Thursday at 535.86, is still around all-time highs, indicating market optimism amid persistent geopolitical uncertainties.

According to the Wall Street Company, positive factors such as the trade truce and lower-than-expected US inflation data in May have boosted the global mood.

These factors have helped to stabilize financial markets that have been shaken by months of high uncertainty.

Nonetheless, BofA retains a cautious attitude on European equities generally, retaining a “negative” outlook on the region’s stock market.

“The main reason for the resilience is that these events (Israel-Iran conflict, trade war) have not yet translated into a clear-cut weakening of global growth,” the brokerage stated in its research note.

Despite the higher aim, the new projection suggests a tiny 1.1% decline from the index’s previous closing.

The revision reflects the brokerage’s understanding of short-term resilience, but it remains cautious owing to ongoing macroeconomic uncertainties.

Resilience amid geopolitical strain

In the face of escalating geopolitical friction, from the trade war to the Israel/Iran tensions, European equities have generally shrugged off the impact.

According to BofA, these concerns threaten global stability, but they suggested that so far, they have not yet meaningfully diminished growth momentum.

But the brokerage cautioned that the risks are not close to over.

Despite the benefit of lessening trade tensions and improving inflation numbers, obstacles like as continuing tariff pressures and the possible consequences of Middle East turmoil remain.

BofA warned that these changes could have an impact on global economic growth in the second half of the year.

Sector calls: mining up, airlines down

BofA upgraded European mining stocks to “overweight” from “market weight” in a change of sector strategy.

The brokerage cited compelling valuations after the group had underperformed for a long.

Also, a supportive factor was a weaker US dollar, which is generally positive for commodity prices and exporters.

On the other hand, airlines were lowered to “underweight” from “market weight.”

According to BofA, it sees the sector as being at risk of higher oil prices, particularly if the situation in the Middle East spirals even further out of control.

In an already turbulent operating environment for carriers, higher energy costs could tighten margins and reduce demand.

STOXX 600 outlook is mixed

The STOXX 600’s impressive performance this year has occurred against a backdrop of mixed economic indicators. While certain sectors of the global economy are resilient, others remain vulnerable.

BofA’s revised projection seeks to reconcile these dynamics by recognizing short-term strength while being cautious about structural and geopolitical risks.

In summary, the brokerage’s higher year-end prediction for the STOXX 600 indicates increased near-term optimism but does not represent a significant shift in mood.

Investors are being cautioned against complacency as the index approaches record highs.

Risks associated with trade policies and geopolitical turmoil remain significant concerns that may impact market direction in the months ahead.

The post BofA raises STOXX 600 target amid resilient global growth, warns on Mideast risks appeared first on Invezz

Palantir co-founder and renowned defense investor Joe Lonsdale weighed in on escalating tensions between Israel and Iran in a CNBC interview on Friday.

According to Lonsdale, Tehran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons demands decisive US action, regardless of political hesitation or past intervention fatigue.

Lonsdale refrained from speculating on intentions, referring to President Trump’s recent remarks that the United States could launch a military action in Iran within the next two weeks.

However, he emphasized the severity of the threat, saying, “If people chant death to America for years, kill American soldiers, and then try to build a nuke, you should make it clear they can’t have a nuke.”

Palantir’s co-founder dismissed the idea that the entire population of Iran (92 million people) supports the regime’s ambitions, pointing instead to the country’s rich history and its people’s natural alignment with Western values.

“The Personal people, the Kurds – these are modern, intelligent communities who have suffered under a theocratic regime,” Lonsdale told CNBC this morning, adding, “Iran could be a prosperous republic if not run by crazy people”.

Palantir co-founder urges military action against Iran

Joe Lonsdale expressed confidence in America’s so-called bunker-buster bombs in the CNBC interview on Friday.

“I’m told they work – there’s no reason they shouldn’t be able to do it – and you can always hit things multiple times just to be sure,” he noted.

Lonsdale backed the idea of a preemptive strike to eliminate nuclear infrastructure but clarified that he respects the administration’s stated goal of stopping nuclear proliferation without necessarily pursuing regime change.

That said, Palantir’s co-founder acknowledged that toppling Iran’s regime could unlock long-term stability in the region.

You take out the mullahs, you remove an entire axis of terror – Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis – all funded and fuelled by this regime. The Abraham Accords could flourish, and peace becomes more viable, he said.

