The enigma of Bitcoin’s creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, has baffled the world for years.
With billions of dollars and the future of digital finance potentially tied to this anonymous figure, any attempt to unmask Nakamoto is met with intrigue and skepticism.
HBO’s latest documentary, ‘Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery’, aims to do just that—though not without backlash.
In the film, director Cullen Hoback presents Peter Todd, a Bitcoin core developer, as the person behind the creation of Bitcoin in 2009.
But Todd has firmly rejected this claim.
“For the record, I’m not Satoshi,” Todd declared in a statement to CNN.
He further criticized the film for being “irresponsible” and endangering his life by placing him at the center of such speculation.
“Cullen is grasping for straws here,” Todd stated, revealing that he was neither contacted nor given a chance to review the documentary prior to its release.
He’s amplifying coincidences into a larger conspiracy.
HBO, part of Warner Bros. Discovery like CNN, has yet to respond to these allegations.
Nevertheless, Hoback defended his work, telling CNN he was not surprised by Todd’s denial, and that he stood by the documentary’s conclusions.
“Peter was there when we interviewed him,” Hoback explained.
He had every chance to clarify things. I remain confident in the evidence we present.
The mystery of Satoshi Nakamoto deepens
The speculation surrounding the true identity of Satoshi Nakamoto has sparked countless theories over the years.
Who is the person, or group, that developed Bitcoin and vanished from the digital landscape in 2013? As Bitcoin’s value surged, so did interest in the figure who allegedly controls an estimated one million Bitcoin—worth billions of dollars.
Hoback spent years following various leads, eventually zeroing in on Todd.
He cites a 2010 Bitcoin forum post from Todd as potential evidence linking him to Nakamoto.
This isn’t the first time Hoback has sought to solve an online mystery.
He previously gained attention for his work on HBO’s ‘Q: Into The Storm’, where he examined the origins of the QAnon conspiracy.
In this case, however, Hoback believes the evidence points toward Todd, and the film’s climactic moments involve Todd’s reaction when confronted with these claims.
The importance of Nakamoto’s identity
Why does uncovering Nakamoto’s identity even matter? Hoback offers a compelling argument.
“If Bitcoin had faded into obscurity, it wouldn’t be such a big deal. But Bitcoin is becoming a critical part of the global financial system. It’s being embraced by countries, integrated into retirement plans, and it’s not going anywhere,” he told CNN.
There’s this anonymous figure who could hold a massive share of it. That’s a lot of power for someone we know nothing about.
Hoback argues that Nakamoto’s anonymity once served Bitcoin’s mythos, allowing people to view the cryptocurrency as a near-divine gift to humanity. But now, that very anonymity may be a liability, especially given Bitcoin’s growing influence.
Why did Todd agree to the interview?
One of the film’s key moments is Hoback’s interview with Todd, who agreed to be part of the documentary despite the implications.
Why would someone who is allegedly Nakamoto voluntarily step into the spotlight?
Hoback speculates that individuals who have had such a profound impact on the world might harbor conflicting emotions.
Imagine you’ve held this secret for years. Wouldn’t there be a part of you that wants credit? And maybe you think appearing on camera would actually help your cover.
Todd, Hoback explains, has a known interest in game theory and alternate identities, adding a layer of complexity to his involvement in the documentary.
The Climactic Confrontation
The film’s tension culminates in Hoback’s direct confrontation with Todd.
Their paths first crossed years earlier at a Bitcoin conference, but it wasn’t until much later that Hoback began to seriously consider Todd as Nakamoto.
Todd’s cryptic behavior and his connections within the Bitcoin community led Hoback to explore the theory further.
While Todd himself has implicated others, including Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back, Hoback finds the entire interaction revealing.
“In some ways, the reaction says more than the evidence itself,” he said of the film’s finale.
Legal concerns addressed
Despite Todd’s denials, HBO had no qualms about airing the documentary. Hoback assured CNN that the film went through rigorous fact-checking, and Todd was given ample opportunity to present his side.Everything in the film is factual. You see the reactions unfold in real-time,” Hoback emphasized.
There were no concerns because the case we present is based on evidence.
Though Todd has rejected the documentary’s claims, Hoback is unphased.
“He’s had plenty of time to prepare for this. His reaction doesn’t surprise me,” the director concluded.
Ultimately, whether Peter Todd is Nakamoto or not, Money Electric reignites the debate around Bitcoin’s elusive creator, ensuring that the mystery—and the speculation—will continue.
The post The real identify of Satoshi Nakamoto: HBO doc claims to reveal Bitcoin’s creator, subject denies it appeared first on Invezz