Lonsdale criticizes ‘woke right’ for view on Iran

Joe Lonsdale was unsparing in his criticism of past Democratic administrations as well as factions within the current Republican government.

He rebuked President Obama for avoiding the term “Islamic extremism”, accusing him of playing balance-of-power politics that allowed radicals to thrive.

At the same time, he slammed elements of what he called the “new woke right” – including figures like Steve Bannon and Tucker Carlson – for opposing action against Iran due to war fatigue.

Being against more boots on the ground doesn’t mean you allow maniacs to get nukes – it’s childish stubbornness, being so angry about Iraq that they can’t see this is different.

Palantir’s co-founder also pointed to misinformation campaigns, alleging many anti-interventionist voices online are fake accounts from Islamist networks masquerading as conservatives.

The rising geopolitical tensions, particularly in the Middle East, are helping PLTR shares remain at record levels of about $140.

The post Palantir co-founder: US must prevent Iranian nukes appeared first on Invezz

On Friday, Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller indicated that he anticipates tariffs will not substantially increase inflation.

Therefore, he believes policymakers should consider reducing interest rates as soon as next month.

In a CNBC interview, the central banker said he and his colleagues should begin gradually easing monetary policy, noting that inflation is not currently—and is unlikely to become—a significant threat to the economy.

Rate cut probability in July

“I think we’re in the position that we could do this as early as July,” Waller said during the interview. 

That would be my view, whether the committee would go along with it or not.

Two days prior, the Federal Open Market Committee opted to maintain its key interest rate, marking the fourth consecutive hold since the last reduction in December.

During his first term in office, US President Donald Trump appointed Waller as a governor. 

Trump has consistently exerted pressure on the Federal Reserve to decrease interest rates. 

His rationale for this push is to alleviate the borrowing costs associated with the substantial national debt, which currently stands at $36 trillion.

This ongoing pressure reflects a broader economic strategy aimed at stimulating growth and reducing the financial burden on the government.

Labour market concern

Waller believes the Fed should implement cuts to preempt a potential deceleration in the labor market.

“If you’re starting to worry about the downside risk [to the] labor market, move now, don’t wait,” he said. 

Why do we want to wait until we actually see a crash before we start cutting rates?

So I’m all in favor of saying maybe we should start thinking about cutting the policy rate at the next meeting, because we don’t want to wait till the job market tanks before we start cutting the policy rate.

Gains were observed in stock market futures following Waller’s remarks.

It remains uncertain if Waller can garner significant support for his stance.

At this week’s meeting, the FOMC, with Waller’s vote, decided to maintain the benchmark federal funds rate within its target range of 4.25%-4.5%.

Policymakers are uncertain about the future direction of interest rates, as evidenced by the “dot plot” of individual officials’ expectations. 

While the median outlook suggests two rate cuts this year, the dispersion of views is notable.

Seven of the 19 meeting participants anticipate rates remaining steady, two foresee only one cut, and the remaining ten expect two or three reductions.

A cautious approach is likely by the Fed

During remarks made on Wednesday before the Fed meeting, Trump called Fed Chair Jerome Powell “stupid” for not pushing to cut, advocating for significant changes. 

He believes the benchmark rate should be at least 2 percentage points lower, and even suggested it should be 2.5 percentage points below the current level of 4.33%.

Waller, a potential successor to Powell—whose term as chair concludes in May 2026—advocated for a cautious approach by the committee. Meanwhile, Trump has indicated an imminent announcement regarding his intentions.

“You’d want to start slow and bring them down, just to make sure that there’s no big surprises. But start the process. That’s the key thing,” Waller said. 

We’ve been on pause for six months to wait and see, and so far, the data has been fine…I don’t think we need to wait much longer, because even if the tariffs come in later, the impacts are still the same. It should be a one-off level effect and not cause persistent inflation.

Apprehensions

Other officials have been hesitant to implement cuts, preferring to observe the long-term effects of Trump’s tariffs on inflation, the labor market, and overall economic growth.

“We’ve been on pause for six months, thinking that there was going to be a big tariff shock to inflation. We haven’t seen it. We follow the data,” Waller said. 

I’ve been arguing since a year ago that central banks should be looking through this.

At his post-meeting news conference on Wednesday, Powell reiterated his belief that the Fed can maintain its wait-and-see approach as the labor market remains strong. 

Recent inflation data indicates minimal pass-through, as companies deplete inventory accumulated before the tariff announcement, amidst concerns of slowing consumer demand and reduced pricing power.

According to the CME Group’s FedWatch measure, the futures market pricing suggests almost no possibility of a rate cut at the July 29-30 meeting. Instead, the next rate adjustment is anticipated in September.

The post Fed governor Waller advocates for July rate cut amid tariff, labor market outlook appeared first on Invezz

The USD/TRY exchange rate continued its strong rally after the latest Federal Reserve and Turkish central bank interest rate decisions. The pair was trading at 39.68 on Friday, a few points below the year-to-date high of 40.02. This price is about 12% above its lowest point in January. 

Federal Reserve interest decision

The USD/TRY exchange rate rallied strongly this year as the Federal Reserve made its interest rate decision. The bank left interest rates unchanged between 4.25% and 4.50%, and expressed concerns about the economy because of Donald Trump’s tariffs. 

Officials hinted that the bank will cut interest rates two times this year and four times in the next two years. This decision was in line with expectations and was fairly hawkish. 

The decision also attracted criticism from Donald Trump, who has asked the Fed to cut interest rates. In a statement on Thursday, he blasted Jerome Powell, accusing him of costing the US hundreds of billions of dollars in interest payments. He pointed out that Europe has had 10 interest rate cuts since last year (the number is 8). 

The Fed expects that inflation will continue rising this year as companies adjust to Trump’s tariffs. Trump has added a baseline 10% tariff on all imports and more others on steel and aluminum. 

Turkish Central Bank decision

The USD/TRY exchange rate also held steady after the Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey (CBRT) delivered its interest rate decision. 

As was widely expected, the bank decided to leave interest rates unchanged at 46%, where they have been in the past few months. It also left the rates corridor between 44.5% and 49%.

The bank left room for cuts as recent data showed that consumer inflation made some modest improvements last month. The numbers revealed that the headline consumer price index (CPI) crashed to 35.4% in May, its lowest level in four years. 

The most leading indicators signal that the country’s inflation continued falling this month. At the same time, it expects the economy to continue doing relatively well this year. In a note, a Bloomberg analyst said:

“We identified a dovish tilt in the central bank’s interpretation of recent inflation and activity related data as a third and final policy outcome from the June meeting. The decision statement advised the central bank will use policy tools “effectively” — marking a change from earlier language suggesting tightening — if the inflation outlook worsens. We read this as indicating the central bank is gearing up for cuts to the policy rate starting in July.”

The main risk is that the region is facing major geopolitical challenges that may lead to higher inflation as crude oil prices surge.

USD/TRY technical analysis

USDTRY chart by TradingView

The daily chart shows that the USD/TRY exchange rate has been in a strong uptrend as the Turkish lira crash continued. It has formed an ascending channel and remained above the 50-day moving average, a sign that the bullish trend will continue.

The risk, however, is that the pair has formed a bearish divergence pattern as the MACD and the Relative Strength Index (RSI) have drifted downwards.

Therefore, the pair will likely have a bearish breakdown, with the next point to watch being at 39. A move above the resistance at 40 will invalidate the bearish view.

The post USD/TRY forecast after the Fed and CBRT interest rate decisions appeared first on Invezz

The PDD Holdings stock price remains in a bear market after falling by over 23% from its highest point since March this year. It was trading at $102.25 on Friday, also down by 37% from the highest level in 2024. This article explores the next PDD share target as Temu sales dive in the US. 

Temu sales have plunged in the US

PDD Holdings, the parent company of Pinduoduo and Temu, is under intense pressure as concerns about tariffs continued. 

The main concerns about the company is that Temu sales have collapsed in the United States, one of its core markets. According to Bloomberg, its weekly US sales have plunged by double digits.

Its sales dropped by over 25% YoY in the week between May 11 and June 8. This decline happened as the company boosted prices after Donald Trump’s tariffs ended the de minimis tax break that allowed small packages to enter the US tax-free. 

Temu’s products were subjected to a tariff of 145% until the US and China reached a deal that brought them to about 10%.

More data by SimilarWeb shows that the share of US traffic to Temu’s website and applications has continued falling recently. The US share crashed by 58% in May, and has now been overtaken by Brazil, France, Mexico, and Germany. 

In addition to tariffs, Temu sales in the US plunged because the company has reduced marketing spending in the US. It has moved from creating thousands to tens of thousands of new adverts per day before tariffs to dozens or single digits. Bloomberg noted that there are days that the company does not advertise. 

Companies like Temu and Shein rely heavily on marketing to gain sales. While most of the traffic to Temu’s website is direct, over 25% of it comes from paid advertising, according to SimilarWeb data. 

Temu has always been risky to PDD as we wrote here. That’s because, historically, companies using its business model have always struggled to thrive in a long time. A good example of this is Wish, a company that boomed a few years ago and then nearly collapsed. ContextLogic sold Wish.com for $173 million last year. 

Read more: PDD stock: Temu growth and lessons from Wish.com

PDD sales are slowing

The most recent results showed that PDD Holdings revenue rose by 10% in the first quarter to $13.18 billion. Its operating profit plunged by 38% to $2.2 billion, while the net income dropped by over 47%.

The management believes that the business slowdown will continue as it scales and external challenges remain. 

Yahoo Finance data shows that analysts anticipate that its second-quarter sales will be CNY 102 billion, up by 5.8% from the same period last year. Third-quarter sales will grow by 6% to 105 billion CNY, while the annual sales will be 428 billion CNY. 

Still, the average PDD stock price forecast among analysts is bullish. The target price is $127, up from the current $102.25. 

PDD stock price analysis

PDD Holdings stock chart | Source: TradingView

The weekly chart shows that the PDD share price has crashed from a high of $164.30 in 2024 to the current $102.25. It has moved below the 50-week Exponential Moving Average (EMA).

PDD stock has formed a symmetrical triangle pattern, with two lines nearing their confluence. The MACD indicator has moved below the zero line. 

Therefore, the stock will likely have a big move in either direction in the coming days. If this happens, the next support and resistance levels at $80 and $125. 

The post Very bad news for PDD Holdings stock price appeared first on Invezz

The long-anticipated Tesla robotaxi project is set to begin a limited rollout in Austin, Texas on 22 June.

The pilot will deploy 10 vehicles equipped with the company’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) software, marking the first time Tesla will offer autonomous rides to select users in a controlled urban environment.

The move aligns with Elon Musk’s earlier confirmation in May about launching the Robotaxi program this month, ahead of broader deployments in Los Angeles and San Francisco.

The first driverless journey is expected to occur on 28 June—Musk’s birthday—with initial operations constrained to a geofenced zone within Austin.

Tesla has opted to use modified Model Y vehicles rather than the CyberCab, which was unveiled in October but has not yet been integrated into this launch phase.

Access to the service will be limited and by invitation only, with a small group of influencers and stakeholders invited to experience early rides.

Tesla targets $2 trillion valuation from autonomous push

Elon Musk has been vocal about his vision for a driverless future since at least 2019 when he projected robotaxi launches by 2020.

That prediction fell short, but Tesla now appears closer than ever to delivering a commercial autonomous service.

Analysts, including Wedbush Securities’ Dan Ives, view the robotaxi debut as pivotal to Tesla’s long-term valuation, suggesting the company could surpass a $2 trillion market cap by the end of 2026.

According to Ives, Tesla’s scale gives it a global advantage in the autonomous sector, with the potential to not only lead in self-driving transport but also license its FSD technology to other automakers.

The company has not yet confirmed if licensing deals are on the horizon, but the Austin launch may serve as a test case for evaluating the reliability and scalability of Tesla’s system.

Safety concerns rise after demonstration test fails

Despite the excitement, public safety concerns are mounting.

Earlier this month, a group known as The Dawn Project, which campaigns for safer tech implementation, conducted a demonstration involving a Tesla Model Y using FSD software.

In the test, the car reportedly failed to stop for a stationary school bus and struck a child-sized mannequin, highlighting concerns over the real-world performance of autonomous features.

The Dawn Project is led by Dan O’Dowd, founder of Green Hills Software, a company that supplies safety technology to Tesla’s competitors.

While some have questioned the motivations behind the campaign, the incident has nonetheless intensified calls for stricter scrutiny.

Tesla’s FSD and FSD Supervised systems have been linked by NHTSA to numerous accidents and fatalities, but debate remains over how much fault lies with the software versus human drivers. 

Investigations have found that driver inattention, combined with system limitations, contributed to these incidents.

Texas lawmakers urge Tesla to delay launch to 1 September

The regulatory environment in Texas presents additional complications.

A group of Democratic lawmakers recently sent a letter to Tesla requesting that the robotaxi launch be postponed until 1 September.

That date coincides with the introduction of a new state law governing autonomous vehicles.

In the letter addressed to Tesla’s field quality director, the lawmakers cited public safety and regulatory compliance as their primary concerns.

They asked the company to provide detailed documentation demonstrating how it plans to adhere to the new legal requirements, should it proceed with the planned launch.

Tesla has not formally responded to the letter, but the company’s track record of pushing forward despite resistance suggests the launch will likely go ahead as planned.

Public protests have already taken place in Austin, and further demonstrations could coincide with the debut of the service on 22 June.

The post Elon Musk confirms Tesla Robotaxi pilot launching in Austin on June 22 appeared first on Invezz

Palantir co-founder and renowned defense investor Joe Lonsdale weighed in on escalating tensions between Israel and Iran in a CNBC interview on Friday.

According to Lonsdale, Tehran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons demands decisive US action, regardless of political hesitation or past intervention fatigue.

Lonsdale refrained from speculating on intentions, referring to President Trump’s recent remarks that the United States could launch a military action in Iran within the next two weeks.

However, he emphasized the severity of the threat, saying, “If people chant death to America for years, kill American soldiers, and then try to build a nuke, you should make it clear they can’t have a nuke.”

Palantir’s co-founder dismissed the idea that the entire population of Iran (92 million people) supports the regime’s ambitions, pointing instead to the country’s rich history and its people’s natural alignment with Western values.

“The Personal people, the Kurds – these are modern, intelligent communities who have suffered under a theocratic regime,” Lonsdale told CNBC this morning, adding, “Iran could be a prosperous republic if not run by crazy people”.

Palantir co-founder urges military action against Iran

Joe Lonsdale expressed confidence in America’s so-called bunker-buster bombs in the CNBC interview on Friday.

“I’m told they work – there’s no reason they shouldn’t be able to do it – and you can always hit things multiple times just to be sure,” he noted.

Lonsdale backed the idea of a preemptive strike to eliminate nuclear infrastructure but clarified that he respects the administration’s stated goal of stopping nuclear proliferation without necessarily pursuing regime change.

That said, Palantir’s co-founder acknowledged that toppling Iran’s regime could unlock long-term stability in the region.

You take out the mullahs, you remove an entire axis of terror – Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis – all funded and fuelled by this regime. The Abraham Accords could flourish, and peace becomes more viable, he said.

Lonsdale criticizes ‘woke right’ for view on Iran

Joe Lonsdale was unsparing in his criticism of past Democratic administrations as well as factions within the current Republican government.

He rebuked President Obama for avoiding the term “Islamic extremism”, accusing him of playing balance-of-power politics that allowed radicals to thrive.

At the same time, he slammed elements of what he called the “new woke right” – including figures like Steve Bannon and Tucker Carlson – for opposing action against Iran due to war fatigue.

Being against more boots on the ground doesn’t mean you allow maniacs to get nukes – it’s childish stubbornness, being so angry about Iraq that they can’t see this is different.

Palantir’s co-founder also pointed to misinformation campaigns, alleging many anti-interventionist voices online are fake accounts from Islamist networks masquerading as conservatives.

The rising geopolitical tensions, particularly in the Middle East, are helping PLTR shares remain at record levels of about $140.

The post Palantir co-founder: US must prevent Iranian nukes appeared first on Invezz

Tesla has signed its first agreement to build a utility-scale battery storage facility in China, marking a major step in the company’s global energy ambitions despite ongoing trade tensions between Washington and Beijing.

The announcement, shared by Tesla on the Chinese social media platform Weibo, revealed that the new project would become China’s largest grid-side energy storage installation upon completion.

$556 million project backed by local government and Chinese financier

The project, valued at 4 billion yuan (approximately $556 million), involves a partnership between Tesla, the Shanghai municipal government, and China Kangfu International Leasing, according to a report from Chinese media outlet Yicai, cited by Reuters

Tesla stated that its Shanghai battery plant has already produced over 100 Megapacks during the first quarter of 2025.

Each Megapack — a large-scale lithium-ion battery designed for utility use — is capable of storing up to 1 megawatt of power for four hours.In the U.S., a single Megapack is priced just under $1 million, though pricing for the Chinese market has not been disclosed.

Addressing power grid stability and urban energy demand

Tesla emphasized that the new facility will act as a “smart regulator” for urban electricity needs.

Utility-scale battery systems like Megapacks are used to stabilize the grid by storing excess energy from intermittent renewable sources such as wind and solar, then releasing it when demand peaks.

“The grid-side energy storage power station is a ‘smart regulator’ for urban electricity,” Tesla said in its Weibo post.

“It can flexibly adjust grid resources, effectively solve the pressure of urban power supply, and ensure the safe, stable, and efficient electricity demand of the city.”

Competing in a crowded market

Tesla’s expansion into China’s grid storage sector places it in direct competition with major domestic players such as CATL and BYD, both of which have a significant presence in the global battery industry.

CATL, which controls roughly 40% of the global battery market, is also reportedly supplying battery cells and packs for Tesla’s Megapacks, according to Reuters.

While competition is fierce, the Chinese market remains an important growth opportunity for Tesla, especially given Beijing’s push for cleaner energy solutions.

In 2024, China announced plans to add nearly 5 gigawatts of battery-powered capacity by the end of 2025, aiming for a total of 40 gigawatts.

Energy storage: a growing global trend

Tesla’s Shanghai facility also serves global demand, with Megapack units exported to both Europe and Asia.

The deal aligns with a broader surge in utility-scale battery deployment worldwide.

According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), global battery storage capacity grew by 42 gigawatts in 2023, nearly doubling the increase recorded in the previous year.

Despite past political headwinds, Tesla’s latest project underscores the company’s commitment to deepening its foothold in China’s fast-expanding clean energy sector, a move that may also carry diplomatic significance amid complex U.S.-China relations.

The post Tesla to build China’s largest grid-scale battery storage facility appeared first on Invezz

Investors have bailed on First Solar Inc (NASDAQ: FSLR) in recent sessions after the US Senate backed removal of subsidies for solar companies that President Trump proposed last month in his “One Big Beautiful Bill Act”.

Still, RBC analysts led by Christopher Dendrinos remain convinced that FSLR may actually prove a bright spot in an industry that’s otherwise “toast” after the upper chamber’s recent nod on cutting incentives.

Following a massive decline over the past month, First Solar stock is down more than 25% versus its year-to-date high.

Why is First Solar stock insulated from Trump’s spending bill?

Dendrinos is confident that FSLR shares will prove resilient and more insulated than other renewable energy stocks from the potential impact of the Senate’s recent decision on the solar industry, primarily because it’s a utility-scale operator.

“We believe utility solar will be more resilient [since] these projects are not limited by the leasing restrictions,” he told clients in a research note on Friday.

First Solar drives most of its business from large-cap companies like Amazon and Meta Platforms, instead of households.

In 2025, these names rely rather aggressively on solar farms to power their artificial intelligence data centres. So, the demand outlook for FSLR remains strong as ever since subsidies and discounts don’t matter much for its multi-billion-dollar customers.

“If you [build] a data center, energy power is like 7% of the cost. If 7% of the cost [becomes] 9% of the cost, do you think they will stop this project? I do not think so,” argued Per Lekander, the founder of Clean Energy Transition, in a recent interview with CNBC.  

That’s actually part of the reason why First Solar shares, despite the recent crash, are still up more than 20% versus their year-to-date low in early April.

Is it worth buying FSLR shares at current levels?

Lekander sees the recent pullback in FSLR stock as a raging “buying opportunity” as there aren’t any practical alternatives for the Tempe headquartered manufacturer of solar panels.

“If you were to go and try to do a gas turbine, you’d probably get it delivered in 2033. If you want to build a nuclear plant, it’s 2040. A solar plant, you can do it one year,” he told CNBC this week.

Lekander sees the company’s utility-scale operations as such a massive advantage that he’s convinced First Solar stock could as much as double from current levels.  

What’s also worth mentioning here is that solar power, even without tax credits, arguably retains its value proposition compared to fossil fuels.

That’s partly why the rest of Wall Street hasn’t thrown in the towel on First Solar stock either. The consensus rating on FSLR shares remains at “overweight” with the mean target of $202, indicating potential upside of nearly 40% from current levels.

The post Why First Solar stock remains a raging buy despite Trump’s spending bill appeared first on Invezz